Cultivating Assemblages of Learning: From Teaching to Learning and Back to Teaching

  • Yusef Waghid
  • Faiq Waghid
  • Zayd Waghid


In much the same way that Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari (1987: 3) describe the concept of a book, we conceive of Teaching for Change as “lines of flight, movements of deterritorialisation and destratification”. Like Deleuze and Guattari (1987: 4), the lines of flight rupture in all directions with measurable speeds constituting an “assemblage”. We shall now expound on the pedagogic notions espoused through Teaching for Change as assemblages of learning. In order to explain what Teaching for Change comprises, we need to show: first, how it functions; second, with which connection it intensifies; and third, which metamorphosis it undergoes. In this way, we examine Teaching for Change as an assemblage of learning whereby we accentuate some of the pedagogical actions as embedded in Teaching for Change.


  1. Curinga, M. X. (2016). The MOOC and the Multitude. Educational Theory, 66(3), 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateau: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Difference (A. Bass Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Griffiths, M. (2009). Action Research for/as/Mindful of Social Justice. In S. E. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research (pp. 85–98). Washington, DC: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yusef Waghid
    • 1
  • Faiq Waghid
    • 2
  • Zayd Waghid
    • 3
  1. 1.Education Policy StudiesStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Innovative Learning TechnologyCape Peninsula University of TechnologyCape TownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationCape Peninsula University of TechnologyCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations