Skip to main content

The Presence of Hegelian Elements in the Thought of Josiah Strong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hegel in the Arab World
  • 361 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the views of Josiah Strong and the link with Hegel’s thought. Strong was a prominent figure among Protestant missionaries in the United States, an important example of a politically active American missionary, influential on foreign policy, and a prominent thinker about philosophy of history. His connection to Hegel’s thought is evident when considering his general position, as well as his explicit references to Hegel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We have already seen Macbride Sterrett. One prominent example of Hegelian influence is the School of Saint-Louis. On the reception of Hegel’s thought in America see, among others: Cook and Leavelle (1943), Muirhead (1928), Goetzmann (1973), Pochman (1970), Muelder and Sears (1940). See also Rogers (2005).

  2. 2.

    He played a leading role in applying intense pressure on American foreign policy towards Turkey. On this topic see Reed (1972), who mainly deals with Strong’s activity in relation to the Armenian question.

  3. 3.

    Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of History (Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte) were translated into English in 1861 by John Sibree, from the second edition of Hegel’s Werke, edited by Eduard Gans and Karl Hegel (1840). As noted earlier, Hegel’s published lectures were not written directly by Hegel: the text has been built by the editors from listeners’ transcripts. Knowledge of German thought was also spread through compendia of the main authors, such as Morris’s “Griggs’ Philosophical Classics,” a series which is focused on German thought (“Devoted to a Critical Exposition of the Masterpieces of German Thought”). In this series, as well as the compendium Hegel’s Philosophy of the State and History by Morris (1887), from which Strong’s quotations are taken, Hegel’s Logic by W.T. Harris (1890) was published. On G.S. Morris see Wenley (1917).

  4. 4.

    It can be noted, however, that these two elements are very similar to what Hegel sees as “individuality” and “substance,” and that Guizot also highlights the importance for civilization of the development of both the individual and society (see Guizot [1828] 1899, p. 9 ff.).

  5. 5.

    Strong here is quoting from Morris (1887, p. 181).

  6. 6.

    Strong here is quoting from Morris (1887, p. 227).

  7. 7.

    Strong cites Spencer’s assertion on the excellence, from a biological point of view, of a type of man made up of the best parts of the Aryan race, being more plastic and adaptable (Strong 1893, p. 172).

  8. 8.

    In some cases, these authors explicitly refer to Hegel’s thinking, as in the Preface in The Nation by E. Mulford (1887). On the influence of Hegel on Mulford and the latter on the Protestant Progressive thought, see Brown (1984).

  9. 9.

    See Strong, who holds that English language “is the great agent of Christian civilization throughout the world” (Strong 1885, p. 178). He also cites German philologist Jacob Grimm about his statement of the excellence of the German language (p. 179).

References

  • Brown, Colin. 1984. “Elisha Mulford (1833–1885) and His Influence: A ‘Fame Not Equal to His Deserts’.” The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography CVIII (1): 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Thomas I., and Arnaud B. Leavelle. 1943. “German Idealism and American Theories of the Democratic Community.” The Journal of Politics V (3): 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, William H., ed. 1973. The American Hegelians: An Intellectual Episode in the History of Western America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guizot, François. [1828] 1899. History of Civilization in Europe. Translated by William Hazlitt. New York: The Colonial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, William Torrey. 1890. Hegel’s Logic. Chicago: S.C. Griggs and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1840. “Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte.” In Werke. Vollständige Ausgabe durch einen Verein von Freunden des Verewigten, [1832–1845], hrsg. von Eduard Gans und Karl Hegel, 2nd ed. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1840] (1861) 2001. The Philosophy of History. Translated by John Sibree, Preface by Charles Hegel. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magoon, Elias Lyman. 1856. Westward Empire: Or, the Great Drama of Human Progress. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, George S. 1887. Hegel’s Philosophy of the State and of History. Chicago: S.C. Griggs and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muelder, Walter, and Laurence Sears, eds. 1940. “Idealism from William T. Harris to James E. Creighton.” In The Development of American Philosophy, edited by Walter G. Muelder and Laurence Sears. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead, John Henry. 1928. “How Hegel Came to America.” The Philosophical Review XXXVII (3): 226–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, Elisha. 1887. The Nation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pochman, Henry. 1970. New England Transcendentalism and St. Louis Hegelianism: Phases in the History of American Idealism. New York: Haskell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, James Eldin. 1972. “American Foreign Policy, the Politics of Missions and Josiah Strong, 1890–1900.” Church History XLI (2): 230–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Dorothy G. 2005. America’s First Women Philosophers. Transplanting Hegel, 1860–1925. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaff, Philip. 1846. Anglo-Germanism or the Significance of the German Nationality in the United States. An Address Delivered March 10, 1846 Before the Schiller Society of Marshall College. Chambersburg, PA: Publication Office of the German Reformed Church.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1856. American Nationality. Chambersburg, PA: Kieffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, John E. 1963. “Protestant Clergymen and American Destiny: II. Prelude to Imperialism, 1865–1900.” The Harvard Theological Review LVI (4): 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, Josiah. 1885. Our Country: Its Possible Future and Its Present Crisis. New York: The American Home Missionary Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1893. The New Era, or the Coming Kingdom. New York: Baker and Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenley, Robert. 1917. The Life and Work of George Sylvester Morris. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorella Ventura .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ventura, L. (2018). The Presence of Hegelian Elements in the Thought of Josiah Strong. In: Hegel in the Arab World. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78066-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics