Role of Indian ICT Organisations in Realising Sustainable Development Goals Through Corporate Social Engagement

  • Parvathi Jayaprakash
  • R. Radhakrishna Pillai
Part of the Advances in Theory and Practice of Emerging Markets book series (ATPEM)


UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) is an initiative of the United Nations to provide a technical and operational fit process for the achievement of sustainable development across the globe. Government and NGOs primarily cater to either of the aspects of sustainable development, but they lack infrastructure and capability. The public policies, though central for achieving these goals, are not adequate. The private sector should also be equally involved as they can drive innovation and growth in the nation. With the presence of the organisational and management expertise, the private sector can accelerate the attainment of these goals. This paper studies the role of businesses in attainment of SDG through corporate social responsibility (CSR) with ICT moderating this relationship. Since Information Communication Technologies (ICT) is considered to act as a catalyst for achieving these SDG, a mixed methodology is used in the study. The study identifies the firm size, profitability and industry sensitivity as factors influencing the CSR implementation in Indian ICT organisations and profitability, ICT and industry sensitivity to be influencing SDG. CSR need not be the only means for businesses to contribute to SDG. SDG can be considered as “corporate social opportunity” to obtain a competitive edge over other firms in the industry.


Sustainable development goals (SDG) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) ICT4SDG Mixed methodology 


  1. Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg Manag J 26(3):197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayoud NS, Kavanagh M, Slaughter G (2012) Factors influencing levels of corporate social responsibility disclosure by Libyan firms: a mixed study. Int J Econ Finance 4(4):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolanle AB, Adebiyi SO, Muyideen AA (2012) Corporate social responsibility and profitability of Nigeria banks-a causal relationship. Res J Finance Account 3(1):6–17Google Scholar
  4. Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman (No. 3). Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2008) Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. J Bus Ethics 83(4):685–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brusseau J (2011) The Business Ethics Workshop, v. 1.0. Flat World Knowledge, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Capriotti P, Moreno A (2007) Corporate citizenship and public relations: the importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites. Public Relat Rev 33(1):84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty S (2016) India’s services sector grew 10% a year in 2015-16: CII report. Contemp Bus 7(1):135–149Google Scholar
  9. Cowen SS, Ferreri LB, Parker LD (1987) The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Acc Organ Soc 12(2):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creswell JW, Clark VLP (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev 36(2):90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasnaoui A, Freeman I (2010) Diffusion and implementation of corporate social responsibility (csr): the role of information and communication technologies (ict). Manage Avenir 39(9):386–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jankalova M (2016) Approaches to the evaluation of corporate social responsibility. Procedia Econ Finance 39:580–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones TM (1980) Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. Calif Manage Rev 22(3):59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kramer MR, Porter M (2011) Creating shared value. Harv Bus Rev 89(1/2):62–77Google Scholar
  17. Masud M, Hossain M (2012) Corporate social responsibility reporting practices in Bangladesh: a study of selected private commercial banks. IOSR J Bus Manag 6(2):42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitsui (2013) Creating shared value through strategic CSR. Sumitomo Mitsui trust holding CSR report. Retrieved from Accessed on 11 Oct 2017
  19. Nelson J, Prescott D (2003) Business and the millennium development goals: a framework for action. International Business Leaders Forum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harv Bus Rev 89(1-2)Google Scholar
  21. Preston LE (1978) Analyzing corporate social performance-methods and results. J Contemp Bus 7(1):135–150Google Scholar
  22. Purushothaman M, Tower G, Hancock R, Taplin R (2000) Determinants of corporate social reporting practices of listed Singapore companies. Pac Account Rev 12(2):101–133Google Scholar
  23. Rahman A, Widyasari KN (2008) The analysis of company characteristic influence toward CSR disclosure: empirical evidence of manufacturing companies listed in JSX. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia 12(1):25–35Google Scholar
  24. Rangan K, Chase L, Karim S (2015) The truth about CSR. Harv Bus Rev 93(1/2):40–49Google Scholar
  25. Schäfer H (2005) International corporate social responsibility rating systems: conceptual outline and empirical results. J Corp Citizenship 20:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmidt-Traub G, Shah A (2015) Investment needs to achieve the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, Paris/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharma S (2011) Corporate social responsibility in India. Ind J Ind Relat 46:637–649Google Scholar
  28. Spicer BH (1978) Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: an empirical study. Account Rev 53:94–111Google Scholar
  29. Stange KC, Crabtree BF, Miller WL (2006) Publishing multi-method research. Ann Fam Med 4(4):292–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sutton, P. (2004). A perspective on environmental sustainability. Paper on the Victorian Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  31. Wartick SL, Rude RE (1986) Issues management: corporate fad or corporate function? Calif Manag Rev 29(1):124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watts P, Holme L (1998) Meeting changing expectations. WBCSD, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  33. World Bank (2013) Social inclusion, Retrieved from Accessed on 13 Dec 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Management KozhikodeKunnamangalam, KozhikodeIndia

Personalised recommendations