The Effect of Glucose on the Properties of Cement Paste

Conference paper

Abstract

This study presents the results of an investigation of the effect of glucose on the hydration, microstructure, and properties of cement pastes. The hydration was studied using non-evaporable water content measurement and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Electrical resistivity as a measure of the transport property of cement pastes was evaluated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). It was found that all cement pastes showed a similar degree of hydration at late ages. The cement paste with a low concentration of glucose (0.05%) showed a slightly higher compressive strength and electrical resistivity compared to the control cement paste. This was most likely due to improved workability and dispersion of cement particles in this cement paste. However, the cement paste with 0.25% glucose showed a lower electrical resistivity compared to the control cement paste.

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas, N. L., & Birchall, J. D. (1983). The retarding action of sugars on cement hydration. Cement and Concrete Research, 13(6), 830–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hubler, M. H., Thomas, J. J., & Jennings, H. M. (2011). Influence of nucleation seeding on the hydration kinetics and compressive strength of alkali activated slag paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(8), 842–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Juenger, M. C. G., & Jennings, H. M. (2002). New insights into the effects of sugar on the hydration and microstructure of cement pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(3), 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peterson, V. K., & Juenger, M. C. G. (2006). Hydration of tricalcium silicate: Effects of CaCl2 and sucrose on reaction kinetics and product formation. Chemistry of Materials, 18(24), 5798–5804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bishop, M., & Barron, A. R. (2006). Cement hydration inhibition with sucrose, tartaric acid, and lignosulfonate: Analytical and spectroscopic study. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(21), 7042–7049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yasuda, S., Ima, K., & Matsushita, Y. (2002). Manufacture of wood-cement boards VII: Cement-hardening inhibitory compounds of hannoki (Japanese alder, Alnus japonica Steud.) Journal of Wood Science, 48(3), 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kochova, K., Schollbach, K., Gauvin, F., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (2017). Effect of saccharides on the hydration of ordinary Portland cement. Construction and Building Materials, 150, 268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Na, B., Wang, Z., Wang, H., & Lu, X. (2014). Wood-cement compatibility review. Wood Research, 59(5), 813–826.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neithalath, N., Weiss, J., & Olek, J. (2006). Characterizing enhanced porosity concrete using electrical impedance to predict acoustic and hydraulic performance. Cement and Concrete Research, 36(11), 2074–2085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations