Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Sergio Starkstein
Chapter

Abstract

The dominant contemporary concept of fear navigates between the Scylla of biological psychiatry and the Charybdis of social construction. It is paradoxical that after all the attention in the neural and social sciences to fear in the last century, we are often seen to be living in an age of risk, fear, stress, and anxiety. The oversight provided by the different understandings of fear and its therapies in this book reflects the preference for a broad perspective on different aspects of fear, and for empowering individuals in active participation in their own therapeutic process. This is not to advocate for an anachronistic return to ancient remedies; rather, by setting out the different understandings it is possible to see how their concepts may be philosophically re-elaborated for delivering better therapies and further conceptual and empirical investigation.

References

  1. Beck, U. (2009). World at risk (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dunant, S., & Porter, R. (1996). The age of anxiety. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hutto, D. D. (2009). Lessons from Wittgenstein: Elucidating folk psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jackson, M. (2013). The age of stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016). Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and value (P. Finch, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press .Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western AustraliaFremantleAustralia

Personalised recommendations