This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
On which see Hunter Heyck (2015).
- 2.
As much as IR might be an American social science, a growing body of literature has examined the history of IR in specific country settings and revealed the sharp differences that exist between the United States and the rest of the world. See, for example, Jorgensen and Knudsen (2006), and Tickner and Weaver (2009).
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Felix Rösch (2014: 1).
- 6.
See for instance David Bates (2011).
- 7.
There are, of course, exceptions as IR scholars increasingly cross-over to a mode of investigation no longer limited by the boundaries of their discipline.
- 8.
For a more detailed discussion of the overlap between realism and the historical turn, see Nicolas Guilhot (2014).
References
Armitage, D. (2013). Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, D. (2011). States of War: Enlightenment Origins of the Political. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bell, D. (Ed.). (2007). Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bessner, D. (2018). Democracy in Exile: Hans Speier and the Rise of the Defense Intellectual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cox, M. (Ed.). (2000). E.H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dunne, T. (1998). Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London: Macmillan.
Eckbladh, D. (2011). Present at the Creation: Edward Mead Earle and the Depression-Era Origins of Security Studies. International Security, 36(3), 107–141.
Greenberg, U. (2014). The Weimar Century: German Émigrés and the Ideological Foundations of the Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Guilhot, N. (2014). Portrait of the Realist as a Historian: On Anti-Whiggism in the History of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 21(1), 3–26.
Guilhot, N. (2017a). After the Enlightenment: Political Realism and International Relations in the Mid-20th Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guilhot, N. (2017b). “The French Connection”: Aron, Duroselle Et Le Ceri: Eléments Pour Une Histoire Des Relations Internationales En France. Revue Française de Science Politique, 67(1), 43–67.
Heyck, H. (2015). Age of System: Understanding the Development of Modern Social Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, S. (1977). An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus, 106, 41–59.
Jones, C. (1998). E.H. Carr and International Relations: A Duty to Lie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jorgensen, K. E., & Knudsen, T. B. (Eds.). (2006). International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations. London: Routledge.
Jütersonke, O. (2010). Morgenthau, Law and Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2002). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, D., & Schmidt, B. C. (Eds.). (2005). Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Mazower, M. (2012). Governing the World: The History of an Idea. London: Penguin.
Quirk, J., & Vigneswaran, D. (Eds.). (2005). The Construction of an Edifice: The Story of a First Great Debate. Review of International Studies, 31(1), 89–107.
Rajaee, F. (2013). Kenneth W. Thompson, the Prophet of Norms. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rengger, N. (2013). On Theology and International Relations: World Politics Beyond the Empty Sky. International Relations, 27(2), 141–157.
Rietzler, K. (2008). Philanthropy, Peace Research and Revisionist Politics: Rockefeller and Carnegie Support for the Study of International Relations in Weimar Germany. German Historical Society Bulletin Supplement, 5, 61–79.
Rösch, F. (2014). Émigré Scholars and the Genesis of International Relations. A European Discipline in America? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosenboim, O. (2017). The Emergence of Globalism: Visions of World Order in Britain and the United States, 1939–1950. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Scheuerman, W. (2009). Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity.
Scheuerman, W. (2011). The Realist Case for Global Reform. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schmidt, B. C. (1998). The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Schmidt, B. C. (2012). International Relations and the First Great Debate. London: Routledge.
Schorske, C. E. (1987). A Life of Learning (Charles Homer Haskins Lecture). Washington, DC: American Council of Learned Societies.
Sylvest, C. (2008). John H. Herz and the Resurrection of Classical Realism. International Relations, 22(4), 441–455.
Teschke, B. (2009). The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso.
Thakur, V., Davis, A. E., & Vale, P. (2017). Imperial Mission, ‘Scientific’ Method: An Alternative Account of the Origins of IR. Millennium, 46(1), 3–23.
Thies, C. (2012). Myth, Half-Truth, Reality or Strategy?: Managing Disciplinary Identity and the Origins of the First Great Debate. In B. C. Schmidt (Ed.), International Relations and the First Great Debate (pp. 118–132). New York: Routledge.
Tickner, A. B., & Weaver, O. (2009). International Relations Scholarship Around the World. London: Routledge.
Tjalve, V. S. (2008). Realist Strategies of Republican Peace: Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and the Politics of Patriotic Dissent (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tuck, R. (1999). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vitalis, R. (2015). White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Williams, M. C. (Ed.). (2007). Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, M. C. (2013). In the Beginning: The International Relations Enlightenment and the Ends of International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 647–665.
Wilson, P. (1998). The Myth of the First Great Debate. Review of International Studies, 24(Special Issue), 1–16.
Zajec, O. (2016). Spykman: L’invention De La Géopolitique Américaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guilhot, N. (2019). Introduction. In: Schmidt, B., Guilhot, N. (eds) Historiographical Investigations in International Relations. The Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78036-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78036-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78035-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78036-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)