Concluding Scenarios

Chapter

Abstract

The concluding chapter analyzes the most likely future trajectories of the East European security complex. Four main scenarios are identified; in the most probable one, Eastern Europe becomes the arena of a mainly three-cornered rivalry whose actors are Russia, the Franco-German axis and later Germany, and the USA in alliance with the UK and certain East European states (either within NATO or, more likely, through US-UK-Poland-type trilateral alliances); Russia uses hybrid wars and reignited frozen conflicts to expand its sphere of influence within and even outside the CIS, but the active role of the USA prevents it from turning the region into a Hobbesian arena. Tense episodes alternate with more peaceful ones, allowing for the survival of substantial economic cooperation.

Keywords

European union USA Russia The Franco-German axis Germany UK 

References

  1. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bugajski, Janusz. 2016. Only NATO Can Defend Europe. European View 15 (1): 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gove, Michael. 2017. Donald Trump Interview: Brexit Will Be a Great Thing. The Sunday Times, January 15. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/donald-trump-interview-brexit-britain-trade-deal-europe-queen-5m0bc2tns.
  4. Haaland Matlary, Janne, and Tormod Heier (eds.). 2016. Ukraine and Beyond. Russia’s Strategic Security Challenge to Europe. Houndmills, Basingstoke and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Kirby, Will. 2017. Boris Goes Boating! Foreign Minister Takes to the Water as He Meets with Eastern EU Allies. Sunday Express, October 15. http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/866792/boris-johnson-boat-rowing-lake-cheveneyhouse-eu-eastern-europe-brexitbrussels-summit.
  6. Mearsheimer, John. 2010. The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (4): 381–396.Google Scholar
  7. Missiroli, Antonio, Gerald Stang, Jan Joel Andersson, Cristina Barrios, Hugo Brady, Florence Gaub, Eva Gross, Patryk Pawlak, Eva Pejsova, Nicu Popescu, and Thierry Tardy. 2014. A Changing Global Environment. Chaillot Paper 133, December. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Simón, Luis. 2014. Assessing NATO’s Eastern European “Flank”. Parameters 44 (3): 67–79.Google Scholar
  9. Wahl, Peter. 2017. Between Eurotopia and Nationalism: A Third Way for the Future of the EU. Globalizations 14 (1): 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wendt, Alexander. 1999/2003. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentUniversity of the West IndiesSt. AugustineTrinidad and Tobago

Personalised recommendations