The Belt and Road Initiative as Global Public Good: Implications for International Law



Among various perspectives to view the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI), the Global Public Good (GPG) theory provides a distinct angle to assess the coming opportunities and challenges, with the resolution of “collective action” dilemma as its primary concern. To tackle the collective action problem and ensure the provision of necessary GPGs, international law should be the suitable facilitator to coordinate and compromise divergent interests along the Belt and Road. However, the GPG narrative of the BRI entails a more holistic and grandeur vision for a world order which surpassed the parochial and constrained foundation in which international law was originated. Based on the Chinese conception of world order which is ingrained in the old philosophical concept “Tian-xia” (All-Under-Heaven), the chapter critically examines the role of international law in the course of international cooperation and proposes a new perspective to revive the public facet of international law to genuinely meet the GPGs expectation of the BRI. In the meantime, to avoid being purely speculative, the chapter heightens the practical opportunities and challenges the GPG narrative of the BRI brings to an emerging Chinese perspective of international law.


  1. Anghie, A. (2007). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, S. (2007). Why cooperate?: The incentive to supply global public goods. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodansky, D. (2012). What’s in a concept? Global public goods, international law, and legitimacy. European Journal of International Law, 23, 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, T. (1984). The People’s Republic of China and public international law. Dalhousie Law Journal, 8, 3.Google Scholar
  5. Coussy, J. (2005). The adventures of a concept: Is neo-classical theory suitable for defining global public goods? Review of International Political Economy, 12, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eichengreen, B. (1989). Hegemonic stability theories of the international monetary system (NBER Working Paper No. 2193). In R. Bryant (Ed.), Can nations agree? Essays on international economic cooperation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  7. Eriksen, S. S., & Sending, O. J. (2013). There is no global public: The idea of the public and the legitimation of governance. International Theory, 5, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gavas, M. (2013). The EU and global public goods, challenges and opportunities (DIIS Report 5). Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, A. (1985). The nation-state and violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gravelle, H., & Rees, R. (1992). Microeconomics. Harlow: Longman Group UK Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Greene, J. P. (1990). Peripheries and center: Constitutional development in the extended polities of the British Empire and the United States 1607–1788. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  12. Kaul, I. (2011). Rethinking public goods and global public goods. In B. Siebenhüne, E. Brousseau, & T. Dedeurwaerdere (Eds.), Reflexive governance for global public goods. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kaul, I. (2012). Global public goods: Explaining their under provision. Journal of International Economic Law, 15, 729–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaul, I. (2013). Global public goods, A concept for framing the post-2015 Agenda. Discussion Paper for German Development Institute (D.I.E) 2.Google Scholar
  15. Kaul, I., & Conceição, P. (Eds.). (2006). The new public finance: Responding to global challenges. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kaul, I., Conceição, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.). (2003). Providing global public goods: Managing globalization. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. (Eds.). (1999). Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, D. (1987). International legal structures. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  19. Kennedy, D. (2016). A world of struggle: How power, law, and expertise shape global political economy. Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kindleberger, C. P. (1986). International public goods without international government. The American Economic Review, 76, 1–13.Google Scholar
  21. Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From apology to Utopia: The structure of international legal argument. Reissue with a new epilogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Koskenniemi, M. (2011). Histories of international law: Dealing with Eurocentrism. Rechtsgeschichte, 19, 152–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krisch, N. (2014). The decay of consent: International law in an age of global public goods. American Journal of International Law, 108, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, Z. (2014). Following the five principles of peaceful coexistence and jointly building a community of common destiney. Speech made at the international colloquium commemorating the 60th anniversary of the five principles of peaceful coexistence in Beijing on 27 May 2014. Chinese Journal of International Law, 13, 477–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Long, D., & Woolley, F. (2009). Global public goods: Critique of a UN discourse, global governance. A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 15, 107–122.Google Scholar
  26. Mendoza, R. U. (2003). The multilateral trade regime: A global public good for all? In P. Conceição, I. Kaul, K. Le Goulven, & R. U. Mendoza (Eds.), Providing global public goods: Managing globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Neely, C. J. (2015). Unconventional monetary policy had large international effects. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nordhaus, W. N. (2005). Paul Samuelson and global public goods: A commemorative essay for Paul Samuelson (p. 8). Retrieved October 18, 2017, from
  29. Olson, M. (1971). Increasing the incentives for international cooperation. International Organization, 25, 866–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orford, A. (2003). Reading humanitarian intervention: Human rights and the use of force in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oslon, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Petersmann, E. (2012). Introduction and overview: A research Agenda for making “global public goods theory more policy relevant” in “mini-symposium on multilevel governance of interdependent public goods”. Journal of International Economic Law, 15, 710.Google Scholar
  33. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  34. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sato, S. (2014). The intellectuals and civilization in modern Chinese history (in Chinese). Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schmitt, C. (1996). The concept of the political (G. Schwab, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shaffer, G. (2012). International law and global public goods in a legal pluralist world. European Journal of International Law, 23, 669–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shichor, Y. (2006). China’s voting behavior in the UN security council. China Brief, 6, 4–6.Google Scholar
  39. Tavlas, G. S. (1997). The international use of the US dollar: An optimum currency area perspective. The World Economy, 20, 709–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Varian, H. R. (1978). Microeconomic analysis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, T. (1990). International law in China: Historical and contemporary perspectives. In Recueil Des Cours. Netherlands: Hague Academy of International Law.Google Scholar
  42. Xi Jingping. (2017). Building a community of common destiny for all Mankind. Speech delivered in the UN Headquarters Geneva.Google Scholar
  43. Yi, P. (2016). Swan song, or a phoenix rising. Journal of the History of International Law, 18, 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, J. (2017). China’s aid to Africa. In H. Zhou & H. Xiong (Eds.), China’s foreign aid: 60 year in retrospect. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Zhao, T. (2006). Rethinking empire from a Chinese concept ‘all-under-heaven’ (Tian-xia). Social Identities, 12, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao, T. (2009). A political world philosophy in terms of all-under-heaven (Tian-xia). Diogenes, 56, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhao, T. (2016). A possible world of all-under-heaven system: The world in the past and for the future. (In Chinese). Beijing: Citics Publishing House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Peking University Law SchoolBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations