Towards a Formal Safety Framework for Trajectories

  • Marco A. FeliúEmail author
  • Mariano M. Moscato
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10811)


Trajectory generation is at the heart of an autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Given a navigation context, the UAV has to conceive a trajectory that fulfills its mission goal while avoiding collisions with obstacles and surrounding traffic. This intended trajectory is an idealization of the various actual physical trajectories that the UAV may perform during flight. The validation of actual physical trajectories with respect to their intended counterparts is challenging due to the interaction over time of several uncontrolled factors such as the environmental conditions, measurement errors and the cyber-physical components of the UAV. For this reason, the most common validation technique for trajectory generators is flight simulation, which is not exhaustive and thus cannot prove the actual absence of collisions.

This paper presents a preliminary formal framework to reason about the safety of UAV trajectories with respect to static-obstacle collision avoidance taking account of the uncertainties derived from uncontrolled factors. The proposed framework was formally verified in a mechanical theorem prover. Its application as an oracle for black-box testing validation of trajectory generators is also proposed. Such testing strategy would allow the safety evaluation of trajectories while removing the need for simulation procedures, thus reducing the cost of the validation process.


  1. 1.
    Hagen, G., Guerreiro, N.M., Maddalon, J.M., Butler, R.W.: An efficient universal trajectory language. Technical report TM-2017-219669, NASA (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Howden, W.E.: Introduction to the theory of testing. In: Tutorial: Software Testing and Validation Techniques, pp. 16–19 (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, S.C., Petzen, A., Tokotch, D.: Exploration of detect-and-avoid and well-clear requirements for small UAS maneuvering in an urban environment. In: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 28 November 2017 (2017).
  4. 4.
    Narkawicz, A., Muñoz, C.: Formal verification of conflict detection algorithms for arbitrary trajectories. Reliab. Comput. 17, 209–237 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owre, S., Rushby, J.M., Shankar, N.: PVS: a prototype verification system. In: Kapur, D. (ed.) CADE 1992. LNCS, vol. 607, pp. 748–752. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of AerospaceHamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations