Skip to main content

Conceptualising Equality, Equity and Differentiation in Marketised Higher Education: Fractures and Fault Lines in the Neoliberal Imaginary

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Equality and Differentiation in Marketised Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter explores the extent to which policy changes designed to stimulate the marketisation of English higher education (HE) have changed the nature of the enterprise. It identifies emerging trajectories and explores how various aspects of marketisation impact on system differentiation and the possibilities of a more equitable HE. It identifies consistencies in relation to the continuing transfer of the burden of costs from the state to the individual and in the growth of ‘academic capitalism’, first identified by Slaughter and Leslie almost 20 years ago. It also identifies contradictions at the heart of neoliberal reform of HE, which include elite conceptions of the role of HE alongside a neoliberal positioning which views the HE market as sufficient to ensure fair access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Biblical reference to Matthew 25:29: ‘For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.’

References

  • Archer, L. (2007). Diversity, equality and higher education: A critical reflection on the ab/uses of equity discourse within widening participation. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5–6), 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2017, November 13). Panorama: Student loans scandal. www.bbc.co.uk

  • Bekhradnia, B. (2003). Widening participation and fair access: An overview of the evidence. London: Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI).

    Google Scholar 

  • DBIS (Department for Business, Industry and Skills). (2015). Fulfilling our potential: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: DBIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • DBIS (Department for Business, Industry and Skills). (2016). Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: DBIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • DBIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2011a). Higher education: Students at the heart of the system (Cm 8122). London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • DBIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2011b). Ensuring higher education is open to all. www.gov.uk/government/news/ensuring-higher-education-is-open-to-all. Accessed 3 Jan 2015.

  • DFE (Department for Education). (2017). Securing student success: Risk-based regulation for teaching excellence, social mobility and informed choice in higher education. https://consult.education.gov.uk/higher-education/higher-education-regulatory-framework/supporting_documents/HE%20reg%20framework%20condoc%20FINAL%2018%20October%20FINAL%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2017.

  • DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2003). The future of higher education. Norwich: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). (1994). Overview of recent developments in HE. Bristol: HEFCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). (2000). Diversity in higher education: HEFCE Policy Statement. Bristol: HEFCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2017). Higher Education and Research Act. Norwich: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. (2000). Diversity and marketisation of higher education: Incompatible concepts? Higher Education Policy, 13, 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for Fair Access. (2011). How to Produce an Access Agreement for 2012–13: Guidance. Bristol: OFFA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2006). Changing structures of the higher education systems: The increasing complexity of underlying forces. Higher Education Policy, 19, 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UCAS. (2016). 2016 application cycle: End of cycle report. Cheltenham: UCAS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin McCaig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCaig, C., Bowl, M., Hughes, J. (2018). Conceptualising Equality, Equity and Differentiation in Marketised Higher Education: Fractures and Fault Lines in the Neoliberal Imaginary. In: Bowl, M., McCaig, C., Hughes, J. (eds) Equality and Differentiation in Marketised Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Excellence and Equity in Global Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78313-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78313-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78312-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78313-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics