Sanitation and Hygiene

Chapter

Abstract

Using data from the Indian Human Development Survey, this chapter examines both toilet possession and personal hygiene in India. It shows that the strongest influences on households in India having a toilet were their standard of living, the highest educational level of adults in the households, and whether or not they possess ancillary amenities like a separate kitchen for cooking, a pucca roof and floor, and water supply within the dwelling or its compound. However, in so doing, it also shows that whether households had toilets depended not just on household-specific factors but also on the social environment within which the households were located. More specifically, ceteris paribus households in more developed villages would be more likely to have a toilet than those in less developed villages. The chapter rejects the nihilism of the idea, put forward in several academic papers, that the problem of open defecation in India is an intractable one because caste, ritual pollution and untouchability instil in rural Indians a preference for open spaces.

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P., & Lee, K. H. (1999). Consumer Resistance to, and Acceptance of, Innovations. Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 218–225.Google Scholar
  2. Bhalotra, S., Valente, C., & van Soest, A. (2010). The Puzzle of Muslim Survival in India. Journal of Health Economics, 29, 191–204.Google Scholar
  3. Borooah, V. K. (2004). On the Incidence of Diarrhoea Among Young Indian Children. Economics and Human Biology, 2, 119–138.Google Scholar
  4. Borooah, V. K., & Iyer, S. (2005). Religion, Literacy, and the Female-to-Male Ratio. Economic and Political Weekly, 40, 419–427.Google Scholar
  5. Cairncross, S. (2003). Sanitation in the Developing World: Current Status and Future Solutions. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 13, S123–S131.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, R., & von Medeazza, G. (2013). Sanitation and Stunting in India: Undernutrition’s Blind Spot. Economic and Political Weekly, 48, 15–18.Google Scholar
  7. Coffey, D., & Spears, D. (2017). Where India Goes: Abandoned Toilets, Stunted Development and the Costs of Caste. Noida: HarperCollins Publishers India.Google Scholar
  8. Coffey, D., Gupta, A., Hathi, P., Khurana, N., Spears, D., Srivastav, N., et al. (2014). Revealed Preference for Open Defecation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 49, 43–55.Google Scholar
  9. Coffey, D., Gupta, A., Hathi, P., Spears, D., Srivastav, N., & Vyas, S. (2017). Understanding Open Defecation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 52, 59–66.Google Scholar
  10. Desai, S., Dubey, A., & Vanneman, R. (2015). India Human Development Survey-II. University of Maryland and National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  11. Duesenberry, J. (1967). Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ejemot-Nwadiaro, R. I., Ehri, J. E., Meremikwu, M. M., Critchley, J. A. (2015). Hand Washing Promotion for Preventing Diarrhoea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Ghosh, A., Gupta, A., & Spears, D. (2014). Are Children in West Bengal Shorter Than in Bangladesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 49, 21–24.Google Scholar
  14. Huang, D. B., & Zhou, J. (2007). Effect of Effective Handwashing in the Prevention of Diarrhoeal Illness Among Patients with AIDS. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 56, 659–663.Google Scholar
  15. Jenkins, M. W., & Curtis, V. (2005). Achieving the Good Life: Why Some People Want Latrines in Rural Benin. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 2446–2459.Google Scholar
  16. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mason, R. (2000). The Social Significance of Consumption: James Duesenberry’s Contribution to Consumer Theory. Journal of Economic Issues, 34, 553–572.Google Scholar
  18. McCormick, K. (1983). Duesenberry and Veblen: The Demonstration Effect Revisited. Journal of Economic Issues, 17, 1125–1129.Google Scholar
  19. Planning Commission. (2013). Evaluation Study on the Total Sanitation Campaign. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  20. Rosenboom, J. W., Jacks, C., Phyrum, K., Roberts, M., & Baker, T. (2011). Sanitation Marketing in Cambodia. Waterlines, 30, 21–40.Google Scholar
  21. Samuelson, P. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6, 317–344.Google Scholar
  23. Spears, D. (2013). How Much International Variation in Child Height Can Sanitation Explain (World Bank Policy Research Paper 6351). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  24. Spears, D., & Thorat, A. (2015). Caste, Purity and Pollution and the Puzzle of Open Defecation in India. Working Paper, Research Institute for Compassionate Economics. www.riceinstitute.org.
  25. Zainulbhai, A. (2017, September 28). A People’s Movement. Indian Express. http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/swachh-bharat-campaign-open-defacation-pm-narendra-modi-4864496/. Accessed 28 September 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied EconomicsUniversity of UlsterBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations