Advertisement

Co-design in a ‘Social’ Sharing Economy. Understanding Levels of Citizen Participation in Collaborative Services

  • Daniela Selloni
Chapter
Part of the Research for Development book series (REDE)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss a ‘minor’ characteristic of the sharing economy, focused on local exchange trading systems that arise from creative communities and local social innovations. This is the ‘social side’ of the sharing economy, quite different from the well-known digital platforms that are actually multinational companies allowing commercial exchanges amongst a variety of actors. As service designers researching in the field of social innovation, we are interested in exploring the sharing economy under this particular perspective; more specifically, we wish to centre on the contribution of the user (or, better, of the community of citizens–users) in developing this new generation of collaborative services. To do so, we build upon a series of Italian case studies coming from the ‘Creative Citizens’ programme held within the POLIMI DESIS Laboratory of the Politecnico di Milano. Finally, we discuss the interconnection between the various levels of citizen participation in such collaborative services, starting from co-design and then focusing on co-production, co-management and co-ownership. More specifically, highlighting how co-design may be a powerful means to pre-define roles and responsibilities, from both a practical and a formal point of view.

References

  1. Bannon, L. J., & Ehn, P. (2012). Design: Design matters in participatory design. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertsen (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 37–63). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.A. (2010). Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference.Google Scholar
  3. Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. Discussion paper by Nef, Nesta and The Lab, publications. Retrieved August 5, 2015, from http://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/312ac8ce93a00d5973_3im6i6t0e.pdf p. 11.
  4. Codagnone, C., Biagi, F., & Abadie, F. (2016). The passions and the interests: Unpacking the ‘sharing economy’. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC Science for Policy Report EUR 27914 EN, p. 22.Google Scholar
  5. Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  6. Jégou, F., & Manzini, E. (2008). Collaborative services. Social innovation and design for sustainability (p. 32). Milano: Edizioni Polidesign.Google Scholar
  7. Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Meroni, A. (Ed.) (2007). Creative communities. People inventing sustainable ways of living (p. 30). Milano: Edizioni Polidesign.Google Scholar
  9. Meroni, A., & Selloni, D. (2018). Design for social innovators. In S. Walker, M. Evans, T. Cassidy, J. Jung, & A. Twigger Holdroyd (Eds.), Design Roots: culturally significant designs, products and practices (pp. 305–318). London: Bloomsbury Academic. Ch. 22.Google Scholar
  10. Orsi, C. (2009). Knowledge-based society, peer production and the common good. Capital & Class, 33(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ostrom (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development (Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 1073–1087) Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd Great Britain, p. 1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pais, I., & Provasi, G. (2015). Sharing economy: A step toward the re-embeddedness of the economy? Stato e Mercato/ n. 105, dicembre 2015. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  13. Pestoff, V. (2012). Innovations in public services: Co-production and new public governance in Europe. In A. Botero, A.G. Paterson & J. Saad Sulonen (Eds.), Towards peer production in public services: Cases from Finland. Helsinki. Retrieved June 5, 2017, from http://books.aalto.fi.
  14. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Polanyi, K. (1957). The economy as instituted process. In K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, & H. W. Pearson (Eds.), Trade and market in the early empires: economies in history and theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sanders, E.B.N., & Stappers, P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanders, E.B.N., Brandt, E., & Binder, T. (2010). A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of PD. In Proceedings of PDC (pp. 195–198).Google Scholar
  19. Selloni, D. (2013). Service Makers. City dwellers and designers creating a local distribution system. In 10th European Academy of Design Conference. Crafting the Future. Göteborg: HDK, School of Design and Crafts.Google Scholar
  20. Selloni, D. (2017). CoDesign for public-interest services. Research for Development Series. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seravalli, A., Hillgren, P.A.,& Agger-Eriksen, M. (2015). Co-designing collaborative forms for urban commons: using the notions of commoning and agonism to navigate the practicalities and political aspects of collaboration. In 1st Thematic IASC Conference on Urban Commons, Bologna 7–9 Nov. 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento Di Design, Politecnico Di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations