Advertisement

A Comparison of the Historical Entries in Wikipedia and Baidu Baike

  • Wenyi ShangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10766)

Abstract

This research chose two representative online encyclopedias, Wikipedia (English) and Baidu Baike, to compare their performance on historical entries. This research purposefully chose 6 entries and developed a framework to evaluate their performance in accuracy, breadth, depth, informativeness, conciseness and objectiveness. The result shows that: Wikipedia is superior in most cases while Baidu Baike is a little better in the entries on Chinese history. The operating mechanism is the main reason for it. The result implies that in the field of history, well-established online encyclopedias can be reliable for common users although improvement such as developing operating mechanisms is still needed.

Keywords

Wikipedia Baidu Baike Historical entries Entry quality 

References

  1. Blumenstock, J.E.: Size matters: word count as a measure of quality on Wikipedia. In: International Conference on World Wide Web, Peking, China (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Hu, M., Lim, E.P., Sun, A., Lauw, H.W., Vuong, B.Q.: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Lisbon, Portugal (2007)Google Scholar
  3. Jia, J., Li, Y.: Comparative analysis of the category organization systems of the Chinese Wikipedia and Baidu Baike. Inf. Stud.: Theory Appl. (6), 114–118 (2013). (Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Liao, H.: The cultural politics of user-generated encyclopedias: comparing Chinese Wikipedia and Baidu Baike. Unpublished doctor’s thesis. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Liao, H.: Harnessing the power of collaborative filtering. Comparing the network gatekeeping of Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia. China Perspectives, (4) (2015). http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/6854
  6. Rector, L.H.: Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles. Ref. Serv. Rev. 36(1), 7–22 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Spinellis, D., Louridas, P.: The collaborative organization of knowledge. Commun. ACM 51(8), 68–73 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang, F.: Enlightenments of synergic edition system on the networking of traditional encyclopedias. Sci. Technol. Publ. (11), 76–80 (2014). (Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Wang, K.: The Development and Application of Bilingual Corpus. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing (2004). (Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Wöhner, T., Peters, R.: Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles with lifecycle based metrics. In: International Symposium on Wikis, Orlando, Florida, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Yu, Y.: The Selected Readings and Translation of English and American Masterpieces. Xi’an Jiaotong University Press, Xi’an (1989). (Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ManagementPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations