Advertisement

Monstrous Dissections and Surgery as Performance: Gender, Race and the Bride of Frankenstein

  • Marie Mulvey-Roberts
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Science Fiction book series (SGSF)

Abstract

For creating his creature out of dead bodies, Victor Frankenstein makes use of dissection, described by William Lawrence as a ‘dirty source of knowledge’. Victor’s historical antecedents will be related to Mary Shelley’s circle and look ahead to Gunther von Hagens, known as Dr Death and a modern-day Frankenstein. Female dissection, such as that of nineteenth-century prophetess Joanna Southcott and Sarah Baartman, ‘the Hottentot Venus’, was regarded as particularly distasteful and this is mirrored in Victor’s tearing apart of the female monster. This dismemberment and fragmentation is re-membered and reconstituted in the work of French performance artist, ORLAN, who identifies herself as the Bride of Frankenstein. She uses surgery as a means of challenging inequalities of gender and race in a celebration of racial and sexual hybridity.

Works Cited

  1. Bynum, W.F., and Roy Porter, eds. 1985. William Hunter and the Eighteenth Century Medical-World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Castillo, David R. 2010. Baroque Horrors: Roots of the Fantastic in the Age of Curiosities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Crook, Nora, and Derek Guiton. 1986. Shelley’s Venomed Melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Helman, Cecil. 1991. The Body of Frankenstein’s Monster: Essays in Myth and Medicine. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  5. Hogg, Thomas Jefferson. 1858. The Life of Percy Bysshe Shelley, 2 Vols. London: Edward Moxon.Google Scholar
  6. Hood, Thomas. 1827. Whims and Oddities: In Prose and Verse, with Forty Original Designs, Second Series. London: Charles Tilt.Google Scholar
  7. Jupp, Peter C., and Clare Gittings, eds. 1999. Death in England: An Illustrated History. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kenneth Branagh (dir.). 1994. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, film, USA, Japan, UK: TriStar Pictures, Japan Satellite Broadcasting, IndieProd Company.Google Scholar
  9. Kitson, Peter. 2007. Romantic Literature, Race, and Colonial Encounter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liggins, Emma. 2000. The Medical Gaze and the Female Corpse: Looking at Bodies in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Studies in the Novel 32 (2): 129–146.Google Scholar
  11. Lyotard, Jean-François. 2004. Libidinal Economy. Trans. Iain Hamilton Grant. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. MacDonald, Helen. 2005. Human Remains: Dissection and Its Histories. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Malchow, H.L. 1996. Gothic Images of Race in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Marshall, Tim. 1995. Murdering to Dissect: Grave-Robbing, Frankenstein and the Anatomy Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, Wendy. 2005. The Knife Man: Blood, Body-Snatching and the Birth of Modern Surgery. London: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  16. Mulvey-Roberts, Marie. 2016. Dangerous Bodies: Historicising the Gothic Corporeal. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. ORLAN. 2010. Carnal Art Manifesto (1989). In ORLAN: A Hybrid Body of Art Works, ed. Simon Donger, Simon Shepherd, and ORLAN. Abingdon/Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Richardson, Ruth. 1988. Death, Dissection and the Destitute. London: Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ruston, Sharon. 2003. One of the ‘Modern Sceptics’: Reappraising Shelley’s Medical Education. Romanticism 9 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2005. Shelley and Vitality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sawday, Jonathan. 1995. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Shelley, Mary. 1994. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus, ed. Marilyn Butler. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Whale, James (dir.). 1931. Frankenstein, film, USA: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1935. Bride of Frankenstein, film, USA: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Mulvey-Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Arts and Cultural IndustriesUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations