Abstract
This chapter considers whether the civil service can prevent a government from implementing radical policies and examines the power of the elected politician versus the appointed official. It describes how the Foreign Office tried to persuade Labour ministers against imposing sanctions on the Pinochet regime. The Wilson and Callaghan governments, under pressure from trade unions, human rights campaigners and the Chile Solidarity Campaign, nevertheless imposed a series of measures that can be seen as an early example of ‘ethical’ foreign policy—an arms embargo, the cutting of export credits, the welcoming of refugees and the withdrawal of the British ambassador in Santiago. The chapter also explores the informal social networks between government officials and the private sector in Britain, as well as links between British diplomats, the pro-Pinochet business community and military officers in Chile. It also looks at the Rolls Royce workers’ boycott in East Kilbride, an example of trade union action changing government foreign policy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Livingstone, G. (2018). Ethical Foreign Policy? Labour Versus the Foreign Office (1974–1979). In: Britain and the Dictatorships of Argentina and Chile, 1973–82. Security, Conflict and Cooperation in the Contemporary World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78292-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78292-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78291-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78292-8
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)