Skip to main content

Levelized Function Cost: Economic Consideration for Design Concept Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Systematic Creativity

Abstract

Design concept selection lacks economic evaluation in the early stages of the design process. This chapter introduces the levelized function cost for express design evaluation, adapted from the power-generation sector. A single indicator represents all concept-related life-cycle costs per a unit of function produced, reflecting also the lifetime and productivity. The indicator allows comparing fundamentally different designs, and handles different sets of function objects. After a brief overview and comparison of potential indicators for economic assessment of design concepts, this chapter introduces the levelized function cost providing its derivation and definition, analyzes its sensitivity to the input variables, depicts the range of problems that can be addressed with the levelized function cost estimate, and finally illustrates its application in a flow meter design case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altshuller, G. S., & Shapiro, R. B. (1956). Psychology of inventive creativity. Issues of Psychology, 6, 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besharati, B., Azarm, S., & Kannan, P. K. (2006). A decision support system for product design selection: A generalized purchase modeling approach. Decision Support Systems, 42(1), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg New Energy Finance. (2015, October 12). The cost landscape of solar and wind. Available from http://www.senate.mn/committees/2015-2016/3058_Committee_on_Environment_and_Energy/2015-1_BNEF_presentation_final.pdf

  • Borenstein, S. (2011). The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branker, K., Pathak, M. J. M., & Pearce, J. M. (2011). A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4470–4482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, C., & Gerlach, A. (2013). Global overview on grid-parity. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 21(1), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., Aschenbrenner, P., Blunden, J., Smeloff, E., & Wright, S. (2008). The drivers of the levelized cost of electricity for utility-scale photovoltaics. In White Paper: SunPower Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chechurin, L., & Borgianni, Y. (2016). Understanding TRIZ through the review of top cited publications. Computers in Industry, 82, 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, A., Lovallo, D., & Mounarath, R. (2015). The effect of abductive reasoning on concept selection decisions. Design Studies, 37, 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. (1907). The rate of interest: Its nature, determination and relation to economic phenomena. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. K., & Petersen, S. R. (1995). Life-cycle costing manual for the federal energy management program. [cited December 3 2015]. Available from http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=907459

  • Gerasimov, V., Kalish, V., Kuzmin, A., & Litvin, S. S. (1991). Basics of function-cost analysis approach. Guidlines (in Russian). Moscow: Moscow, Inform-FSA: 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2–3) (5), 187–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Moro, J., & Martínez-Duart, J. M. (2013). Analytical model for solar PV and CSP electricity costs: Present LCOE values and their future evolution. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirtz, J. M., Stone, R. B., Szykman,S., McAdams, D. A., & Wood, K. L. (2001). Evolving a functional basis for engineering design. Paper presented at proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference: DETC2001, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W., Xiaowei, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33(2–3) (0), 30–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. W., & Smith, J. D. (1982). An historical perspective of net present value and equivalent annual cost. The Accounting Historians Journal, 9, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khastagir, A., & Jayasuriya, N. (2011). Investment evaluation of rainwater tanks. Water Resources Management, 25(14), 3769–3784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litvin, N. D., Gerasimov, V. M., Kalish, V. S., Karpunin, M. G., & Kuzmin, A. M. (1991). Basic methodology for functional-cost analysis. Moscow: InformFCA. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrab, E. B., Gupta, S. K., Patrick McCluskey, F., & Sandborn, P. (2009). Integrated product and process design and development: The product realization process. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malen, D. E. (1996). Decision making in preliminary product design: Combining economic and quality considerations. The Engineering Economist, 41(2), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1894). Capital: A critique of political economy, vol. III. the process of capitalist production as a whole [Das Kapital, Kritik der politischen Ökonomie] (trans: Untermann, E., ed. F. Engels). Chicago: Charles H. Kerr and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, L. D., & Boehm, H. H. (1967). Value engineering. Landsberg: Verlag Moderne Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moehrle, M. G. (2005). How combinations of TRIZ tools are used in companies–results of a cluster analysis. R&D Management, 35(3), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikander, J. B., Liikkanen, L. A., & Laakso, M. (2014). The preference effect in design concept evaluation. Design Studies, 35(5), 473–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, K. L., Ogden, G. E., Hanners, J. L., & Unkefer, P. J. (1996). Remediation of low-level mixed waste: Cellulose-based materials and plutonium. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 51(1), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okudan, G. E., & Tauhid, S. (2008). Concept selection methods-a literature review from 1980 to 2008. International Journal of Design Engineering, 1(3), 243–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, X., & Lin, B. (2014). Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of renewable energies and required subsidies in China. Energy Policy, 70, 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., & Park, G. (2004). A new method for technology valuation in monetary value: Procedure and application. Technovation, 24(5), 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, S., & Clausing, D. (1996). Creating innovative products using total design: The living legacy of Stuart Pugh. London: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelstein, S., & Rohlfing, A. (2014). Levelized product cost: Concept and decision relevance. The Accounting Review 90(4), 1653–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, P. A., & Ryan, G. P. (2002). Capital budgeting practices of the fortune 1000: How have things changed. Journal of Business and Management, 8(4), 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAVE International. (2015, December 3). Value methodology standard. Available from http://www.value-eng.org/pdf_docs/monographs/vmstd.pdf

  • Short, W., Packey, D. J., & Holt, T. (2005). A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, N. P. (1990). The principles of design. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toh, C. A., & Miller, S. R. (2015). How engineering teams select design concepts: A view through the lens of creativity. Design Studies, 38, 111–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Energy Information Administration. (2015, October 12). Levelized cost and levelized avoided cost of new generation resources in the annual energy outlook 2015. Available from http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf

  • Wallace, K., & Burgess, S. (1995). Methods and tools for decision making in engineering design. Design Studies, 16(4) (10), 429–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Energy Council. (2013). World energy perspective. cost of energy technologies. [cited October 12 2015]. Available from https://www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WEC_J1143_CostofTECHNOLOGIES_021013_WEB_Final.pdf

  • Younker, D. (2003). Value engineering: Analysis and methodology (Vol. 30). New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support by Fortum Foundation (grant No. 201700063), the Finnish Strategic Research Council project “Manufacturing 4.0” (grant No. 313396), and TEKES, the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation, and its program FiDiPro. We would also like to acknowledge the input of Prof. Mikael Collan from LUT School of Business and Management. He provoked and inspired the authors to bridge design and evaluation methods.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariia Kozlova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kozlova, M., Chechurin, L., Efimov-Soini, N. (2019). Levelized Function Cost: Economic Consideration for Design Concept Evaluation. In: Chechurin, L., Collan, M. (eds) Advances in Systematic Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics