Advertisement

Developing a Sustainable Legal System for the Belt and Road Initiative

Chapter

Abstract

Effective implementation and enforcement of laws and regulations will to a large extent determine how successful the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) turns out to be. Mutual respect and trust between trading partners is crucial. This chapter explores how the various legal and regulatory systems can be developed to encourage and enhance trustworthy behavior. The countries involved in Belt and Road (BR) are very varied in their legal and regulatory approaches, ranging from those which rely heavily on religious teachings to those with common law or civil law traditions. Each type of law takes a different approach to matters which are relevant to trustworthiness. Achieving a sustainable legal and regulatory framework for BR requires, as a matter of urgency, that attention is given to how the various legal systems interact. BR follows a long tradition whereby the Silk Road facilitated interchange between the great civilisations of China, Mesopotamia, Persia, India and Rome, and later Europe. Achieving this will require that trust between nations is established, not only at the highest levels of government, but also between individuals, companies and communities. Lack of trustworthy behaviour can adversely affect relations between governments (for example, between Greece and Europe), between companies (leading to numerous defaults and corporate failures, including those which accompanied the Global Financial Crisis (GFC)) and between individuals. In what follows, we explore the various methods whereby shared values (or at least a set of shared beliefs) can be developed, in order to ensure that the behaviour of those in authority is trustworthy. This varies from country to country, from sector to sector, and under different legal traditions. In doing this we draw on work carried out at Oxford and elsewhere on how trustworthy behaviour can be encouraged. We argue that it is the role of the Law, including in bilateral and multilateral trading arrangements, to ensure that relationships between market players and stakeholders are as fair and transparent as possible, through mechanisms that influence norms and hold those who behave in untrustworthy ways to account. Chinese law and practice is contrasted with those in other jurisdiction in order to explore the relative merits of each. Sustainability of the BR legal system requires consensus and long-term sustainable relationships.

Keywords

Road Initiative Sustainable Legacy Trustworthy Behavior Untrustworthy Ways Multilateral Trade Arrangements 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Deborah Healey, Jeanne Huang, Yongqiang Li, Colin Picker and Rob Nicholls for helpful guidance and comments on previous versions of this chapter. Any errors or misunderstandings are entirely my own.

References

  1. Allen, F., Chakrabarti, R., De, S., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2010). Law, institutions and finance in China and India. In B. Eichengreen, P. Gupta, & R. Kumar (Eds.), Emerging giants: China and India in the world economy (Chapter 5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arghyrou, M. G., & Tsoukalas, J. D. (2010). The Greek Debt crisis: Likely causes, mechanics and outcomes (Cardiff Economics Working Papers, E2010/3).Google Scholar
  3. Armour, J. (2008). Enforcement strategies in UK corporate governance: A roadmap and empirical assessment (ECGI Working Paper No. 106/2008).Google Scholar
  4. Aronson, B. E. (2012). The Olympus scandal and corporate governance reform: Can Japan find a middle ground between the board monitoring model and management model? UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 30(1), 93–148.Google Scholar
  5. Arrow, K. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 343–362.Google Scholar
  6. Arsht, S. S. (1979). The business judgment rule revisited. Hofstra Law Review, 8(1), 93–134.Google Scholar
  7. Bahar, R., & Thévenoz, L. (2007). Conflicts of interest: Disclosure, incentives, and the market. In L. Thévenoz & R. Bahar (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Corporate governance and financial markets. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  8. Bai, X. Z., & Morris, N. (2014a). Leadership and virtue ethics: A Daoist approach. Public Integrity, 16(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bai, X. Z., & Morris, N. (2014b). The significance of the ethical framework of Taoism and Confucianism in the Chinese politics and society. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Humanities and Social Sciences Conference (APHSS 2014), Shanghai, November 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Bai, X. Z., & Morris, N. (2015). China, economic Taoism and development: Different paradigms, different outcomes? In C. Picker, L. Toohey, & J. Greenacre (Eds.), China in the new international economic order: New directions and changing paradigms (Chapter 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Barnes, W. R. (2005). Contemplating a civil law paradigm for a future international commercial code. Louisiana Law Review, 65, 677.Google Scholar
  12. Barry, K. (2009). Healthsouth’s corporate accounting scandal: A case study in fraudulent financial reporting. Management 226: Special Topics in Advanced Accounting. UCLA Anderson School of Management.Google Scholar
  13. Beijing Review. (2015, May 15). Beijing Review, 15. Beijing Review com.cn.Google Scholar
  14. Bingham, T. (2007). The rule of law. Cambridge Law Journal, 66(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byford, S. (2015, July 21). The Verge. www.theverge.com.
  16. Chung, W. K., & Hamilton, G. (2001). Social logic as business logic: Guanxi, trustworthiness and the embeddedness of Chinese business practices. In R. P. Appelbaum, W. L. F. Felstiner, & V. Gessner (Eds.), Rules and networks: The legal culture of global business transactions (pp. 302–349). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  17. Clemens, M. (2015). The Maritime Silk Road and the PLA: Part One. ChinaBrief, XV(6).Google Scholar
  18. Desai, S. A., & Mulla, D. F. (2007). Principles of Hindu law. New Delhi: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  19. Diamant, N. J., Lubman, S. B., & O’Brien, K. J. (2005). Engaging the law in China: State, society, and possibilities for justice. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dolan, P., & White, M. (2006). Dynamic well-being: Connecting indicators of what people anticipate with indicators of what they experience. Social Indicators Research, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Epstein, W. N. (2014). Facilitating incomplete contracts. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 65(2), 297–340.Google Scholar
  22. European Parliament. (2016, July). One Belt, One Road (OBOR): China’s regional integration initiative. Briefing.Google Scholar
  23. Fei, X., Hamilton, G. G., & Wang, Z. (1992). From the soil, the foundations of Chinese society: A translation of Fei Xiaotong’s Xiangtu Zhongguo, with an introduction and epilogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Frankel, T. (1993). Fiduciary law: The judicial process and the duty of care. Paper presented at the 1993 Isaac Pitblado Lectures, University of Manitoba Law School.Google Scholar
  25. Fu, S. Z. (2013). On the application of virtues, competence, hardwork, achievement and cleanness in the performance evaluation of government and party officials. Journal of Hunan Communication Science and Technology, 39(1), 98–101.Google Scholar
  26. Fukayama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Getzler, J. (2014). Financial crisis and the decline of fiduciary law. In N. Morris & D. Vines (Eds.), Capital failure: Rebuilding trust in financial services (Chapter 9, pp. 193–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gleeson, M. (2008, January 4). The role of a judge in a representative democracy. Speech to the Judiciary of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.Google Scholar
  29. Glendon, M. A., Carozza, P., & Picker, C. (2008). Comparative legal traditions in a nutshell. St Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Glenn, P. (2010). Legal traditions of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gold, N. (2014). Trustworthiness and motivations. In N. Morris & D. Vines (Eds.), Capital failure: Rebuilding trust in financial services (Chapter 6, pp. 129–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldsworthy, J. (1997). Originalism in constitutional interpretation. Federal Law Review, 25(1).Google Scholar
  33. Green, D. (2001). Regional co-operation policies in Central Asia. Journal of International Development, 13, 1151–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamilton, S., & Micklethwait, A. (2006). Greed and corporate failure: The lessons from recent disasters. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Healey, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2003). The fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hellström, J., & Korkmaz, K. (2011). Managing mutual mistrust: Understanding Chinese perspectives on Sino-Indian relations. Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency.Google Scholar
  37. Hu, J. T. (2006). To set up construct socialist concepts on honors and disgraces (in Chinese). Beijing: The Peoples Press. Available at: http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/1024/4336318.html.
  38. Hunter-Schultz, T. (2005). Rule of law, separation of powers and judicial decision making in Australia. The National Legal Eagle, 11(1), Article 5.Google Scholar
  39. Jickling, M., & Janov, P. H. (2003). Criminal charges in corporate scandals. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  40. Kenny, S. (2015). China and India: A New Great Game founded on historic mistrust and current competition. Canberra: Centre for Defence and Strategic Studies, Australian Defence College.Google Scholar
  41. Kuran, T. (2011). West is best? Why civilizations rise and fall. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 159.Google Scholar
  42. Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Wu, L. (2011). The effect of Guanxi on audit quality in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C., & Kali, R. (1999). Guanxi versus the market: Ethics and efficiency. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. (2012). Guanxi and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 139–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moberg, D., & Romar, E. (2009). WorldCom case study. Santa Clara, CA: Santa Clara University.Google Scholar
  46. Morris, N., & Vines, D. (2014). Capital failure: Rebuilding trust in financial services. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. NDRC. (2015). Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. Issued by the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce of the Peoples Republic of China, with State Council authorization.Google Scholar
  48. Nelson, R. R. (2005). The limits of market organisation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  49. O’Rourke, J. A. (2009). Collection scandal at Sears Roebuck & Company. Eugene D. Fanning Center For Business Communication 00-05, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  50. Offer, A. (2014). Regard for others. In N. Morris & D. Vines (Eds.), Capital failure: Rebuilding trust in financial services (Chapter 7, pp. 154–171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Picker, C. B. (2008). International laws mixed heritage: A common/civil law jurisdiction. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 41, 1083.Google Scholar
  52. Picker, C. B. (2011). China, global governance and legal culture. In J. Nakagaw (Ed.), China and global economic governance: Ideas and concepts (p. 77). ISS Research Series No. 45. Tokyo: Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
  53. Raballand, G., & Andrésy, A. (2007). Why should trade between Central Asia and China continue to expand? Asian Europe Journal, 5(2), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosen, R. (2003). Risk management and corporate governance: The case of Enron. Connecticut Law Review, 35, 1157–1184.Google Scholar
  55. Schwartz, S. (2009). Islam and Communism. Washington, DC: Centre for Islamic Pluralism.Google Scholar
  56. Shi, W., & Cui, X. L. (2004). On evaluation of civil servants and the criteria of morality, competence, hardworking, and performance (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  57. Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments (Ed. D. D. Raphael, A. L. Macfie). Vol. I of the Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith. Originally published 1759. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. First published 1776. Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, N. C., & Quirk, M. (2004). From grace to disgrace: The rise & fall of Arthur Anderson. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 91–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, V. L. (1998, July). The two faces of Adam Smith. Southern Economic Journal, 65(1), 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Song, L. P., Ling, W. Q., & Fang, L. L. (2009). On the cultural roots of moral leadership in China (in Chinese). Theoretical Field, 5, 166–169.Google Scholar
  62. Turcotte, K. (2005). Why legal flexibility is not a threat to either the common law system of England and Australia or the civil law system of France in the twenty-first century. Hanse Law Review, 1(2), 190–197.Google Scholar
  63. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2009). Investment guide to the Silk Road. Google Scholar
  64. Vines, D. (2015). On concerted unilateralism: Raising the global growth rate through macroeconomic policy coordination. In T. Bayoumi, S. Pickford, & P. Subacchi (Eds.), Managing complexity: Economic policy cooperation after the crisis. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wang, J., Wang, G. G., Ruona, W. E. A., & Rojewski, J. W. (2005). Confucian values and the implications for international HRD. Human Resource Development International, 8(3), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whalley, J., Agarwal, M., Cai, Y., Dong, Y., Tian, H., & Wang, L. (2009). China and the financial crisis. Waterloo: CIGI/Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Task Force.Google Scholar
  67. Whytock, C. A. (2011). The evolving forum shopping system. Cornell Law Review, 96, 481–534.Google Scholar
  68. Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  69. Winston, C. (2006). Government failure versus market failure. Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.Google Scholar
  70. Wong, P. S. S., Neck, P. A., & McKenna, B. (2013). Spiritual wisdom of Taoism in business: Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Yang, D. C. (2010). The present state of evaluation of civil servants and the policy recommendation (in Chinese). Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 6, 68–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.The Martin School, University of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.China Executive Leadership AcademyPudongChina

Personalised recommendations