Skip to main content

Intergenerational Justice in the Evaluation of Urban Regeneration Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Integrated Evaluation for the Management of Contemporary Cities (SIEV 2016)

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

This contribution highlights the complexity of the problem of evaluation of urban regeneration projects, with reference to the time variable and to the impacts of ethical nature and social justice related to the concept of sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abram S (2007) Living through regeneration— capturing multiple stakeholder perceptions to enrich the qualitative research methods curriculum. CEBE Trans 4(2):67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Age UK (Undated) Engaging with older people: evidence review, Age UK. http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/For-professionals/Research/Evidence_Review_Engagement_with_Older_People.pdf?dtrk=true

  • Agger A, Norvig L (2009) Exclusion in area-based urban policy programmes. Eur Plan Stud 17(7):1085–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon P, Lombardi P (2005) Evaluating sustainable development. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon P, Lombardi P, Shen G (eds) (2017) Future challenges in evaluating and managing sustainable development in the built environment, Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A (ed) (1999) Fairness and futurity: essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett W, Ellingham I (2013) Whole Life Sustainability. RIBA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Habitat III (2016) United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2016). Policies on spatial distribution and urbanization: data booklet (ST/ESA/ SER.A/394)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales C, Hewitt CN, Jankovic L, Jefferson I, Leach J, Mackenzie AR, Memon F, Pugh TAM, Sadler JP, Wein-Gaertner C, Whyatt JD, Rogers CDF (2012) Using scenarios to explore urban UK futures: a review of the literature 1997 to 2011. In: Lombardi D, Barnes M, MacKenzie AR (eds) Designing resilient cities: a guide to good practice, HIS BRE Press, Bracknell

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey-Eddie T, Murusuri N, Moure CJ (2011) Engaging local communities in world heritage sites: experience from the community management for protected areas program. In: Weber S (ed) (2012) Rethinking protected areas in a changing world: proceedings of the 2011 George Wright Society biennial conference on parks, protected areas, and cultural sites. Hancock, Michigan, The George Wright Society, pp 131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey RJ, Le Menestrel M, Arenas D, Rauschmayer F, Rode J (2014) Enriching intergenerational decision making with guided visualization exercises. J Bus Ethics 122(4):675–680

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Inter-governmental panel on climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change/Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2002) Involving young people in local authority decision-making, JRF Findings 632, JRF, New York. https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/involving-young-people-local-authority-decision-making

  • LombardI P, Cooper I (2009) The challenge of the e-Agora metrics: the social construction of meaningful measurements. Int J Sustain Dev 12(2/3/3):210–222. ISSN 0960–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi P, Cooper I (2016) Inter-generational justice: time to tackle our evaluation practice? In: VALORI E VALUTAZIONI dei tipografia genio civile, pp 5, pagine 19–23. ISSN: 2036–2404

    Google Scholar 

  • NEAFO (2014) The national ecosystems approach toolkit, tools: applications, benefits and linkages for ecosystems (TABLES) project, UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow On (NEAFO), http://neat.ecosystemsknowledge.net/index.html

  • Pope Francis (2015) Encyclical Letter “Laudato Si’”, of The Holy Father Francis, on care for our common home, May 2015. http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encycli-cals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-lauda-to-si.html

  • Stenberg J (2004) Planning in interplace? On time, power and learning in local activities aiming at social inclusion and sustainable development. Department of Built Environment and Sustainable Development, Chalmers Architecture, Goteborg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • The Collins English Dictionary (2000) https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/time

  • Turok I, Kearns A, Goodlad R (1999) Social exclusion: in what sense a planning problem? The town planning review, Vol 70, No 3, A national spatial planning framework for the UK (Jul 1999), pp 363–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World Bank (2015) World development indicators 2015. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) Global initiative for resources efficient cities, Paris, France. France, Paris, United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from http://unep.org/

  • UNEP (2015) United Nations Environment Programme: Annual Report 2015 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), https://www.unenvironment.org/annualreport/2015/en/index.html

  • Van Hulst M (2012) Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning. Plan Theory 11(3):299–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, CD-ROM edition. UNEP, 2012; IPCC, 2014; UNEP, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future. Brundtland Report (1987) Oxford, Oxford University Press. p 27. ISBN 019282080X

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Lombardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lombardi, P., Cooper, I. (2018). Intergenerational Justice in the Evaluation of Urban Regeneration Projects. In: Mondini, G., Fattinnanzi, E., Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Stanghellini, S. (eds) Integrated Evaluation for the Management of Contemporary Cities. SIEV 2016. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78270-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78271-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics