Effect of 3D Printing on Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Inorganic Geopolymer

  • Biranchi Panda
  • Nisar Ahamed Noor Mohamed
  • Ming Jen Tan
Conference paper


The inorganic polymer, e.g. geopolymer, is well known as a green construction material with its remarkable mechanical and durability properties compared to other ceramic and Portland cement-based materials. It is worth promising to explore such geopolymer properties processed by a recent innovative technology, i.e. 3D concrete printing, which has established its ground in the construction industry. This study is focused on examining the directional effect of 3D printing process on compressive strengths of geopolymer mortar made from different industry by-products such as fly ash, slag, silica fume, etc. For a comparison, the same geopolymer mix was casted and cured in ambient temperature prior to its mechanical test with printed samples. Results from experimental tests revealed an anisotropy in the compressive strengths caused due to layered deposition of the geopolymer mortar.



The authors would like to acknowledge National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF) and Sembcorp Design and Construction Pte. Ltd. for funding this project.


  1. 1.
    Davidovits, J. (2008). Geopolymer chemistry and applications. Geopolymer Institute, Saint-Quentin, France.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davidovits, J., & Sawyer, J. L. (1985). U.S. Patent No. 4,509,985. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liew, Y. M., Heah, C. Y., & Kamarudin, H. (2016). Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: A review. Progress in Materials Science, 83, 595–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tay, Y. W. D., Panda, B., Paul, S. C., Mohamed, N. A. N., Tan, M. J., & Leong, K. F. (2017). 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: A review. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 12(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khoshnevis, B., Bukkapatnam, S., Kwon, H., & Saito, J. (2001). Experimental investigation of contour crafting using ceramics materials. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 7(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panda, B., Paul, S. C., Mohamed, N. A. N., Tay, Y. W. D., & Tan, M. J. (2017). Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar. Measurement, 113, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016). Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: Potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 11(3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panda, B., Paul, S. C., Hui, L. J., Tay, Y. W. D., & Tan, M. J. (2017). Additive manufacturing of geopolymer for sustainable built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Law, R., Gibb, A. G., & Thorpe, T. (2012). Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(3), 558–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panda, B., Paul, S. C., & Tan, M. J. (2017). Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material. Materials Letters, 209, 146–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Biranchi Panda
    • 1
  • Nisar Ahamed Noor Mohamed
    • 1
  • Ming Jen Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations