Skip to main content

A Green District to Save the Planet

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integrated Evaluation for the Management of Contemporary Cities (SIEV 2016)

Abstract

The Earth (Mother and Sister, according to Encyclical Letter) cries out to us because of the harm we have inflicted on her by our irresponsible use and abuse of the Earth’s goods (Laudato si’, 2) and calls all people to global ecological conversion in key sectors, such as excessive energy consumption in urban areas and buildings and the consequent additional pollution. This research is devoted to answer the encyclical’s call by conceiving, designing and experimenting experiences of related to the Green City and Green Building. It deals with energy consumption in urban and construction management and CO2 emissions. Through the establishment of a specific methodology and experimentation on unprecedented city and district scales, the study compares energy consumption and CO2 reduction of different scenarios of interventions based on the main pillars of Green Conservation and Ecological Retrofitting. A Valuation Framework, enabled by Web-GIS tools, supports the present research, to integrate: unprecedentedly detailed 3D city-modelling; alternative scenarios (Sustainable vs. Business-as-Usual BAS) for whole-city energy management; cost estimates for investments in alternative urban scenarios; valuation of energy management in an alternative scenarios; overtime economic and financial analysis, comparing various scenarios.

  • case study: a real-world design and social experimentations have been activated in Reggio Calabria (Italy) and Boston (USA). Two case studies constitute two case studies. The first one is going to be implemented in the real world as an experiment entitled <Sustainable Urban District Retrofitting> in an urban neighborhood whose features include: 6,400 residents; 490,000 m2 of total area; 125 urban blocks; 840 buildings; 2,500,000 m3 of constructions; 800,000 m2 of apartments; around 6,600 apartment units.

The key outcome of real-world experimentation is the “ecological passivation” (i.e., insulation works and material for non-consumption of energy).

A global appraisal of experimentation provides valuation of the economic and ecological aspects quantifying the initial slightly higher costs of passivation and assessing the number of years needed to pay-back the additional cost of investment by the offset of a large saving in ongoing energy spending. It has been demonstrated, both theoretically and practically, that it is possible to reduce energy consumption up to 50%. Attributions: Massimo D. E. par. 2, 7. Musolino M. par. 5, 6. Malerba A. par. 1, 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bottero M, Mondini G (2016) Evaluation of social benefits of urban regeneration: a stated preferences approach. In: 9th international conference on innovation in urban and regional planning, Torino, pp 447–452, 14–15 Sept 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottero M, Mondini G (2017) Assessing socio-economic sustainability of urban regeneration programs: an integrated approach. In: Bisello A, Vettorato D, Stephens R, Elisei P (eds) Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions. Springer, Berlin, pp 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottero M, Bravi M, Mondini G, Talarico A (2017) Building energy performance and real estate market value: an application of the spatial autoregressive (SAR) model. In: Stanghellini S, Morano P, Bottero M, Oppio A (eds) Appraisal: from theory to practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottero M, Mondini G, Oppio, A. (2016). Decision support systems for evaluating urban regeneration. Proc Soc Behav Sci 223:923–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2011) Smart cities in Europe. J Urban Technol 65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1535

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Fifth assessment report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats GH (2010) Greening our built World. Costs, benefits and strategies. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 1–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi P (2016) Challenging the energy security paradigm. In: Lombardi P, Gruenig M (eds) Low-carbon energy security from a European perspective. Elsevier, London, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi P (2017a) Transition towards a Post Carbon City—does resilience matter? In: Future challenges in evaluating and managing sustainable development in the built environment/Brandon, Lombardi, Shen. Wiley, London, pp 55–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi P (2017b) Evaluating the smart and sustainable built environment in urban planning. In: Handbook of research on social, economic, and environmental sustainability in the development of smart cities/Andrea Vesco (Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy) and Francesco Ferrero (Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy). IGI Global, pp 44–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Luay ND, Kherun NA (2015) Green buildings cost premium: a review of empirical evidence. Energy Build 110:396–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L (2012) Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build 55:889–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE et al (2008) The role of GIS in the protection of Cultural Heritage. In: Proceeding of 3rd chef meeting UNESCO. Cultural heritage protection against Flooding, Genova. Università di Genova, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Genova. Mimeo, 14–15 April 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE (2009a) Valuation of urban sustainability and building energy efficiency. A case study. Int J Sustain Develop 12(2–3–4):223–247. ISSN: 1460-6720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE et al (2009b) Risparmio energetico e paesaggio urbano. Recenti innovazioni e sperimentazioni valutative. In: Stanghellini S (ed) Energia, paesaggio, valori. Dei, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE (2009c) Architettura sostenibile e democrazia energetica. Risparmio annuo di kWh nel Quartiere Latino di Reggio Calabria. In: Neri G (ed) Forme dell’Energia. Edizioni Centro Stampa d’Ateneo, Reggio Calabria

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE et al (2010) Urban 3D for energy planning and management. Atti 6° Conferenza Nazionale in Informatica e Pianificazione Urbana e Territoriale. Input 2010. Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE et al (2011) Sustainable urbanism: ecological city versus urban decay and energy crisis. Zero-distance energy for sustainable latin quarter. In: Beguinot C (ed) The City Crises. The UN Priority of the XXI Century. Giannini Editore, Napoli, Italy, pp 778–780. ISBN: 978-88-7431-52-2-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE et al (2012) Stima del risparmio energetico a scala urbana con il supporto di strumenti GIS. In: Atti della 13a Conferenza Nazionale Utenti ESRI. Intelligenza del Territorio. Roma, 18–19.04.2012. ESRI Italia, Roma, Italy. CD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE, Musolino M, Malerba A (2017a) Complesso isolato abitativo passivato nel framework della Post Carbon City. In: Bottero M (ed) Valutazioni economiche e questione energetica. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE, Musolino M, Malerba A (2017b) Dal processo edilizio ai BIO materiali per la BIO sostenibilità urbana nature-based in un Circular Economy Framework. Sperimentazione ad un edificio universitario. In: Bottero M (ed) Valutazioni economiche e questione energetica. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo DE et al (2017c) Geographically Weighted Regression for the post carbon city and real estate market analysis: a case study. In: Bevilacqua C, Calabrò F, Della Spina L (eds) Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Berlin. ISSN: 2190-3018

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolino M, Massimo DE (2013) Mediterranean urban landscape. Integrated strategies for sustainable retrofitting of consolidated city. In: Sabiedriba, integracija, izglitiba”. ISSN: 1691-5887. Rezekne, SL—4600, Latvia (Lettonia)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spampinato G, Massimo DE et al (2017) Carbon sequestration by cork oak forests and raw material to built up post carbon city. In: Bevilacqua C, Calabrò F, Della Spina L (eds) Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Berlin. ISSN: 2190-3018

    Google Scholar 

  • Torabi MS, Lombardi P, Ugliotti FM, Osello A, Mutani G (2016a) BIM-GIS modelling for sustainable urban development. In: Newdist 339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Torabi MS, Mutani G, Lombardi P (2016b) GIS-based energy consumption model at the urban scale for the building stock. In: JRC conference and workshop reports, Paolo Bertoldi, European Union, Luxembourg, pp 56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2012) Buildings energy data book. Online Publication. www.energy.gov

  • Wang Q, Holmberg S (2014) A methodology to assess energy-demand savings and cost effectiveness of retrofitting in existing Swedish residential buildings. Sustain Cities Soc 14:254–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Enrico Massimo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Massimo, D.E., Musolino, M., Fragomeni, C., Malerba, A. (2018). A Green District to Save the Planet. In: Mondini, G., Fattinnanzi, E., Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Stanghellini, S. (eds) Integrated Evaluation for the Management of Contemporary Cities. SIEV 2016. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78271-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78270-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78271-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics