Digital India pp 159-180 | Cite as

Transparency: Panacea for Corruption-Free Governance and Reforms?

  • Anil Srivastava
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Theory and Practice of Emerging Markets book series (ATPEM)

Abstract

In the aftermath of recent corporate and government scandals, stakeholders have become wary, demanding more transparency and accountability in organizational processes. Transparency is a complex concept, with various perspectives existing in academic literature and many organizations struggling to identify an adequate level of transparency which balances the expectations of its various stakeholders. These expectations may be shaped by the cultural environment, and consequently, the desired level of transparency from an organization may be a function of country culture. While there is much academic literature pertinent to transparency in developed countries, very few researchers have explored this domain in the Indian context. Hence, considering the importance of and need for organizational transparency in India, our study raises three key research questions, to empirically examine the concept of transparency and expand the understanding of factors affecting transparency in public and private organizations.

Keywords

Transparency Interest groups Corruption Governance Public organizations Private organizations Culture 

References

  1. Ball C (2009) What is transparency? Public Integr 11(4):293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr A, Serra D (2010) Corruption and culture: an experimental analysis. J Public Econ 94(11):862–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauhr M, Grimes M (2012) What is government transparency? New measures and relevance for quality of government. QoG Working Paper Series, 16Google Scholar
  4. Bauhr M, Nasiritousi N (2012) Resisting transparency: corruption, legitimacy, and the quality of global environmental policies. Glob Environ Pol 12(4):9–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumann H (2017) A failure of governmentality: why transparency international underestimated corruption in Ben Ali’s Tunisia. Third World Q 38(2):467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benito B, Bastida F (2009) Budget transparency, fiscal performance, and political turnout: an international approach. Public Adm Rev 69(3):403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Grimes JM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Gov Inf Q 27(3):264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bushman RM, Piotroski JD, Smith AJ (2004) What determines corporate transparency? J Account Res 42(2):207–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demchak CC, Friis C, Porte TML (2000) Webbing governance: national differences in constructing the face of public organizations. In: David Garson G (ed) Handbook of public information systems. Marcel Dekker Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Durnev A, Errunza V, Molchanov A (2009) Property rights protection, corporate transparency, and growth. J Int Bus Stud 40(9):1533–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finel BI, Lord KM (1999) The surprising logic of transparency. Int Stud Q 43(2):315–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Florini AM (2002) Increasing transparency in government. Int J World Peace 19(3):3–37Google Scholar
  13. Florini A (2007) The right to know: transparency for an open world. Columbia University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forssbæck J, Oxelheim L (2014) The Multi-faceted concept of transparency, IFN Working Paper, No. 1013Google Scholar
  15. Francis JR, Huang S, Khurana IK, Pereira R (2009) Does corporate transparency contribute to efficient resource allocation? J Account Res 47(4):943–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gelos RG, Wei SJ (2002) Transparency and international investor behavior (No. w9260). National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghauri PN, Hadjikhani A, Pahlberg C (2015) Multinational corporations’ relationship with political actors:transparency versus opacity. In: The Oxford handbook of economic and institutional transparency. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 341–358Google Scholar
  18. Grimmelikhuijsen S, Porumbescu G, Hong B, Im T (2013) The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment. Public Adm Rev 73(4):575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hebb T (2006) The economic inefficiency of secrecy: pension fund investors’ corporate transparency concerns. J Bus Ethics 63(4):385–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (2007) Transparency and corporate governance (No. w12875). National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  22. Hofstede GJ (2003) Transparency in netchains. In: Information technology for a better agri-food sector, environment and rural living. Debrecen University, Debrecen, pp 17–29Google Scholar
  23. International Monetary Fund (1986) A manual on government finance statistics. International Monetary Fund, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaewon K (2017) Samsung arrest imperils company and country. Financial Times. [online] Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/da80812a-f52f-11e6-8758-6876151821a6. Accessed 16 Aug 2017
  25. Jenkins R (1999) Democratic politics and economic reform in India, vol 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaufmann D (2002) Transparency, incentives and prevention (TIP) for corruption control and good governance. Empirical findings, practical lessons, and strategies for action based on international experience. The World Bank. Washington. http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pdf/quinghua_presentation.pdf
  27. Kopits G, Craig J (1998) Transparency in government operations. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lanyi A, Azfar O (2005) Tools for assessing corruption & integrity in institutions: a handbook. USAID, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. La Porte TM, Demchak CC, De Jong M (2002) Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web: empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Adm Soc 34(4):411–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laudon KC (1977) Communications technology and democratic participation. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee S (2017) Samsung electronics tightens donation rules; report says two group executives offer to quit. [online] Available at: http://in.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-politics-samsung-elec-idINKBN16307Y. Accessed 16 Aug 2017
  32. Lopes IT, Serrasqueiro RM (2017) The influence of culture and transparency on global research and development intensity: an overview across Europe. Contaduría y Administración. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2017.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malhotra NK (2008) Marketing research: an applied orientation, 5/e. Pearson Education, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchell RB (1998) Sources of transparency: information systems in international regimes. Int Stud Q 42(1):109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morgan N (2014, July 23) Is Corporate transparency always a good thing? Retrieved August 17, 2017, from https://hbr.org/2008/10/is-corporate-transparency-alwa
  36. Nichols P, Confalone L (2016) What the Panama papers mean for transparency and ‘Dark Money’. Retrieved August 05, 2017, from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/confalon-nichols-panama-papers/
  37. Oxelheim L (2010) Globalization, transparency and economic growth: the vulnerability of Chinese firms to macroeconomic shocks. J Asian Econ 21(1):66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Park H, Blenkinsopp J (2011) The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. Int Rev Adm Sci 77(2):254–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts A (2004) A partial revolution: the diplomatic ethos and transparency in intergovernmental organizations. Public Adm Rev 64(4):410–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taras V, Rowney J, Steel P (2009) Half a century of measuring culture: review of approaches, challenges, and limitations based on the analysis of 121 instruments for quantifying culture. J Int Manag 15(4):357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tennant F (2015) Overcoming opacity: the importance of corporate transparency. Financier Worldwide Magazine. Retrieved August 17, 2017, from https://www.financierworldwide.com/overcoming-opacity-the-importance-of-corporate-transparency/#.WZVz0FEjHIU
  42. Transparency International Australia (2000) International trends and developments in transparency and investment. Retrieved June 27, 2017, from http://transparency.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/International-Trends-and-Developments-in-Transparency-and-Investment.pdf
  43. Vishwanath T, Kaufmann D (1999) Towards transparency in finance and governance, World Bank Research Working PaperGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anil Srivastava
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management StudiesIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations