Skip to main content

Hiding Self on Facebook Sidebar Ticker, Surveillance, and Privacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Networks and Surveillance for Society

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

  • 715 Accesses

Abstract

We could think of sidebar ticker as the same function of sidewalk, where people post messages, share information, or upload photos is just like they talk, photograph, or jog on the street. People don’t feel being seen is offended when they are active down the street, but on social networks they feel different, mostly because they would expect Facebook as a virtual personal space. Unfortunately, it is public based on opinions of the court. Another concept to clarify is that public is not equivalent to “open to the public.” Facebook might create a public space, and users should realize that the surveillance to them is the same fact on social networks as in society. However, users still have the right to decide their own conducts and exclude others from arbitrary interference, access, collection, and data usage.

The structure of this chapter is divided into four parts: ticker and privacy settings, surveillance on Facebook, discussion on privacy and public, and open to the public. In conclusion, we might expect to monitor others, hiding self behind the screen. We might feel safety hiding self in the crowd. However, social networks should be understood as a digitalized society with interaction, instead of a private space alone. Thus, we have to understand what real surveillance on social networks is. In this way, we can truly and effectively exercise the right to privacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the case of Katz v. United States, US Supreme Court held that once the information is exposed to the public, the person possibly no longer has a reasonable expectation of privacy. In the case of Romano v. Steelcase, Inc., the court indicated clearly that, because the most important function of SNS is sharing personal lives on the Internet, there was no reasonable expectation of privacy. German Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG, Urteil vom 27.2.2008) recognized that there is no fundamental right to be interfered involved in this issue, when the police obtained the information from public Internet and open communications. The court also recognized another exception, in which the police directly participate in public communication networks and obtain something as evidences from there. No fundamental right to be interfered either.

  2. 2.

    “Phubbing is a term coined as part of a campaign by Macquarie Dictionary to describe the habit of snubbing someone in favor of a mobile phone.” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phubbing

  3. 3.

    Reference to Wang, Ming-Li: Information Privacy: A Contextualized Analysis. (in Chinese) Chung Yuan Financial & Economic Law Review. 32, 59–105 (2014), at 63. But this sentence is from Westin, A. F.: Privacy and Freedom 7 (1967).

  4. 4.

    Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 360 (1967).

  5. 5.

    Katz, 389 U.S. at 361 (Harland, J., concurring).

References

  1. Philosophy for Change: Foucault and Social Media: Life in a Virtual Panopticon., https://philosophyforchange.wordpress.com/2012/06/21/foucault-and-social-media-life-in-a-virtual-panopticon/. Last visited 18 Feb 2017

  2. Rayner, T.: Why Facebook and Twitter are the virtual Panopticons of our time, http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/philosopherszone/why-facebook-and-twitter-are-the-virtual-panopticons-of-our-time/5089494 Last visited 18 Feb 2017

  3. D. Brin, The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom? (Perseus Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Facebook Research., https://research.fb.com/three-and-a-half-degrees-of-separation/ Last visited 18 Feb 2017

  5. L. Morales, Social media evidence: What you post or tweet can and will be used against you in court of law. The Advoc. (Texas). 60, 32–43 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Facebook Ticker., https://www.facebook.com/help/255898821192992. Last visited 18 Feb 2017

  7. Facebook Privacy Police., https://www.facebook.com/privacy/explanation (last visited 18 Feb. 2017)

  8. Facebook adjusts controversial ‘real name’ policy in wake of criticism. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/15/facebook-change-controversial-real-name-policy. Last visited 18 Feb 2017

  9. H. Niedzviecki, The Peep Diaries: How We’re Learning to Love Watching Ourselves and Our Neighbors (City Lights Publishers, San Francisco, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New Edition. Translated by Alan Sheridan (Penguin, New York, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Facebook Privacy Settings and Tools, https://www.facebook.com/settings?tab=privacy&section=composer&view. Last visited 18 Feb 2017

  12. E.W. Sholl, Exhibit Facebook: The discoverability and admissibility of social media evidence. Tul. J. Tech. Intell. Prop 16, 207 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.-L. Wang, Information privacy: A contextualized analysis. (in Chinese) Chung Yuan Fin. Econ. Law Rev. 32, 59–105 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Solove, D.J., The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Nieenbaum, Privacy in Context: Technology Policy and the Integrity of Social Life (Stanford Law Books, California, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.-R. Yeh, Towards the spatial connotations of privacy: Contextual articulation of the basic rights by the grand justices. (in Chinese) Acad. Sinica Law J. 18, 1–40 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih Ping Chang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chang, C.P. (2019). Hiding Self on Facebook Sidebar Ticker, Surveillance, and Privacy. In: Özyer, T., Bakshi, S., Alhajj, R. (eds) Social Networks and Surveillance for Society. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78256-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78256-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78255-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78256-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics