Abstract
In the last years the number and the magnitude of the oppositions to new public (and private) works have increased all over the World, but the reasons of the op-position are difficult to identify. There are several international examples of conflicts originating from environ-mental oppositions as the mobilization in Istanbul in defense of Gezi park, the toppling of the government in Madagascar over land-grabbing, and the aboriginal ‘Idle No More’ movement in Canada against fracking activities. In Italy the most famous environmental conflict is the opposition to High Speed Rail in Val di Susa, but recently the referendum on the drilling in the Mediterranean sea has seen a very huge opposition front which includes also influential member of Catholic Clergy. But at the same time similar works didn’t face any (or so hard) opposition in different areas and periods. So we can hypnotize that the conflict is site specific but what are the determinants of the conflict? Can we explain the relevance of the conflict with the territorial vulnerability? How can the vulnerability be measured? What are the main dimensions of vulnerability? Several scientists analysed the relationships between the oppositions, which can degenerate in conflict, even violent, and the vulnerability of the territories where the public works are planned. The aim of the present paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the recent ad most relevant scientific papers which study the relationship between vulnerability and conflict by means of a bibliographic approach. Bibliometric approaches analyze scholarly publications and scientific production through various quantitative techniques, with the main goal of revealing how different research topic and specific scientific domains are conceptually and intellectually structured. Bibliometrics borrows the information it needs directly from the bibliographic description of scientific documents, available for download on several databases. The bibliographical data gathered in this study was collected from 682 articles from a wide range of journals available in the Thomson Reuters’ ISI Web of Knowledge; the search criteria included the joint appearance of the terms “vulnerability” and “conflict”. For the purpose of this research different methods have been employed to map the scientific production and to gather information about this research topic. The results of the analysis show an increasing interest in studying the relationship between conflict and vulnerability and the extension of the semantic context including several scientific fields.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global environmental change 16(3):268–281
Barde JP, Gerelli E (1980) Economia e Politica dell’ambiente. Il Mulino, Bologna
Barnett J, Adger WN (2007) Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political Geogr 26(6):639–655
Borrelli G, Citterio M (2016) Environmental sustainability: from theory to practice. The contribution of the Laudato si’ encyclical. Valori e Valutazioni 17:9–12
Bottero M (2014) L’Analisi Multicriteri. Intervista a Bernard Roy, Valori e valutazioni 13:7–23
Cutter S, Boruff B, Shirley W (2003a) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Quart 84:242–261
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003b) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261
Damart S, Roy B (2009) The uses of cost–benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France. Trans Policy 16:200–212
De Solla Price DJ (1965) Networks of scientific papers. Science 149(3683):510 LP-515. Retrieved from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/149/3683/510.abstract
Elinor O (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action
Encyclical Letter (2015) Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis on care for our common home
Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122(3159):108 LP-111. Retrieved from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/122/3159/108.abstract
Garfield E, Sher IH (1993) Keywords plusTM—algorithmic derivative indexing. J Am Soc Inf Sci 44(5):298
Homer-Dixon TF (1994) Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: evidence from cases. Int Secur 19(1):5–40
Homer-Dixon TF (2010) Environment, scarcity, and violence. University Press, Princeton
Martinez-Alier J, Kallis Giorgos, Veuthey S, Walter M, Temper L (2010) Social metabolism, ecological distribution conflicts, and valuation languages. Ecol Econ 20(1):58–87
Menoni S, Molinari D, Parker D, Ballio F, Tapsell S (2012) Assessing multi faceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies. Nat Hazards 64:2057–2082
Mishan E (1965) Relections on a recent development in the concept of external effects. Can J Political Econ 31:3–34
Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U (2005) Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Springer, Netherlands, Netherlands
Mondini G (2016) Integrated assessment for the mangement of new social challenges. Valori e Valutazioni 17:15–18
Noyons ECM, Moed HF, Luwel M (1999) Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: a bibliometric study. J Am Soc Inf Sci 50(2):115–131
O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Nygaard LP, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7(1):73–88
Oppio A, Corsi S, Mattia S, Tosini A (2015) Exploring the relationship among local conflicts and territorial vulnerability: the case study of Lombardy Region. Land Use Policy 43:239–247
Oppio A, Corsi S, Torrieri F, Mattia S (2017) Infrastructure development and territorial vulnerability, the role of composite indicators for addressing siting decisions. Green Energy Technol Issue 9783319496757:277–290
Pham HV, Torre A (2012) La décision publique à l’épreuve des conflits. Un cadre d’analyse des processus décisionnels au regard de l’expression des oppositions, Revue d’économie industrielle 138:93–126
Pigou AC (1948) The Economics of wellfare. McMillan, London
Roegen G (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard UniversityPress, Cambridge
Small HG (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 24(4):265–269
Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environ Change 16(3):282–292
Söderholm P (2001) the deliberative approach in environmental valuation. J Econ Issues 35(2):487–495
Spash CL (2000) Multiple value expression in contingent valuation: economics and ethics. Environ Sci Technol 34(8):1433–1438
Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc National Acad Sci 100(14):8074–8079
Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2014) Measuring scholarly impact. In: Ding Y et al (eds) measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice, pp 285–320. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8
Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Corsi, S., Ruggeri, G., Oppio, A. (2018). Territorial Vulnerability and Local Conflicts. In: Mondini, G., Fattinnanzi, E., Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Stanghellini, S. (eds) Integrated Evaluation for the Management of Contemporary Cities. SIEV 2016. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78270-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78271-3
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)