Determination of Reaction Kinetics by Calorimetry

  • Lee D. Hansen
  • Mark K. Transtrum
  • Colette F. Quinn
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science book series (BRIEFSMOLECULAR)


Calorimetry has been used to measure rates of reaction since the late 1700s when Antoine Lavoisier used an ice calorimeter to measure the rate of heat produced by a guinea pig (Lavoisier and LaPlace 1780). In proving that respiration was simply a slow combustion, Lavoisier also measured the rates of consumption of oxygen and production of CO2. Lavoisier’s experiments demonstrate many of the advantages of calorimetry for kinetic measurements; rates can be measured directly and noninvasively in any media. Measurements of rates instead of measuring the amount of product accumulated over time (or of reactant lost) are faster, simpler, and more sensitive than most other methods, particularly for slow reactions. Aside from methods that count radioactive decay rates, heat conduction and power compensation calorimetry are the only methods that measure rates directly. Calorimetry has been shown to be capable of measuring rates of reactions with half-lives greater than 1000 years (Hansen 1996). Calorimetry makes no requirements of the system except that it fits within the reaction vessel and not react with any other materials in the reaction vessel. Systems can be gaseous, liquid, solid, or even a living organism, e.g., plant tissue, insects, microorganism cultures, and animals.


  1. Di Trani JM, Moitessier N, Mittermaier AK (2017) Measuring rapid time-scale reaction kinetics using isothermal titration calorimetry. Anal Chem 89:7022–7030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hansen LD (1996) Instrument selection for calorimetric drug stability studies. Pharm Tech 20(4):64–74Google Scholar
  3. Hansen LD (2000) Calorimetric measurement of the kinetics of slow reactions. Ind Eng Chem Res 39(10):3541–3549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansen LD, Lewis EA, Eatough DJ, Bergstrom RG, DeGraft-Johnson D (1988) Kinetics of drug decomposition by heat conduction calorimetry. Pharm Res 6(1):20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hansen CW, Hansen LD, Nicholson AD, Chilton MC, Thomas N, Clark J, Hansen JC (2011a) Correction for instrument time constant and baseline in determination of chemical kinetics. Int J Chem Kinetics 43(2):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansen LD, Transtrum MK, Quinn C, Demarse N (2016) Enzyme-catalyzed and binding reaction kinetics determined by titration calorimetry. Biochim Biophys Acta 1860(5):957–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lavoisier A, LaPlace P (1780) Memoire sur la chaleur, Memoires de l’Academie des Sciences, Paris (English translation: Gabriel ML, Fogel S (1955) Great experiments in biology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 85–93)Google Scholar
  8. Tapscott RE, Hansen LD, Lewis EA (1975) Calorimetric studies of stereoselective vanadyl(IV) tartrate reactions. J Inorg Nucl Chem 37:2517–2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Transtrum MK, Hansen LD, Quinn C (2015) Enzyme kinetics determined by single-injection isothermal titration calorimetry. Methods 76:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee D. Hansen
    • 1
  • Mark K. Transtrum
    • 2
  • Colette F. Quinn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics and AstronomyBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  3. 3.TA InstrumentsLindonUSA

Personalised recommendations