Making Online Teams Work
Contemporary graduates are expected to be adept at working collaboratively; however, enabling students to acquire the necessary skills is particularly challenging in an online context. This study uses empirical research involving tutor and tutor perspectives to investigate barriers to successful online team work. Poor group dynamics are frequently an area of concern for students and this study analysed written communication between group members when solving puzzles. The results led us to propose that, in the online environment, tutors and students need time, opportunity and motivation to adopt the social constructionist approach, rather than relying on the information transmission model. We conclude by emphasizing that, in any teaching model, strategic planning should include resources to nurture collaborative skills for students and their tutors.
KeywordsCollaboration Online teamworking Online teams Social constructionism Online teaching Online learning
- Andresen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. Educational Technology and Society, 12(1), 249–258.Google Scholar
- British Psychological Society. (2015). Standards for the accreditation of undergraduate, conversion and integrated Masters programmes in psychology. http://www.bps.org.uk/system/files/Public%20files/PaCT/Undergraduate%20Accreditation%202016_WEB.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2017.
- Brown, R. (2000). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, C., Graham, M., & Scarborough, H. (2001). Developing an asynchronous learning network. Educational Technology and Society, 4(4), 39–47.Google Scholar
- Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices. (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hiltz, S. R., Turoff, M., & Harasim, L. (2007). Development and philosophy of the field of asynchronous learning networks. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The sage handbook of E-learning research. Los Angeles/London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kear, K. (2010). Collaboration via online discussion forums: Issues and approaches. In H. Donelan, K. Kear, & M. Ramage (Eds.), Online communication and collaboration. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- MacDonald, J. (2006). Blended learning and online tutoring: A good practice guide. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
- Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Oliver, M., & Shaw, G. P. (2003). Asynchronous discussion in support of medical education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 56–67.Google Scholar
- Piezon, S. L., & Donaldson, R. L. (2005). Online groups and social loafing: Understanding student-group interactions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter84/piezon84.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2017.
- QAA. (2016). Subject benchmark statement: Psychology. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/SBS-Psychology-16.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2017.
- Reddy, P., Lantz, C., & Hulme, J. (2013). Employability in psychology: A guide for departments. York: Higher Education Academy. tinyurl.com/kthejrs. Accessed 18 Jan 2017.