Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Achieving Equity and Quality in Higher Education pp 327–348Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Governmental Supports for Students in Turkey: Beneficiary Perspective on the Use of Financial and Social Support in Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Providing financial and social supports to students is a common policy practice in many countries. Scholarships and basic services (food, accommodation, transportation, free health services etc.) are the most common supports provided to students. Particularly developing countries which follow quantitative growth policies in higher education need more comprehensive student support systems. In developing countries both access to higher education and maintenance of the higher education degrees is a challenging task for students coming from disadvantaged segments of the society. Based on these arguments, this study aimed at revealing the perception of higher education level students about the effectiveness of the supports provided by different public institutions (central governments, municipalities, and their own universities) in their access to higher education, in facilitating their study experience, and in contributing to their employability after their study. This study was designed as a survey study. Financial and social support policies are particularly important for students who attend faculties of education. Large scale studies conducted with pre-service teacher candidates suggest that the students attending these faculties are coming from socio-economically disadvantaged segments of society. Given these contextual characteristics, this study was conducted among faculty of education students. Data from 773 students studying at ten different public universities in Turkey were collected. The results indicated that the students find the role of the public supports as extremely weak in their choices of the field (education) for higher education study and in facilitating their lives during their studies. Besides, the participants indicated a negative perception about the role of public support in their future employability after study. These results show that the utility of the public support system is extremely narrow in impacting the students’ lives in Turkey.

This study was supported by Middle East Technical University’s Scientific Research Funds (Project Code: BAP-05-02-2016-005)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agasisti, T., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Grants in Italian university: A look at the heterogeneity of their impact on students’ performances. Studies in Higher Education, 5079(December), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksu, M., Demir, C. E., Daloglu, A., Yildirim, S., & Kiraz, E. (2010). Who are the future teachers in Turkey? Characteristics of entering student teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene, F., & Owusu-Ansah, A. (2013). A descriptive assessment of higher education access, participation, equity, and disparity in Ghana. SAGE Open, 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013497725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevc, M., & Uršič, S. (2008). Relations between funding, equity, and efficiency of higher education. Education Economics, 16(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290802338037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callender, C. (2010). Bursaries and institutional aid in higher education in England: Do they safeguard and promote fair access? Oxford Review of Education, 36(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980903518910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callender, C., & Wilkinson, D. (2013). Student perceptions of the impact of bursaries and institutional aid on their higher education choices and the implications for the national scholarship programme in England. Journal of Social Policy, 42(2), 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chankseliani, M. (2013). Rural disadvantage in Georgian higher education admissions: A mixed-methods study. Comparative Education Review, 57(3), 424–456. https://doi.org/10.1086/670739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin-Shan, L., & Hui-Juan, C. (2012). Education equity in the process of the massification of Taiwan’s higher education. Chinese Education & Society, 45(5), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932450508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, D. (2015). Has massification of higher education led to more equity? Clues to a reflection on Portuguese education arena. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.788221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergen, H. (2013). Uncertainties and risks determining individual demand for higher education: A sample from Mersin University. Egitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 433–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, K. S., & Holley, A. K. (2011). Those invisible barriers are real: The progression of first-generation students through doctoral education. Equity and Excellence in Education, 44(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grebennikov, L., & Skaines, I. (2008). University of Western Sydney students at risk: Profile and opportunities for change. Journal of Institutional Research, 14(10), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunay, D., & Gunay, A. (2011). 1933’den günümüze Türk Yükseköğretiminde niceliksel gelişmeler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2011.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, N. (2011). The ethical dimensions of awarding financial aid. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.552629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, A., & Van Den Berg, M. (2003). Ethnic-specific achievement in Dutch higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 28(3), 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurriyet. (2016). Atanmayı bekleyen öğretmen sayısı 350 bine ulaştı [Teachers awaiting appointment reaches 350 thousands]. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/atanmayi-bekleyen-ogretmen-sayisi-350-bine-ulasti-40098572. Accessed on 22 Aug 2017.

  • Keohane, O. N. (2006). Higher ground: Ethics and leadership in a modern university. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kondakci, Y., & Orucu, D. (2016). Tertiary schooling patterns and disadvantaged groups in Turkey. In G. Whiteford & M. Shah (Eds.), Bridges, pathways and transitions: International innovations in widening participation (pp. 209–227). Sidney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, L., & Neubauer, D. (2016). The role of the government in providing access to higher education: The case of government-sponsored financial aid in the US. Journal of Education and Work, 29(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1049027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCowan, T. (2016). Three dimensions of equity of access to higher education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(4), 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2015.1043237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo, T., Sanchez, F., & Velasco, T. (2016). Credit for low-income students and access to and academic performance in higher education in Colombia: A regression discontinuity approach. World Development, 80, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Population with tertiary education (indicator). doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/0b8f90e9-en. Accessed on 18 Jan 2017.

  • Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In İ. J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXI, pp. 99–157). Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. A. (2004). Understanding differences in the choice of college attended. The Review of Higher Education, 27(4), 501–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E. T. J. (2012). The attainment of White and ethnic minority students in distance education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schendel, R., & McCowan, T. (2016). Expanding higher education systems in low- and middle-income countries: The challenges of equity and quality. Higher Education, 72(4), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0028-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheurich, J., & Skrla, L. (2003). Leadership for equity and excellence: Creating high-achievement classroom, schools, and districts. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M., & Widin, J. (2010). Indigenous students’ voices: Monitoring indigenous student satisfaction and retention in a large Australian University. Journal of Institutional Research, 15(1), 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M., Lewis, I., & Fitzgerald, R. (2011). The renewal of quality assurance in Australian higher education: The challenge of balancing academic rigor, equity and quality outcomes. Quality in Higher Education, 17(3), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamatov, D. (2012). The impact of standardized testing on university entrance issues in Kyrgyzstan. European Education, 44(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934440104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiner, M., & Modood, T. (2002). Help or hindrance? Higher education and the route to ethnic equality. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(2), 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swail, W. S., Redd, K. E., & Perna, L. W. (2003). Retaining minority students in higher education. ERIC Higher Education Report, 30(2), 1–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, E., & Roberts, A. C. (2006). Enhancing the early student experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(4), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, G., Shah, M., & Nair, C. S. (2013). Equity and excellence are not mutually exclusive: A discussion of academic standards in an era of widening participation. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(3), 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuzer, H., Meşeci, F., Demir, İ., & Sertelin, Ç. (2005). Günümüz üniversite gençliğinin sorunları [Current problems of university students]. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Yasar Kondakci, Yusuf İkbal Oldac & Hanife Hilal Senay

  2. Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

    Kadir Beycioglu

Authors
  1. Yasar Kondakci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kadir Beycioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yusuf İkbal Oldac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hanife Hilal Senay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasar Kondakci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia

    Mahsood Shah

  2. Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia

    Jade McKay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kondakci, Y., Beycioglu, K., Oldac, Y.İ., Senay, H.H. (2018). Governmental Supports for Students in Turkey: Beneficiary Perspective on the Use of Financial and Social Support in Higher Education. In: Shah, M., McKay, J. (eds) Achieving Equity and Quality in Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Excellence and Equity in Global Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78316-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78316-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78315-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78316-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation