Advertisement

“What was this Movie About this Chick?”

A Comparative Study of Relevance Aspects in Book and Movie Discovery
  • Toine BogersEmail author
  • Maria Gäde
  • Marijn Koolen
  • Vivien Petras
  • Mette Skov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10766)

Abstract

In recent decades, information retrieval research has slowly expanded its focus to address the wealth of complex search requests present in our work and leisure environments. A better understanding of such complex needs could aid in the design of more effective, domain-specific search engines. In this paper we take a first step towards such domain-specific understanding. We present an analysis of a random sample of 1000+ complex book and movie search requests posted in the LibraryThing and Internet Movie Database forums. A coding scheme was developed that captures the 29 different relevance aspects expressed in these requests. We find that while the identified relevance aspects are remarkably similar for complex book and movie requests, their relative occurrence does vary considerably from domain to domain.

Keywords

Query analysis Book search Movie search Information need categorization Relevance aspects 

References

  1. 1.
    Austin, B.A.: Motion picture attendance and factors influencing movie selection among high school students. In: Proceedings of 33rd Annual University Film Association Conference (1979)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Austin, B.A.: Motivations for movie attendance. In: Proceedings of the 76th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, pp. 3–34 (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banerjee, S.C., Greene, K., Krcmar, M., Bagdasarov, Z., Ruginyte, D.: The role of gender and sensation seeking in film choice: exploring mood and arousal. Media Psychol. 20(3), 97–105 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belkin, N., Bogers, T., Kamps, J., Kelly, D., Koolen, M., Yilmaz, E.: Second workshop on supporting complex search tasks. In: CHIIR 2017, pp. 433–435 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bogers, T.: Searching for movies: an exploratory analysis of movie-related information needs. In: Proceedings of iConference 2015. iDEALS (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broder, A.: A taxonomy of web search. ACM SIGIR Forum 36(2), 3–10 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buchanan, G., McKay, D.: In the bookshop: examining popular search strategies. In: JCDL 2011, pp. 269–278 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elsweiler, D., Mandl, S., Kirkegaard Lunn, B.: Understanding casual-leisure information needs: a diary study in the context of television viewing. In: IIiX 2010, pp. 25–34 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76(5), 378–382 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inskip, C., Butterworth, R., MacFarlane, A.: A study of the information needs of the users of a folk music library and the implications for the design of a digital library system. IPM 44(2), 647–662 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jansen, B.J., Spink, A., Bateman, J., Saracevic, T.: Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the web. ACM SIGIR Forum 32(1), 5–17 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khabsa, M., Wu, Z., Giles, C.L.: Towards better understanding of academic search. In: JCDL 2016, pp. 111–114 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koolen, M., Bogers, T., van den Bosch, A., Kamps, J.: Looking for books in social media: an analysis of complex search requests. In: Hanbury, A., Kazai, G., Rauber, A., Fuhr, N. (eds.) ECIR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9022, pp. 184–196. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16354-3_19 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, J.H.: Analysis of user needs and information features in natural language queries seeking music information. JASIST 61(5), 1025–1045 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, X., Schijvenaars, B.J., de Rijke, M.: Investigating queries and search failures in academic search. IPM 53(3), 666–683 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McKenzie, P.J.: A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. J. Doc. 59(1), 19–40 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mikkonen, A., Vakkari, P.: Readers’ search strategies for accessing books in public libraries. In: IIIX 2012, pp. 214–223 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mikkonen, A., Vakkari, P.: Readers’ interest criteria in fiction book search in library catalogs. J. Doc. 72(4), 696–715 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pass, G., Chowdhury, A., Torgeson, C.: A picture of search. In: InfoScale 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pejtersen, A.M.: New model for multimedia interfaces to online public access catalogues. Electron. Libr. 10(6), 359–366 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reuter, K.: Assessing aesthetic relevance: children’s book selection in a digital library. JASIST 58(12), 1745–1763 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rose, D.E., Levinson, D.: Understanding user goals in web search. In: WWW 2004, pp. 13–19 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ross, C.S.: Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. IPM 35(6), 783–799 (1999)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(13), 1915–1933 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saricks, J.G.: Readers’ Advisory Service in the Public Library, 3rd edn. American Library Association, Chicago (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Savolainen, R.: Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of ‘way of life’. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 17, 259–294 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Serantes, L.C.: “I’m a marvel girl”: exploration of the selection practices of comic book readers. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Canadian Association of Information Science (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Waller, V.: Not just information: who searches for what on the search engine Google? JASIST 62(4), 761–775 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou, S., Cheng, K., Men, L.: The survey of large-scale query classification. In: AIP, vol. 1834, no. 1 (2017 )Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science, Policy and Information Studies, Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg University CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Berlin School of Library and Information ScienceHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Huygens INGRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and SciencesAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations