Advertisement

Facebook and Informal Learning

  • George CallaghanEmail author
  • Ian Fribbance
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the social media tool Facebook through the lens of teaching theory. We reflect in detail on the challenges such social media present to those working in Higher Education. The chapter begins with a review of the literature surrounding social theory of learning, particularly on the debates around informal learning. This is followed by a discussion of social media in Higher Education. Data from the Faculty Facebook page is used to illustrate how this technology stimulates and encourages informal learning. We go on to take a critical perspective to explore the ethical and practical challenges of using commercially controlled software within an HE environment. The concluding section then presents a summary and points to useful areas of future research.

Keywords

Informal learning Facebook and education Social media and education Social theory of learning Online learning 

References

  1. Bilton, N. (2010). I live in the future & here’s how it works: Why your world, work, and brain are being creatively disrupted. New York: Crown, Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Callaghan, G., & Fribbance, I. ( 2016). The use of Facebook to build a community for distance learning students: A case study from the Open University. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(3), 260–272. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02680513.2016.1229176?journalCode=copl20 Accessed 27 Sept 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 87–100.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Pennsylvania State University. http://library.um.ac.id/images/stories/ebooks/Juni10/democracy%20and%20education%20-%20john%20dewey.pdf. Accessed 24 Aug 2016.
  6. Guardian. (2015). Social media overtakes entertainment as favorite online activity. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/sep/02/social-media-overtakes-entertainmemt-as-favourite-online-activity. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
  7. Guy, R. (2012). The use of social media for academic practice: A review of literature. Kentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice, 1(2), 1–20. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=kjhepp. Accessed 18Aug 2015.
  8. Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jakovljevic, M., Buckley, S., & Bushney, M. (2013). Forming communities of practice in higher education: A theoretical perspective. In Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference, Croatia. http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-02-4/papers/ML13-368.pdf. Accessed 31Jan 2017.
  10. Kent, M., & Leaver, T. (2014). An education in Facebook? Croydon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis, H. (2016). Did fake news on Facebook swing the US election? New Statesman. http://www.newstatesman.com/world/2016/11/did-fake-news-facebook-swing-us-election. Accessed 24 Nov 2016.
  13. Liu, Y. (2010). Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89(spring), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marsick, V. J., Watkins, K. E., Callahan, M. W., & Volpe, M. (2006). Reviewing theory and research on informal and incidental learning, online submission. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492754.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2016.
  18. Naughton, J. (2016, July 3). Few news providers with now by liking Facebook. Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/03/facebook-journalism-news-feeds-partisan-politics. Accessed 8 June 2016.
  19. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. London: Viking/Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pew Research Centre. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2016. http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
  21. Rheingold, H. (2010). Attention, and other 21st-century social media literacies. EDUCAUSE Review, 45(5), 14–24.Google Scholar
  22. Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, J. (2013). Learning journeys: The road from informal to formal learning – The UK Open University’s Approach. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2. http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2013-08/. Accessed 23 June 2016.
  24. Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – A literature review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Veletsianos, G. (2016). Social media in academia: Networked scholars. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Viner, K. (2016, July 12). How technology disrupted the truth. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jul/12/how-technology-disrupted-the-truth. Accessed 13 July 2016.
  27. Walton, G., Gwyer, R., & Stubbings, R. (2012). The road to information literacy: Librarians as facilitators of learning. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming academic practice. Bloomsbury Open Access. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/the-digital-scholar-how-technology-is-transforming-scholarly-practice/. Accessed 7 July 2016.
  29. Weller, M. (2013). The battle for open – a perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (3). http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2013-15/. Accessed 24 June 2016.
  30. Wenger, E. C. (2008). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (18th printing, first published 1998). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/09-10-27-CoPs-and-systems-v2.01.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2016.
  32. Wenger, E. C., & Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsOpen UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts and Social ScienceOpen UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations