Skip to main content

Analyzing Political Information Network of the U.S. Partisan Public on Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Transforming Digital Worlds (iConference 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10766))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The growing significance of social media among potential voters has been recognized by politicians because social media provides a direct method for political actors to connect with their citizens and organize them into online clusters through their use of hashtags. However, with few exclusions, most of the former studies stressed on the identification of personal tweets or cumulative properties of a mass of tweets and political fondness of discrete users, not on partisan public in the U.S. Thus, there is a lack of complete understanding about online social network of politically conflicting public and the public discourse in the network. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate how people adopt political information on Twitter via hashtag as a networked public and how people facilitate political communication among users with similar or disparate political orientations. This study confirmed the theory of homophily in adopting political hashtags on Twitter network. The referred media and highly mentioned domains for each network also support the concept of homophily. The manually examined users with top betweenness centralities were identified as opinion leaders and their tweeting patterns provide evidences that they play key roles in disseminating information through eWOM by occupying an important relational spot in the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, pp. 36–43. ACM, August 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, M.A., Groeling, T.: New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Polit. Commun. 25(4), 345–365 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bode, L., Hanna, A., Yang, J., Shah, D.V.: Candidate networks, citizen clusters, and political expression: strategic hashtag use in the 2010 midterms. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 659(1), 149–165 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A., Burgess, J.E.: New methodologies for researching news discussion on Twitter (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A., Highfield, T.: Political networks on Twitter: tweeting the Queensland state election. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16(5), 667–691 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M.R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 133, 89–96 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P.: The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Polit. Commun. 22(2), 147–162 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., Rojas, F.: More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. Plos One 8(11), e79449 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, H., Drezner, D.W.: The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice 134(1–2), 15 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1(3), 215–239 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, J., Shearer, E.: News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016, vol. 26. Pew Research Center (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., van’t Haar, G.: Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: the use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16(5), 692–716 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, J., Williams, C.B.: Communicating with constituents in 140 characters or less: Twitter and the diffusion of technology innovation in the United States Congress (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Commun. Theory 16(4), 411–426 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Polity, Cambridge (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D.L., Shneiderman, B., Smith, M.A.: Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, M.: The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P.F.: Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassen, D.S., Brown, A.R.: Twitter: the electoral connection? Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 29(4), 419–436 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makazhanov, A., Rafiei, D., Waqar, M.: Predicting political preference of Twitter users. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 4(1), 1–15 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27(1), 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W.R., Bimber, B., Hindman, M.: The Internet and four dimensions of citizenship. In: The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, pp. 22–42 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, E., Rousseau, R.: Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. J. Inf. Sci. 28(6), 441–453 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z.: Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z.: The virtual sphere: the internet as a public sphere. New Media Soc. 4(1), 9–27 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers Everett, M.: Diffusion of Innovations, vol. 12, New York (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S.P., Vatrapu, R.K., Medina, R.: Online video “friends” social networking: overlapping online public spheres in the 2008 US presidential election. J. Inf. Technol. Politics. 7(2–3), 182–201 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Eveland Jr., W.P., Kwak, N.: Information and expression in a digital age: modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Commun. Res. 32(5), 531–565 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M.: Homophily in myspace. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(2), 219–231 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremayne, M., Zheng, N., Lee, J.K., Jeong, J.: Issue publics on the web: applying network theory to the war blogosphere. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12(1), 290–310 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakita, K., Tsurumi, T.: Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1275–1276. ACM, May 2007

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank Dr. Tracy Everbach for assistance with her expertise and for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miyoung Chong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chong, M. (2018). Analyzing Political Information Network of the U.S. Partisan Public on Twitter. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds) Transforming Digital Worlds. iConference 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10766. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78104-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78105-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics