Skip to main content

Eastern Praxis and Western Critique: France Bučar’s Critical Systems Theory in Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
At His Crossroad
  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

Yugoslavia was the site of unorthodox thinking on multiple fronts during the postwar period. In addition to the geopolitical innovation of the “non-aligned movement” and its domestic attempt at “self-management socialism,” the intellectual environment in the country after Tito’s 1948 break with Stalin also allowed for the development of theoretical work that departed from the Marxism-Leninism of the rest of the communist bloc. One of the most important attempts to blend Marxism with decidedly non-Leninist elements comes from the Slovenian politician and intellectual, France Bučar. In the postwar period, Bučar sought to link his political activity to his intellectual work by developing his own critical systems theory. Unlike the thinkers within the Soviet Union, he was able to explore theoretical resources beyond Karl Marx, focusing in particular the groundbreaking work of Max Weber. This resulted in an agent-centric approach to systems theory that highlights the importance of the individual and geopolitical ethics. This paper aims to situate Bučar’s work in the context of postwar Yugoslavia. In so doing, I bring Bučar into conversation with the most important movement that sought to bring Marx together with Weber from the Western side of the Iron Curtain, i.e. the Frankfurt School of critical theory. I argue that certain aspects of Bučar’s critical systems theory bear a striking resemblance to Habermas’s own attempts to integrate Weberian insights into his own version of critical theory. I conclude by reflecting on how Bučar’s work can be understood as a combination of Eastern praxis with Western critique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although I will focus on these two variants, many other interpretations of critical systems theory exist. For an overview, see Bausch (2001).

  2. 2.

    The journal actually had both a domestic and an international edition. The foreign contributors include Jürgen Habermas, Lucien Goldman, Herbert Marcuse, André Gorz, Norman Birnbaum and Donald Hodges, among others.

  3. 3.

    These meetings continue to this day. However, as a result of the Yugoslavian civil war, since 1992 they have been held in Prague under the auspices of the Institute of Philosophy at the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic in cooperation with Charles University. I am proud to be a regular participant at these meetings, which continue the tradition of the Praxis summer school, even though my name has been misspelled (Verošek instead of Verovšek) in the official list of participants published for the 25th anniversary of the relocation of the conference to Prague. See The Prague Conference: Directors, General Themes, Plenaries, Workshops (2017).

  4. 4.

    Bučar’s name is not included in a partial list of participants, but he may still have been present.

  5. 5.

    This shared desire is also the root for another similarities between Bučar and the Frankfurt School: their mutual interest in American pragmatism. See Rehg and Bohman (2001).

  6. 6.

    For more on how this process plays out in the example of markets, see Jütten (2013). In certain respects, Habermas’s argument is similar to Sandel (2013).

Literature

  • Bausch, K. C. (1997). The Habermas/Luhmann debate and subsequent Habermasian perspectives on systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(5), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, K. C. (2001). The emerging consensus in social systems theory. Boston: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1962). The end of ideology: On the exhaustion of political ideas in the fifties: With “the resumption of history in the new century”. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (2017). The prehistory of the Prague meetings. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 43(3), 272–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bučar, F. (1978). Participation of state and political organizations in Enterprise decisions. In J. Obradović & W. N. Dunn (Eds.), Worker's self-management and organizational power in Yugoslavia (pp. 416–432). Pittsburgh: University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bučar, F. (1993). Slovenia in Europe. Nationalities Papers, 21(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bučar, F. (2003). Porusena harmonija sveta. Miš: Dob pri Domžalah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bučar, F. (2007). Rojstvo države. Radovljica: Didakta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Cohen, R. S. (1974). The repression at Belgrade University. The New York Review of Books, 21(1), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Hazelrigg, L. E., & Pope, W. (1975). De-Parsonizing weber: A critique of Parsons' interpretation of Weber's sociology. American Sociological Review, 40(2), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coundenhove-Kalergi, R. N. (2000). Panevropa. Ljubljana: Slovensko panevropsko gibanje.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, B. (2004). From Frankfurt to Ljubljana: Critical theory from Adorno to Žižek. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 9(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. (1991). Yugoslavia: The case of self-managing market socialism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(4), 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, D. (1992). Self-management and the future of socialism: Lessons from Yugoslavia. Science and Society, 56(1), 92–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1990). In J. Strachey (Ed.), Five lectures on psycho-analysis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenwald, O. (1983). The Yugoslav search for man: Marxist humanism in contemporary Yugoslavia. South Hadley: J. F. Bergin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984/1987). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001). The Postnational constellation and the future of democracy. In J. Habermas (Ed.), The Postnational constellation: Political essays (pp. 58–112). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2015). The lure of technocracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & Luhmann, N. (1971). Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie-was leistet die Systemforschung? Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & Henrich, D. (1974). Zwei Reden. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & Derrida, J. (2005). February 15, or what binds Europeans together: A plea for a common foreign policy, beginning in the core of Europe. In D. Levy, M. Pensky, J. C. Torpey, & J. Torpey (Eds.), Old Europe, new Europe, core Europe: Transatlantic relations after the Iraq war (pp. 3–13). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. W. (2001). Market socialism and political pluralism: Theoretical reflections on Yugoslavia. Studies in East European Thought, 53(4), 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jütten, T. (2013). Habermas and markets. Constellations, 20(4), 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knodt, E. (1994). Toward a non-foundationalist epistemology: The Habermas/Luhmann controversy revisited. New German Critique, 21(1), 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovač, I. (2013). Filozofija Franceta Bučarja znotraj tokov mednarodnih odnosov: "geopolitična etika" in post-pozitivna znanstvena paradigma. Anthropos, 45(3–4), 31–−55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovač, I. (2014). EU in the struggle for global governance: Geopolitical ethics. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy, 2(1–2), 118–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1982). The differentiation of society. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. (1985). Complexity and democracy, or the seducements of systems theory. New German Critique, 12(2), 27–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marković, M. (1976). Marxist philosophy in Yugoslavia: The praxis group. In R. T. De George & J. P. Scanlan (Eds.), Marxism and religion in Eastern Europe (pp. 63–−89). Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marković, M. (1987). Povodom rasmisljanja o filozofije prakse. Theoria, 30(3–4), 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, G. (1991). A final look at the critical perspective of the Yugoslav praxis group. Humanity and Society, 15(2), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2000). Another country: German intellectuals, unification, and national identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2007). Constitutional patriotism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrović, G. (1967). La philosophie yougoslave aujourd'hui. Praxis (International Edition), 3(2), 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehg, W., & Bohman, J. (2001). Pluralism and the pragmatic turn: The transformation of critical theory, essays in honor of Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2013). What money can't buy: The moral limits of markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, G. S. (1977). Praxis, Marxist criticism and dissent in socialist Yugoslavia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm, M. (2005). Konstellationsforshung-Ein Methodenprofil: Motive und Perspektiven. In M. Mulsow & M. Stamm (Eds.), Konstellationsforschung (pp. 31–73). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirk, P. (2000). Critical theory, politics and society: An introduction. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šupek, R. (1972). Čemu, uostalom, sada još i ovaj marksizam. Praxis (Domestic Edition), 8(3–4), 328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Prague Conference: Directors, General Themes, Plenaries, Workshops, Papers (1993–2016). (2017). Philosophy & Social Criticism, 43(3), 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, P. (1978). The non-aligned movement: The origins of a third world alliance. New York: Nichols Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958). Politics as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & W. Mills (Eds.), From max weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 129–158). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of the real!: Five essays on September 11 and related dates. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Verovšek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verovšek, P.J. (2019). Eastern Praxis and Western Critique: France Bučar’s Critical Systems Theory in Context. In: Kovač, I. (eds) At His Crossroad. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78331-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics