Abstract
As with many countries, the UK is attempting to allow wider participation in higher education for all social groups. UK universities are increasingly making decisions about undergraduate admissions with reference to contextual indicators which are intended to identify whether or not an applicant comes from a disadvantaged family, neighbourhood or school environment. However, the indicators used are often chosen because they are readily available, without much consideration of the possible alternatives. This chapter suggests which of the potential contextual indicators are worth pursuing and which are not of high enough quality or might lead to greater injustice. It is based on a large systematic review of prior international evidence, and individual-level student statistics for all students in England from 2006 onwards.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boliver, V., Gorard, S., & Siddiqui, N. (2016). Will the use of contextual indicators make UK HE admissions fairer? Education Sciences, 5(4), http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/5/4/306
Boliver, V., Gorard, S., Powell, M., & Moreira, T. (2017) Mapping and evaluating the use of contextual data in undergraduate admissions in Scotland (Report to the Scottish Funding Council).
Broecke, S. (2015). University rankings: Do they matter in the UK? Education Economics, 23(2), 137–161.
Broecke, S., & Nicholls, T. (2007) Ethnicity and Degree Attainment (Research Report no. 92). Department for Education and Skills, London. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/RW92.pdf
Chowdry, H., Crawford, C., Dearden, L., Goodman, A., & Vignoles, A. (2008). Understanding the determinants of participation in higher education and the quality of institute attended: analysis using administrative data (IFS Report). http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/4279
Chowdry, H., Crawford, C., Dearden, L., Goodman, A., & Vignoles, A. (2013). Widening participation in higher education: analysis using linked data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 176(Part 2), 431–457.
Clayton, M. (2012). On widening participation in higher education through positive discrimination. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(3), 414–431.
DfES. (2003). Consultation: Classification of special education needs. London: DfES.
Do, P., Parry, J., Mathers, J., & Richardson, M. (2006). Monitoring the widening participation initiative for access to medical school: Are present measures sufficient? Medical Education, 40(8), 750–758.
Douglas, G., Travers, J., McLinden, M., Robertson, C., Smith, E., Macnab, N., Powers, S., Guldberg, K., McGough, A., O’Donnell, M., & Lacey, P. (2012). Measuring educational engagement, progress and outcomes for children with special educational needs: A review. Trim, Ireland: National Council for Special Education (NCSE). http://ncse.ie/research-reports
Erisman, W., & Looney, S. (2007). Opening the door to the American dream: Increasing higher education access and success for immigrants. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED497030.pdf
Florian, L., Rouse, M., Black-Hawkins, K., & Jull, S. (2004). What can national data sets tell us about inclusion and pupil achievement? British Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 115–121.
Gallagher, J., Niven, V., Donaldson, N., & Wilson, N. (2009). Widening access? Characteristics of applicants to medical and dental schools, compared with UCAS. British Dental Journal, 207, 433–445.
Gill, T., & Benton, T. (2015). The accuracy of forecast grades for OCR A levels (Cambridge Assessment Statistics Report Series no.90). http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/243087-the-accuracy-of-forecast-grades-for-ocr-a-levels-in-june-2014.pdf
Gorard, S. (2008). Who is missing from higher education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 421–437.
Gorard, S. (2012). Who is eligible for free school meals?: Characterising FSM as a measure of disadvantage in England. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1003–1017.
Gorard, S. (2013). An argument concerning overcoming inequalities in higher education, Chapter 11. In N. Murray & C. Klinger (Eds.), Aspirations, access and attainment in widening participation: International perspectives and an agenda for change. London: Routledge.
Gorard, S. (2015, October 17). The easy way to help kids born in summer keep up at school. New Scientist, p. 29.
Gorard, S. (2016). Challenging perceptions of a north south regional divide in school performance in England, BERA Annual Conference, Leeds, September 2016.
Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2009). The impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in science. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 93–129.
Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2013). Overcoming disadvantage in education. London: Routledge.
Gorard, S., with Adnett, N., May, H., Slack, K., Smith, E., & Thomas, L. (2007). Overcoming barriers to HE. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Gorard, S., Boliver, V., Siddiqui, N., & Banerjee, P. (2017a). Which are the most suitable contextual indicators for use in widening participation to HE? (Research Papers in Education). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02671522.2017.1402083?needAccess=true
Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & Boliver, V. (2017b). An analysis of school-based contextual indicators for possible use in widening participation. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 101–118.
Harrison, N., & Hatt, S. (2009). Knowing the ‘unknowns’. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(4), 347–357.
Harrison, N., & McCraig, C. (2015). An ecological fallacy in higher education policy. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(6), 793–816.
HEFCE. (2013). Non-continuation rates at English HEIs: Trends for entrants 2005–06 to 2010–11. Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2013/201307/
Hoskins, S., Newstead, S., & Dennis, I. (1997). Degree performance as a function of age, gender, prior qualifications and discipline studies. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 317–328.
Lee, C. (2003). Why we need to re-think race and ethnicity in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 3–5.
Lucas, S. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690.
Moore, J., Mountford-Zimdars, A., & Wiggans, J. (2013). Contextualised admissions: Examining the evidence. Cheltenham: Supporting Professionalism in Admissions Programme.
Office for Fair Access. (2015). Strategic Plan: 2015–2020. Bristol: OFFA.
Pumfrey, P. (2008). Moving towards inclusion? The first-degree results of students with and without disabilities in higher education in the UK: 1998–2005. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(1), 31.
Salway, S., Allmark, P., Barley, R., Higinbottom, G., Gerrish, K., & Ellison, G. (2010). Researching ethnic inequalities. Social Research Update, 58, 1–4.
Strand, S. (2011). The limits of social class in explaining ethnic gaps in educational attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 197–229.
Supporting Professionalism in Admissions. (2015). SPA’s use of contextualised admissions survey report 2015 (with HEDIIP). Cheltenham: Supporting Professionalism in Admissions.
Tomlinson, S. (2012). The irresistible rise of the SEN industry. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 267–286.
Universities Scotland. (2016). Futures not backgrounds, Edinburgh: Universities Scotland. http://www.universities-scotland.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/10537-%E2%80%A2-Futures-Not-Backgrounds-web.pdf
Van Dorn, R., Bowen, G., & Blau, J. (2006). The impact of community diversity and consolidated inequality on dropping out of high school. Family Relations, 55, 105–118.
Williams, M., & Husk, K. (2012). Can we, should we, measure ethnicity? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(4), 285–300.
Woodfield, R. (2011). Age and first destination employment from UK universities: Are mature students disadvantaged? Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 409–425.
Woodfield, R. (2017). Undergraduate students who are required to withdraw from university: The role of ethnicity. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3259.
Yates, J., & James, D. (2013). The UK clinical aptitude test and clinical course performance at Nottingham: A prospective cohort study. BMC Medical Education, 13, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-32.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the ESRC: grant numbers ES/N012046/1and ES/N01166X/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gorard, S., Boliver, V., Siddiqui, N. (2018). How Can Contextualised Admissions Widen Participation?. In: Shah, M., McKay, J. (eds) Achieving Equity and Quality in Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Excellence and Equity in Global Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78316-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78316-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78315-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78316-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)