Skip to main content

Affirmative Actions as an Instrument to Balance Access to Superior Education in Brazil: The Quotas Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Achieving Equity and Quality in Higher Education

Abstract

Affirmative action has been widely used in Brazil as an important instrument for the implementation of the principle of equity, regarding access to higher education.

In addition to a number of laws that provide for affirmative action, it is important to note that the country’s Supreme Court has already affirmed the constitutionality of affirmative policies in higher education. In this sense, the present chapter aims to analyze one of the main manifestations of such affirmative actions: the quota policy, widely adopted in the most different universities in the country. The quota policy has shown important results in the equalization of opportunities to access higher education, making the university environment more heterogeneous and, above all, enabling the social rise of those historically relegated.The quota policy, one of the main affirmative actions used in Brazil, has shown interesting results in the short term, despite being designed to produce extemporaneous effects, equalizing historical inequalities inherent in the country.In this sense, although already adopted by public universities in an earlier moment, Law n. 12.711 / 2012 was published, which institutionalized the quota policy for all federal higher education, making said affirmative action become compulsory in this universe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A Brazilian–Portuguese denomination to the “mixed people”, the “brown” ones.

  2. 2.

    The PPIs is the acronym used to refer to certain skin color or ethnicity as the blacks (“pretos” in Portuguese), brown (the “pardos”) and indigenous (the índios”).

  3. 3.

    As well as those who have some disability.

  4. 4.

    In an exam called “vestibular”.

  5. 5.

    About this, BLATT states that “(…) poverty in Brazil has skin color, i.e., 44,1% of black population lived in household with less than half minimum wage per capita, while white people were 20,5%”. In: BLATT, Ivo. A universidade do século XXI: lugar de excluSao ou de incluSao social?UNIrevista, vol. 1, n 2, abril 2006. URI/UNISINOS, Available in: http://www.fw.uri.br/publicacoes/revistach/artigos/capitulo_9.pdf.

  6. 6.

    The latest full data in this topic.

  7. 7.

    “Men is different from all living beings, but stating that is not enough without real differences. They pursue a dignified existence which is one where all human conditions are respected . However, for this to happen, it is needed to recognize some rights. Therefore, all rights axiomatically related to a person is a fundamental right”. Effting, op. cit., p. 38.

  8. 8.

    See also articles 3°, III and IV, 5°, head provision, I and XLI, 7°, XXX and XXXI, 170, 193, 196 and 205.

  9. 9.

    The Author uses as an example a hypothetical situation of a public position competitive exam: “Assume that this exam is under supervision of research institutions and also evaluates physical abilities which will be used in measurements and studies of black people’s sport specialty. It is obvious that white people will not be permitted to apply for this exam. And there will be no violation against the principle of isonomy excluding other people than the black ones. The proposed research, perfectly valid, justify the hypothetical differentiation. In order to do it, the government would not be obliged to do the same research with white, yellow or red people, or if extended to any of these races, to any race that is not provided in the exam” (Bandeira de Mello 2012, pp. 15–16).

  10. 10.

    That is why it is not possible to create restricted benefits for foreign groups instead of the national ones, even if those have, as a specified differentiation, high academic or technical qualifications because a situation like that violates the principle of an Independent State as provided in article 171, §§1° e 2°, of the Federal Constitution (Bandeira de Mello 2012, p. 43).

  11. 11.

    “Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental” one of the possible direct actions of constitutionality.

  12. 12.

    And so not included in the federal budget.

  13. 13.

    According to the 2010 census, the last one made.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rubens Becak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Becak, R., Cirino, L.F. (2018). Affirmative Actions as an Instrument to Balance Access to Superior Education in Brazil: The Quotas Policy. In: Shah, M., McKay, J. (eds) Achieving Equity and Quality in Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Excellence and Equity in Global Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78316-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78316-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78315-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78316-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics