Abstract
The growing significance of social media among potential voters has been recognized by politicians because social media provides a direct method for political actors to connect with their citizens and organize them into online clusters through their use of hashtags. However, with few exclusions, most of the former studies stressed on the identification of personal tweets or cumulative properties of a mass of tweets and political fondness of discrete users, not on partisan public in the U.S. Thus, there is a lack of complete understanding about online social network of politically conflicting public and the public discourse in the network. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate how people adopt political information on Twitter via hashtag as a networked public and how people facilitate political communication among users with similar or disparate political orientations. This study confirmed the theory of homophily in adopting political hashtags on Twitter network. The referred media and highly mentioned domains for each network also support the concept of homophily. The manually examined users with top betweenness centralities were identified as opinion leaders and their tweeting patterns provide evidences that they play key roles in disseminating information through eWOM by occupying an important relational spot in the network.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, pp. 36–43. ACM, August 2005
Baum, M.A., Groeling, T.: New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Polit. Commun. 25(4), 345–365 (2008)
Bode, L., Hanna, A., Yang, J., Shah, D.V.: Candidate networks, citizen clusters, and political expression: strategic hashtag use in the 2010 midterms. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 659(1), 149–165 (2015)
Bruns, A., Burgess, J.E.: New methodologies for researching news discussion on Twitter (2011)
Bruns, A., Highfield, T.: Political networks on Twitter: tweeting the Queensland state election. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16(5), 667–691 (2013)
Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M.R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 133, 89–96 (2011)
Dahlgren, P.: The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Polit. Commun. 22(2), 147–162 (2005)
DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., Rojas, F.: More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. Plos One 8(11), e79449 (2013)
Farrell, H., Drezner, D.W.: The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice 134(1–2), 15 (2008)
Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1(3), 215–239 (1978)
Gottfried, J., Shearer, E.: News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016, vol. 26. Pew Research Center (2016)
Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., van’t Haar, G.: Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: the use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16(5), 692–716 (2013)
Gulati, J., Williams, C.B.: Communicating with constituents in 140 characters or less: Twitter and the diffusion of technology innovation in the United States Congress (2010)
Habermas, J.: Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Commun. Theory 16(4), 411–426 (2006)
Habermas, J.: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Polity, Cambridge (1962)
Hansen, D.L., Shneiderman, B., Smith, M.A.: Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston (2011)
Hindman, M.: The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)
Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P.F.: Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1955)
Lassen, D.S., Brown, A.R.: Twitter: the electoral connection? Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 29(4), 419–436 (2011)
Makazhanov, A., Rafiei, D., Waqar, M.: Predicting political preference of Twitter users. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 4(1), 1–15 (2014)
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27(1), 415–444 (2001)
Neuman, W.R., Bimber, B., Hindman, M.: The Internet and four dimensions of citizenship. In: The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, pp. 22–42 (2011)
Otte, E., Rousseau, R.: Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. J. Inf. Sci. 28(6), 441–453 (2002)
Papacharissi, Z.: Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
Papacharissi, Z.: The virtual sphere: the internet as a public sphere. New Media Soc. 4(1), 9–27 (2002)
Rogers Everett, M.: Diffusion of Innovations, vol. 12, New York (1962)
Robertson, S.P., Vatrapu, R.K., Medina, R.: Online video “friends” social networking: overlapping online public spheres in the 2008 US presidential election. J. Inf. Technol. Politics. 7(2–3), 182–201 (2010)
Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Eveland Jr., W.P., Kwak, N.: Information and expression in a digital age: modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Commun. Res. 32(5), 531–565 (2005)
Thelwall, M.: Homophily in myspace. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(2), 219–231 (2009)
Tremayne, M., Zheng, N., Lee, J.K., Jeong, J.: Issue publics on the web: applying network theory to the war blogosphere. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12(1), 290–310 (2006)
Wakita, K., Tsurumi, T.: Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1275–1276. ACM, May 2007
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank Dr. Tracy Everbach for assistance with her expertise and for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chong, M. (2018). Analyzing Political Information Network of the U.S. Partisan Public on Twitter. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds) Transforming Digital Worlds. iConference 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10766. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78104-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78105-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)