Forensic Cytology

  • Reinhard B. Dettmeyer
Chapter

Abstract

The importance of forensic cytology lies in the microscopic detection of particular cells. For example, cytology is used to detect or rule out the presence of intact sperm, or at least sperm heads, following sexual offenses. Vaginal, anal, and oral swabs, as well as swabs from other body sites, are analyzed, as are traces of secretion eluted from, e.g., textile fabrics. Textile fibers can also be analyzed microscopically for adherent sperm. If a condom was used, swabs may show starch grains. Using Lugol’s solution, an attempt can also be made to detect vaginal epithelial cells, e.g., on the surface of a used condom. Cytological diagnostic methods may also be helpful in the collection of cells to investigate a possible mix-up of samples or to present findings in cases of suspected administration of incompatible blood transfusions.

References

  1. Albrecht K, Schultheiss D, Rothämel T, Breitmeier D, Tröger HD (2004) Der Nachweis von Spermaspuren in der forensischen Medizin. Kriminalistik 8:552–558Google Scholar
  2. Allery JP, Telmon N, Mieusset R, Rouge BD (2001) Cytological detection of spermatozoa: comparison of three staining methods. J Forensic Sci 46:349–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anoruo B, van Oorschot R, Mitchell J, Howells D (2007) Isolating cells from non-sperm cellular mixtures using the PALM microlaser micro dissection system. Forensic Sci Int 173:93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anslinger K, Bayer B, Mack B, Eisenmenger W (2007) Sex-specific fluorescent labelling of cells for laser microdissection and DNA profiling. Int J Legal Med 121:54–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balick MJ (1988) Lycopodium spores found in condom dusting agent. Nature 332:591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balick MJ (1989) Lycopodium spores used in condom manufacture: associated health hazards. Econ Bot 43:373–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banaschak S, Sibbing U, Brinkmann B (1997) Identifizierung von Gewebeproben bei Verdacht auf Materialvertauschung. Pathologe 18:385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkefeld K (1993) Eine Nachweismöglichkeit für Kondombenutzung bei Sexualdelikten. Arch Kriminol 192:37–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackledge RD, Vincenti M (1994) Identification of polydimethylsiloxane lubricant traces from latex condoms in cases of sexual assault. J Forensic Sci Soc 34:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brinkmann B (2004) Forensische DNA-Analytik. Dtsch Ärztebl 101:A2329–A2335Google Scholar
  11. Brinkmann B, Fechner G, Püschel K (1983) Zur Lungenhistologie bei experimentellem Ertrinken. Z Rechtsmed 89:267–277Google Scholar
  12. Brück S, Thias V, Heidorn F, Gruber C, Kramer N, Evers H, Verhoff MA (2010) Sequenzierung aus einzelnen Epithelzellen. HV1 und HV2-Region der mitochondrialen DNA. Rechtsmedizin 20:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castella X, Valles J, Cabezuelo MA, Fernandez R, Artigas A (1992) Fat embolism syndrome and pulmonary microvascular cytology. Chest 101:1710–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cremer U (1994) Zum Nachweis von Präservativrückständen in Vaginalabstrichen. Zbl Rechtsmed 42:425Google Scholar
  15. Di Martino D, Giuffrè G, Staiti N et al (2004) Single sperm cell isolation by laser dissection. Forensic Sci Int 146:S151–S153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliot K, Hill DS, Lambert C et al (2003) Use of laser microdissection greatly improves the recovery of DNA from sperm on microscope slides. Forensic Sci Int 137:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliott K, Hill DS, Lambert C, Burroughes TR, Gill P (2003) Use of laser microdissection greatly improves the recovery of DNA from sperm on microscopic slides. Forensic Sci Int 137:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evers H, Heidorn F, Gruber C, Lasczkowski G, Risse M, Dettmeyer R, Verhoff MA (2009) Investigative strategy for the forensic detection of sperm traces. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 5:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Findlay I, Taylor A, Quirke P et al (1997) DNA-fingerprinting from single cells. Nature 389:555–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. French CEV, Jensen CG, Vintiner SK, Elliot DA, McGlashan SR (2008) A novel histological technique for distinguishing between epithelial cells in forensic casework. Forensic Sci Int 178:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giampalo C, Schneider V, Kowalski BH, Bellaver LA (1987) The cytologic diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism: a critical reappraisal. Diagn Cytopathol 3:126–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hausmann R, Schellmann B (1994) Forensic value of the Lugol’s staining method: further studies on glycogenated epithelium in the male urinary tract. Int J Legal Med 107:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hausmann R, Pregler C, Schellmann B (1994) The value of the Lugol’s iodine staining technique for the identification of vaginal epithelial cells. Int J Legal Med 106:298–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ito N, Hirota T (1992) Histochemical and cytochemical localisation of blood group antigens. Prog Histochem Cytochem 25:1–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Janssen W, Bärtschi G (1964) Vitale und supravitale Reaktionen der Alveolarzellen nach protrahiertem Sauerstoffmangel. Dtsch Z Gesamt Gerichtl Med 55:47–60Google Scholar
  26. Jones EL, Leon JA (2004) Lugol’s test re-examined again: buccal cells. J Forensic Sci 49:64–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Junge A, Dettmeyer R, Madea B (2008) Identification of biological samples in a case of contamination of a cytological slide preparation. J Forensic Sci 53:739–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karger B, Meyer E, Knudsen PJT, Brinkmann B (1996) DNA typing of cellular material on perforating bullets. Int J Legal Med 10:177–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keil W, Kutschka G, Sachs H (1997) Spuren bei sexualstraftaten: zum nachweis von kondomrückständen in vaginal- und penisabstrichen. Kriminalistik 51:439–440Google Scholar
  30. Knudsen PJT (1993) Cytology in ballistics – an experimental investigation of tissue fragments on full metal jacketed bullets using routine cytological techniques. Int J Legal Med 106:15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee KR, Catalano PM, Ortiz-Giroux S (1986) Cytologic diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism. Report of a case with a unique cytologic feature and emphasis on the difficulty of eliminating squamous contamination. Acta Cytol 30:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee WC, Khoo BE, Abdullah AFL (2016) Enhancement of seminal stains using background correction algorithm with colour filters. Forensic Sci Int 263:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leo A, Pedal I (2010) Diagnostic approaches to acute transfusion reactions. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luke JL (1969) Recovery of intact respiratory epithelium from a cloth pillowcase four days following its utilization as a smothering instrument. J Forensic Sci 14:398–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcus BJ, Collins KA, Harley RA (2005) Ancillary studies in amniotic fluid embolism: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 26:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maresch W (1961) Zum Nachweis von Gewebsteilchen an Tatwerkzeugen. Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med 51:560–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Martino D, Giuffre G, Staiti N, Simone A, Le Donne M, Saravo L (2004) Single sperm cell isolation by laser microdissection. Forensic Sci Int 146(Suppl):S151–S153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maynard P, Allwell K, Roux C, Dawson M, Royds D (2001) A protocol for the forensic analysis of condom and personal lubricants found in sexual assault cases. Forensic Sci Int 124:140–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mittal T, Muralidhar Saralaya K, Kuruvilla A, Achary C (2010) Sex determination from buccal mucosa scrapes. Int J Legal Med 123:437–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mukoyama H, Seta S (1986) The determination of blood groups in tissue samples. In: Forensic science progress, vol 1. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murphy GK (1981) Applications of cytology to forensic pathology. Acta Cytol 25:153–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Murray C, McAlister C, Elliot K (2007) Identification and isolation of male cells using fluorescence in situ hybridisation and laser dissection, for use in the investigation of sexual assault. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1:247252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nichols CA, Sens MA (1990) Recovery and evaluation by cytologic techniques of trace material retained on bullets. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 11:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noda H, Yokota M, Tatsumi S, Sugiyama S (2002) Determination of ABO blood grouping from human oral squamous epithelium by the highly sensitive immunohistochemical staining method EnVision+. J Forensic Sci 47:341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oehmichen M (1984) Fortschritte zytologischer Methoden in der forensischen Pathologie. Pathologe 5:200–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Oppitz E (1969) A new colouring method for the determination of sperm cells in sexual assault cases. Arch Kriminol 144:145–148Google Scholar
  47. Pachar JV, Cameron JM (1992) Scanning electron microscopy: application in the identification of diatoms in cases of drowning. J Forensic Sci 37:860–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paterson SK, Jensen CG, Vintiner SK, McGlashan SR (2006) Immunhistochemical staining as a potential method for the identification of vaginal epithelial cells in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 51:1138–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pedal I (1987) Blutgruppen-immunhistochemie. Thieme-Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  50. Pedal I (1995) Immunhistochemische Blutgruppendiagnostik (ABH, Lewis) in der Rechtsmedizin. In: Bratzke HJ, Schröter A (eds) Immunhistochemie in der Rechtsmedizin. Deutsche Hochschulschriften, Egelsbach, pp 14–21Google Scholar
  51. Pedal I, Freislederer A, Reiter C, Depastas G (1990) Zur Immunhistochemie tödlicher Transfusionszwischenfälle. Pathologe 11:143–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Randall B (1988) Gylcogenated squamous epithelia cells as a marker of foreign body penetration in sexual assault. J Forensic Sci 33:511–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Randall B, Riss RE (1985) Penile glycogenated epithelial cells as an indicator of recent vaginal intercourse. Am J Clin Pathol 84:524–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rothwell TJ, Harvey KJ (1978) The limitations of the Lugol’s iodine staining technique for the identification of vaginal epithelial cells. J Forensic Sci Soc 18:181–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sanders CT, Sanchez N, Ballantyne J, Petersen DA (2006a) Laser microdissection separation of pure spermatozoa. J Forensic Sci 51:748–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sanders CT, Sanchez N, Ballantyne J, Peterson DA (2006b) Laser microdissection separation of pure spermatozoa from epithelial cells for short tandem repeat analysis. J Forensic Sci 51:748–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schaefer HE (1981) Virus und Respirationstrakt – morphogenetische Aspekte pulmonaler Veränderungen. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 65:107–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Simons JL, Vintiner SK (2011) Effects of histological staining on the analysis of human DANN from archived slides. J Forensic Sci 56.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01595.x
  59. Undritz E, Hegg P (1959) Die morphologisch-hämatologische und cytologische Untersuchung eingetrockneter Blutflecken. Schweiz Med Wschr 89:1088–1091PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Undritz E, Hegg P (1960) Die morphologische Untersuchung eingetrockneter Blutflecken. II. Teil: Anwendung an einem Beispiel. Schweiz Med Wschr 90:1223–1230Google Scholar
  61. Vandewoestyne M, van Hoofstat D, van Nieuwerburgh F, Deforce D (2009) Automatic detection of spermatozoa for laser capture microdissection. Int J Legal Med 123:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wehner F, Stiegler A, Schulz MM, Wehner HD, Martin D (2007) Immunzytochemische Untersuchungen biologischer Spuren an Tatklingen. Arch Kriminol 219:180–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wehner F, Moos NRM, Wehner HD, Martin D, Schulz MM (2008) Immunocytochemical examinations of biological traces on expanding bullets (QD-PEP). Forensic Sci Int 182:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weitzig L, Schroeder AS, Augustin C, Raupach T, Sehner S, Anders S (2015) Diagnostic value of PSA and AP tests for the detection of spermatozoa in postmortem swabs from the genital and anal region in males. J Forensic Sci 60:41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ziskin D, Moulton R (1948) A comparison of oral and vaginal epithelial smears. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 8:146–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reinhard B. Dettmeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.University Hospital Giessen Institute of Forensic MedicineGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations