Skip to main content

To Feel Secure or to Be Secure, That Is the Question

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The title of this volume is “Security by design”. This can be read as a statement, as an expression of confidence that it is possible to be secure by design. In that case the obvious next step is to think about possible ways of ensuring security by design, starting, for instance, with the solutions that have been developed to solve the seemingly analogous problems of safety or prevention by design. But what if the title had been “Security by design?” or in other words a question rather than a statement? In that case the title would not be taken as an expression of confidence but rather as an admission of uncertainty or even of impotence, a possible doubt of whether security can be ensured by design. The obvious next step would then be to take a closer look at the two central concepts, namely “security” and “design”. The current chapter will do just that.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rittel HWJ (1988) The reasoning of designers. (Arbeitspapier zum international congress on planning and design theory, Boston, August 1987.) Universität Stuttgart: Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Grundlagen der Planung

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. von Foerster H (2002) Understanding systems: conversations on epistemology and ethics (IFSR International series in systems science and systems engineering, vol 17.) Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lovins AB, Lovins LH (1982) Brittle power. Brick House Publishing Co, Andover, MA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zwetsloot GIJM et al (2013) The case for research into the zero accident vision. Saf Sci 58:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollnagel E (2014) Safety-I and Safety-II: the past and future of safety management. Ashgate, Farnham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burati DL, Godoy SG (1982) Sneak analysis application guidelines. RADC-TR-82-179. Rome Air Development Center

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hahn AH (1991) Applying sneak analysis to the identification of human errors of commission. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 33:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiener N (1964) God & Golem, Inc. A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morozov E (2013) The perils of perfection. The New York Times, 2 March 2013

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Methuen & Co, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Conant RC, Ashby WR (1970) Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. Int J Syst Sci 1(2):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Westrum R (1993) Cultures with requisite imagination. In: Wise JA, Hopkin VD, Stager P (eds) Verification ad validation of complex systems: human factors issues. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 401–416

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Adamski AJ, Westrum R (2003) Requisite imagination. The fine art of anticipating what might go wrong. In: E Hollnagel (ed), Handbook of cognitive task design. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  15. Westrum R (2006) A typology of Resilience Situations. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds), Resilience engineering. concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK

    Google Scholar 

  16. Green AE (1988) Human factors in industrial risk assessment—some early work. In: Goodstein LP, Andersen HB, Olsen SE (eds) Task, errors and mental models. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hollnagel E (1995) Latent failure conditions and safety barrier integrity. Invited presentation at Joint OECD/NEA-IAEA symposium on human factors and organisation in NPP maintenance outages: impact on safety. Stockholm, Sweden, 19–22 June

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hollnagel E (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hollnagel E (2017) Safety-II in practice: developing the resilience potentials. Routledge, Abingdon, UK

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weick KE (1987) Organizational culture as a source of high reliability. Calif Manag Rev 29(2):112–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Hollnagel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hollnagel, E. (2018). To Feel Secure or to Be Secure, That Is the Question. In: Masys, A. (eds) Security by Design. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78021-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78021-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78020-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78021-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics