Advertisement

Paracelsus and ‘P[r]etty Experimentalism’: The Glass Prison of Science and Secrecy in Frankenstein

  • Victor Sage
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Science Fiction book series (SGSF)

Abstract

Frankenstein’s obsession with scientific knowledge as ‘secret’ begins in a conversation between Mary Shelley’s parents about the necessity of openness in love. This exchange resulted in Godwin’s exploration of the glass prison of alchemy embodied in the narrator of his novel, St Leon (1799). The essay argues that the motif surfaces again in the bias of Victor’s own version of Paracelsus and the alchemists which influences his view of his tutors at Ingolstadt, opposing Waldman’s Neoplatonic ‘vision’ to Krempe’s Enlightenment empiricism, dismissed as ‘petty experimentalism’, which Frankenstein reads as a charter for his own secrecy. But Mary Shelley wrote ‘pretty experimentalism’ originally, which gives more value to ‘experiment’ and which the modern view of Paracelsus as primarily a bold experimenter seems to vindicate.

Works Cited

  1. Blake, William. 1961. Poetry and Prose of William Blake, ed. G. Keynes. London: Nonesuch Library.Google Scholar
  2. Bloch, Ernst. 1986. The Principle of Hope, 3 Vols. Trans. Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clemit, Patricia. 1993. The Godwinian Novel: The Rational Fictions of Godwin, Brocken Brown and Mary Shelley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Empson, William. 1994. The Spirits of “the Dream”. In Essays on Renaissance Literature, ed. John Haffenden, 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Godwin, William. 1994. St. Leon, ed. P. Clemit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Holmes, Richard. 2005. Shelley, the Pursuit. London: Harper.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2008. The Age of Wonder. London: Harper.Google Scholar
  8. Pagel, Walter. 1982. Paracelsus: An Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of the Renaissance. Paris: Karger.Google Scholar
  9. Plato. 1961. The Collected Dialogues, ed. E. Hamilton, and E. Cairns. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Shelley, Mary, with Shelley, Percy B. 1817. History of a Six Weeks’ Tour. London: T. Hookham Junr and Paula C and J. Ollier.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1987. The Journals of Mary Shelley, 1812–1844, ed. Paula R. Feldman, and Diana Scott Kilvert, 2 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1994. Frankenstein. In Four Gothic Novels. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2008. The Original Frankenstein, ed. Charles E. Robinson. Oxford: Bodleian Library.Google Scholar
  14. Voges, Michael. 1987. Aufklärung und Geheimnis. Tubingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wardle, Ralph M. 1967. Godwin and Mary: Letters of William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft. London: Constable.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Sage
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Literature, Drama and Creative Writing, Faculty of Arts and HumanitiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations