Feasibility Study of the Use of Polymer-Modified Cement Composites as 3D Concrete Printing Material

  • Kyu-Seok Yeon
  • Kwan-Kyu Kim
  • Jaeheum Yeon
Conference paper


Recently, a 3D printing process, also known as additive manufacturing, has been introduced in the construction industry as a means of increasing productivity. To apply this technology to construction, concrete, one of the most representative construction materials, must be used as the 3D printing material. Concrete is one of the key elements associated with 3D printing in construction. However, the research on concrete that considers the unique characteristics of 3D printing technology is currently insufficient. There are few studies that address the use of polymer-modified cement composite as a 3D concrete printing material. Thus, this research used preliminary tests to evaluate the feasibility of using a polymer-modified cement composite as a 3D concrete printing material. The polymer-modified cement composite was prepared using not only Portland cement, fly ash, blast furnace (BF) slag, and silica fume, but also a water-soluble polymer. Four fresh properties – flowability, extrudability, open time, and buildability – were evaluated, and it was determined that the addition of the polymer effectively improved the performance of 3D concrete printing materials.



This research was supported by a national R&D program via the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), and funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03930763).


  1. 1.
    Hwang, D., & Khoshnevis, B. (2005). An innovative construction process: Contour crafting. 22th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction, Ferrara, Italy.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khoshnevis, B., & Bekey, G. (2002). Automated construction using contour crafting: Applications on earth and beyond. 19th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buswell, R. A., Soar, R. C., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, A. (2007). Freeform construction: Mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction. Automation in Construction, 16, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malaeb, Z., Hachem, H., Tourbah, A., Maalouf, T., Zarwi, N. E., & Hamzeh, F. (2015). 3D concrete printing: Machine and design. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 6(6), 14–22.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beck, J., Fritz, B., Siewiorek, D. & Wiess, L. (1992). Manufacturing mechatronics using thermal spray shape deposition. Proceedings of the 1992 Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, (pp. 272–279) Austin, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gosselin, C., Duballet, R., Roux, P., Gaudilliѐre, N., Dirrenberger, J., & Morel, P. (2016). Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete: A new processing route for architects and builders. Materials and Design, 100, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tess (2017). US army 3D prints 512-sq-ft barracks using concrete AM tech developed in collaboration with NASA.
  8. 8.
    Bensoussan, H. (2016). Interviewing XtreeE: 3D printing concrete to push the limits of construction.
  9. 9.
    Chandra, S., & Ohama, Y. (1994). Polymers in concrete (pp. 111–135). CRC Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ford, G. S., & Souwak, L. J. (2017). The economic impact of the natural aggregates industry: A national, state, and county analysis (pp. 1–24). Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hager, I., Golonka, A., & Putanowicz, R. (2016). 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction. Procedia Engineering, 151, 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cesaretti, G., Dini, E., Kestelier, X. D., & Colla, V. (2014). Building components for an outpost on the lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology. Acta Astronautica, 93, 430–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Law, R., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012). Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Materials and Structures, 45, 1221–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASTM C1437-15. (2015). Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM C191-13. (2013). Standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic cement by vicat needle. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    BS. (1881). Part 102 (1983). Method for determination of slump. London: BS Standard.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Warszawski, A., & Navon, R. (1998). Implementation of robotics in buildings: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Regional Infrastructure EngineeringKangwon National UniversityChuncheonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Jungbu Business DivisionKorea Conformity LaboratoriesPocheonSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Engineering and TechnologyTexas A&M University-CommerceCommerceUSA

Personalised recommendations