Abstract
The development of geothermal energy can be hindered by both technical and socio-economic issues. Technical issues are associated with the intrinsic characteristics of geothermal energy and the ways in which is exploited, whereas socio-economic ones arise from the interplay between companies and stakeholders, affected to some extent in the development of geothermal energy. In this contribution, we analysed possible determinants of the relationship between companies and citizens. On the one hand, citizens represent a key stakeholder for energy companies that want to develop a geothermal energy facility. On the other hand, they represent the potential end users of technology providers’ products. Accordingly, geothermal energy companies and technology providers are called upon to take action for involving citizens and overcome the related tensions with them. In particular, geothermal energy companies need to face social acceptance issues when developing geothermal energy facilities. In order to achieve a better understanding of these issues, we have analysed suitable strategies and practices from the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) perspective, which is becoming a common reference point for geothermal energy companies that need to manage stakeholders’ involvement. Technology providers, instead, aim at fostering the adoption of geothermal energy systems at building level. In order to investigate the related dynamics, in this chapter we present an analysis of the most popular promotion and risk sharing strategies and practices that are in place among geothermal players. Among such strategies and practices, two themes emerged as key blocks for citizens’ involvement: information and trust. By comparing CSR, promotion and risk sharing strategies and actions, we provide energy companies and technology providers with some suggestions to achieve local acceptance of geothermal facilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajzen I (2011) The theory of planned behavior: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health 26:1113–1127
Ajzen I, Joyce N, Sheikh S, Cote NG (2011) Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: the role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 33(2):101–117
Allen CT (1982) Self-perception based strategies for stimulating energy conservation. J Consum Res 8(4):381–390
Benites-Lazaro LL, Mello-Théry NA (2017) CSR as a legitimatizing tool in carbon market: evidence from Latin America’s Clean Development Mechanism. J Clean Prod 149:218–226
Bleicher A, Gross M (2016) Geothermal heat pumps and the vagaries of subterranean geology: energy independence at a household level as a real-world experiment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64:279–288
Carr-Cornish S, Romanach L (2014) Differences in public perceptions of geothermal energy technology in Australia. Energies 7(3):1555–1575
Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2011) Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: overcoming the trust barrier. Manag Sci 57(9):1528–1545
Ekins P (2004) Step changes for decarbonizing the energy system: research needs for renewables, energy efficiency and nuclear power. Energy Policy 32:1891–1904
ENEL (2016) Seeding energies—Bilancio di Sostenibilità. ENEL
Eurobarometer (2011) Special Eurobarometer 372: climate change. European Commission, Brussels. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_372_en.pdf. Accessed 06.08.12.
European Commission (2001) Corporate social responsibility.Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporatesocial-responsibility/index_en.htm
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
Hall N, Ashworth P, Devine-Wright P (2013) Societal acceptance of wind farms: analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy 58:200–208
Hur WM, Kim H, Woo J (2014) How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. J Bus Ethics 125(1):75–86
Hyysalo S, Johnson M, Juntunen JK (2017) The diffusion of consumer innovation in sustainable energy technologies. J Clean Prod 162:S70–S82
IEA (2017) Key World Energy Statistics. IEA, Paris
Insightrix Research Inc. (2011) IPAC CO2 Research Inc. Public awareness and acceptance of carbon capture and storage in Canada. Saskatchewan, Canada
Karytsas S, Theodoropoulou H (2014a) Public awareness and willingness to adopt ground source heat pumps for domestic heating and cooling. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:49–57
Karytsas S, Theodoropoulou H (2014b) Socioeconomic and demographic factors that influence publics’ awareness on the different forms of renewable energy sources. Renew Energy 71:480–485
Kubota H, Hondo H, Hienuki S, Kaieda H (2013) Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs. Energy Policy 61:1079–1087
Matten D, Moon J (2008) ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33:404–424
Moncrieff L (2015) Karl Polanyi and the problem of corporate social responsibility. J Law Soc 42(3):434–459
Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Market 58(3):20–38
Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2008) Normative social influence is under detected. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34(7):913–923
Pellizzone A, Allansdottir A, De Franco R, Muttoni G, Manzella A (2017) Geothermal energy and the public: a case study on deliberative citizens’ engagement in central Italy. Energy Policy 101:561–570
PWC (2016) Redefining business success in a changing world—CEO survey. PwC
Rizzi F, Frey M (2014) Sustainable co–evolution of environmental regulation and oligopolies: moving towards a managerial theory of meta–organisational approaches. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 8(3):270–289
Ruggie J (2008) Taking embedded liberalism global: the corporate connection. In: Ruggie J (ed) Embedding Global Markets: an Enduring Challenge. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire, pp 231–254
Sachs S, Rühli E (2011) Stakeholders matter—a new paradigm for strategy in society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2011) The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. J Manag Stud 48:899–931
Sidhoum AA, Serra T (2017) Corporate social responsibility and dimensions of performance: an application to US electric utilities. Util Policy 48:1–11
Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610
Swaen V, Chumpitaz RC (2008) Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust. Recherche Appl Market (Engl Ed) 23(4):7–34
UN (2016) UN Climate Change—Paris Agreement. Retrieved from UN framework convention on climate change. Available at: http://newsroom.unfccc.int/paris-agreement/175-states-sign-paris-agreement/
Utting P (2005) Rethinking business regulation: from self-regulation to social control (No 15). Technology, Business and Society, Geneva
Van Der Schoor T, Scholtens B (2015) Power to the people: local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:666–675
Witzling L, Shaw B, Amato MS (2015) Incorporating information exposure into a theory of planned behavior model to enrich understanding of pro-environmental behavior. Sci Commun 37(5):551–574
Yun S, Lee J (2015) Advancing societal readiness toward renewable energy system adoption with a socio-technical perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change 95:170–181
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Contini, M., Annunziata, E., Rizzi, F., Frey, M. (2019). Business Strategies in Geothermal Energy Market: A Citizens-Based Perspective. In: Manzella, A., Allansdottir, A., Pellizzone, A. (eds) Geothermal Energy and Society. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78286-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78286-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78285-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78286-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)