Domestic and Geopolitical Factors: Moldova as a CIS Case Study

  • Theodor Tudoroiu


Chapter 7 shows the importance of small state agency within the CIS using the case study of Moldova. The tiny post-Soviet republic is marked by poverty, corruption, state capture, the frozen conflict of Transnistria, and the failed frozen conflict of Gagauzia that was almost reignited during the 2014 Ukrainian crisis. Moscow has made considerable efforts to bring it within its sphere of influence. Paradoxically, it has failed because of the strong pro-EU attitude of the corrupt and highly unpopular oligarch in control of the Moldovan Parliament and government. But in response to his undemocratic practices, the electorate has become largely pro-Russian. A Kremlin-friendly President was elected and might also win the 2018 parliamentary elections.


Moldova Russia Frozen conflict State capture Commonwealth of independent states Sphere of influence 


  1. Baltag, Dorina, and Giselle Bosse. 2016. The EU’s Eastern Partnership with Moldova: A “Best-Case” Scenario for EU Security Community-Building? In External Governance as Security Community Building, The Limits and Potential of the European Neighbourhood Policy, ed. Pernille Rieker, 49–77. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, Martin. 2013. Two Senior European Figures Have Issued a Warning to Moldova That It Risks Damaging Its EU Accession Ambitions. The Parliament, May 7.
  3. Barbăroşie, Arcadie, Oazu Nantoi, Igor Boțan, Anatol Gremalschi, Vlad Lupan, Viorel Cibotaru, Eugen Revenco, Dumitru Mînzărari, and Radu Vrabie. 2008. Synthesized Vision Over the Transnistrian Issue. Chişinău: The Black Sea Trust for Regional Cooperation, Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  4. Bogaards, Matthijs. 2009. How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism. Democratization 16 (2): 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boţan, Igor. 2006. Alegerile din Găgăuzia., November 30.
  6. Boţan, Igor. 2008. Elections in Gagauzia as Prelude of Parliamentary Elections., May 31.
  7. Boţan, Igor. 2013. Gâlceava dintre Comrat şi Chişinău. Europa Liberă, August 12.
  8. Boţan, Igor. 2015. Real and Imagined Dangers in the Elections in Gagauzia., March 16.
  9. Boţan, Igor. 2016a. Pre-Electoral Context., September 2.
  10. Boţan, Igor. 2016b. The Main Trends in the Presidential Elections of 2016., September 16.
  11. Braun, Aurel. 2012. Resetting Russian-Eastern European Relations for the 21st Century. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45 (3–4): 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budianschi, Dumitru. 2017. The Cost of Corruption in the Republic of Moldova and Who Covers It. Expert Group, November 17.
  13. Całus, Kamil. 2016a. Igor Dodon Has Won the Presidential Election in Moldova. Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, November 14.
  14. Całus, Kamil. 2016b. Moldova: From Oligarchic Pluralism to Plahotniuc’s Hegemony. OSW Commentary, April 11.
  15. Całus, Kamil. 2016c. The Unfinished State. 25 Years of Independent Moldova. OSW Studies, December 14.
  16. Całus, Kamil. 2017a. Pro-Russian Turn or Preservation of “Oligarchic” Status Quo? Moldova After the Presidential Elections. EU-STRAT Newsletter, 2, January 24.
  17. Całus, Kamil. 2017b. The Transnistrian Gambit. New Eastern Europe, December 21.
  18. Călugăreanu, Vitalie. 2012a. Merkel vine la Chişinău să europenizeze, nu să federalizeze Moldova. Deutsche Welle, August 22.şinău-să-europenizeze-nu-să-federalizeze-moldova/a-16184197.
  19. Călugăreanu, Vitalie. 2012b. Merkel la Chişinău: A zgâlţânat Moscova şi a încurajat Chişinăul. Deutsche Welle, August 23.şinău-a-zgâlţânat-moscova-şi-a-încurajat-chişinăul/a-16188921.
  20. Călugăreanu, Vitalie. 2015. Cel mai “geopolitic” scrutin din Autonomia Găgăuză. Deutsche Welle, March 10.
  21. Ceapai, Alla. 2014a. Rusia impune embargo total pe importul de carne din Moldova. RFE/RL, October 22.
  22. Ceapai, Alla. 2014b. Rusia și vinul ca armă a diplomației cu tendință. Europa Liberă, March 6.
  23. Chilianu, Nadine. 2014. Pericolul din sud sau lecţia neînvăţată a lui Formuzal. Jurnal de Chişinău, June 13.
  24. Chinn, Jeff, and Steven D. Roper. 1998. Territorial Autonomy in Gagauzia. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 26 (1): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ciobanu, Vitalie. 2013a. Limba română şi buna guvernare. Europa Liberă, October 9.
  26. Ciobanu, Vitalie. 2013b. Tendințe separatiste printre găgăuzi. Europa Liberă, August 7.
  27. Ciobanu, Vitalie. 2014. Separatism versus unitate națională. Europa Liberă, February 5.
  28. Cojocaru, Gheorghe. 2013. Absurditatea interzicerii predării limbii române ţinteşte în sfera sensibilă a chestiunii identitare. Europa Liberă, October 17.
  29. Cojocaru, Natalia. 2006. Nationalism and Identity in Transnistria. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 19 (3): 261–274.Google Scholar
  30. Commission of the European Communities. 2007. Republic of Moldova. Country Strategy Paper 2007–2013.
  31. Crowther, William. 2004. Moldova’s Post-Communist Transition: Ambiguous Democracy, Reluctant Reform. In The EU & Moldova: On a Fault-Line of Europe, ed. Ann Lewis, 27–48. London: Federal Trust for Education and Research.Google Scholar
  32. Deleu, Xavier. 2005. Transnistrie. La poudrière de l’Europe. Paris: Hugo et Compagnie.Google Scholar
  33. Devyatkov, Andrey. 2017. Dynamics of Russian Power in Moldova. Moldova Monthly, March 22. Foreign Policy Research Institute.
  34. Diamond, Larry. 2002. Thinking About Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dima, Nicholas. 1999. The Moldavian-Dnestr Republic: A Geo-Political Game. The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies 24 (1): 37–63.Google Scholar
  36. EADaily. 2017. Dodon: Transnistria Comprehends It Has No Future Without Moldova, December 13.
  37. 2014. Parliamentary Elections in Moldova on November 30, 2014.
  38. 2016. Messages and Priorities of the pro-Eurasians October 4, 2016.
  39. EU4Business. 2017. EU4Business MOLDOVA Country Report 2017, May 31.
  40. March 25, 2014. Bașcanul găgăuz Mihail Formuzal discută la Moscova chestiuni economice și politice.
  41. European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. 2017. Association Implementation Report on the Republic of Moldova, Joint Staff Working Document SWD (2017) 110 final, Brussels, March 10.
  42. March 18, 2014. Găgăuzii vor să formeze garda populară.
  43. Formuzal, Mihail. 2014. Trăim în aceeași țară și trebuie să facem tot posibilul pentru ca statul nostru să fie puternic, January 30.
  44. Freedom House. 2015. Freedom in the World 2015. Moldova.
  45. Freedom House. 2016. Freedom in the World 2016. Moldova.
  46. Freedom House. 2017a. Freedom in the World 2017. Moldova.
  47. Freedom House. 2017b. Nations in Transit 2017. Moldova. Country Profile.
  48. Freedom House. 2017c. Nations in Transit 2017, ‘Methodology’.’
  49. Galeotti, Mark. 2004. The Transdnistrian Connection: Big Problems from a Small Pseudo-State. Global Crime 6 (3): 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gancev, Vasile. 2016. Rusia, Germania și Transnistria au încolțit Moldova la Berlin. Negocierile în format “5 + 2” merg împotriva principiilor Chișinăului. moldNova, June 15.
  51. Gazeta de Cluj. 2014. Dosarul diversionistilor de la Comrat. Mărturiile condamnaților, September 29.
  52. Ghinea, Cristian, and Sergiu Panainte. 2009. The Political System from the Republic of Moldova and Its Evolution. In Moldova: At the Crossroads, ed. Sergiu Panainte, 97–124. Soros Fondation Romania: Bucharest.Google Scholar
  53. Goble, Paul. 2014. Moldova’s Gagauzia: A Model for Resolution of Karabakh Dispute? Eurasia Daily Monitor 11 (133), July 22.
  54. Gonciarenko, Roman. 2012. Germania găzduieşte o reuniune privind conflictul din Transnistria. Deutsche Welle¸ June 20.ăzduieşte-o-reuniune-privind-conflictul-din-transnistria/a-16038887.
  55. Hanne, Gottfried. 2004. The “Dniester Moldovan Republic:” Building an Authoritarian State. In The EU & Moldova: On a Fault-Line of Europe, ed. Ann Lewis, 79–86. London: Federal Trust for Education and Research.Google Scholar
  56. Heintz, Monica (ed.). 2008. Weak State, Uncertain Citizenship: Moldova. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  57. Hellman, Joel S., Geraint Jones, and Daniel Kaufmann. 2000. “Seize the State, Seize the Day.” State Capture, Corruption, and Influence in Transition. Policy Research Working Paper 2444, The World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  58. Insitutul de Politici Publice. 2017. Barometrul de Opinie Publică. Republica Moldova, November.
  59. Institutul pentru Dezvoltare și Inițiative Sociale Viitorul. 2008a. Political & Security Statewatch. Monthly Analytical Bulletin on Moldova 14 (7), July.Google Scholar
  60. Institutul pentru Dezvoltare şi Iniţiative Sociale Viitorul. 2008b. Political & Security Statewatch. Monthly Analytical Bulletin on Moldova 16 (9), September.Google Scholar
  61. International Crisis Group. 2017. Moldova, November 2017.
  62. International Republican Institute. 2017. Public Opinion Survey. Residents of Moldova, September–October.
  63. IPN. April 7, 2015. Irina Vlah: Government of Moldova Makes a Mistake by not Paying Attention to Gagauzia.
  64. February 13, 2013. Vlad Filat: O persoană obscură ține RM sub asediu oligarhic.
  65. January 2, 2018. Igor Dodon, suspendat din funcție de Curtea Constituțională.
  66. Kapitonenko, Mykola. 2009. Resolving Post-Soviet “Frozen Conflicts:” Is Regional Integration Helpful? Caucasian Review of International Affairs 3 (1): 37–44.Google Scholar
  67. Katchanovski, Ivan. 2005. Small Nations But Great Differences: Political Orientations and Cultures of the Crimean Tatars and the Gagauz. Europe-Asia Studies 57 (6): 877–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Keating, Michael. 1999. Rethinking the Region. Culture, Institutions and Economic Development in Catalonia and Galicia, ECPR Workshop, Regionalism Revisited. Territorial Politics in the Age of Globalization, Mannheim, March.
  69. Keating, Michael. 2001. Nations Against the State: The New Politics of Nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  70. King, Charles. 1997. Minorities Policy in the Post-Soviet Republics: The Case of the Gagauzi. Ethnic and Racial Studies 20 (4): 738–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. King, Charles. 2003. Marking Time in the Middle Ground: Contested Identities and Moldovan Foreign Policy. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 19 (3): 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lecours, André. 2001. Political Institutions, Elites, and Territorial Identity Formation in Belgium. National Identities 3 (1): 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lobjakas, Ahto. 2010. Moldova Impresses EU with Reform Agenda, Receives $2.6 Billion In Pledges. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, March 24.
  74. Lungu, Galina. 2009. Populaţia băştinaşă a Transnistriei a fost neîntrerupt românească. Vocea Basarabiei, September 28.
  75. Lupușor, Adrian, Alexandru Fală, Ana Popa, Denis Cenușă, and Iurie Morcotîlo. 2017. Republic of Moldova 2017: State of the Country Report, Expert Grup, Chișinău.
  76. Marandici, Ion. 2017. Moldova between Scylla and Charybdis: Foreign Threats and Domestic Issues. Moldova Monthly, Foreign Policy Research Institute, April 20.
  77. March, Luke. 2007. From Moldovanism to Europeanization? Moldova’s Communists and Nation Building. Nationalities Papers 35 (4): 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Menz, Astrid. 2005. The Gagauz, Institutionen för lingvistik och filologi, Uppsala Universitet.
  79. Mînzărari, Dumitru. 2008. EU-Moldova Action Plan: An Unfinished Task or a Complete Failure? Institutul pentru Dezvoltare şi Iniţiative Sociale Viitorul, Discussion Paper no. 2, January–July.Google Scholar
  80. Mînzărari, Dumitru. 2009. Russian Foreign Policy as an Obstacle to Democratic Development in Post-Soviet Area, Institutul pentru Dezvoltare şi Iniţiative Sociale Viitorul, Discussion Paper no. 5, March–May.Google Scholar
  81. Mînzărari, Dumitru. 2014. The Gagauz Referendum in Moldova: A Russian Political Weapon? Eurasia Daily Monitor 11 (23), February 5.
  82. Missiroli, Antonio, Gerald Stang, Jan Joel Andersson, Cristina Barrios, Hugo Brady, Florence Gaub, Eva Gross, Patryk Pawlak, Eva Pejsova, Nicu Popescu and Thierry Tardy. 2014. A Changing Global Environment. Chaillot Paper 133, December. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  83. Moldova Azi, June 7, 2010. Merkel, Medvedev Say They Want New EU-Russia Security Committee.
  84. Moldova Azi, December 2, 2010. OSCE Lacks Leverage for Settling Regional Conflicts—Angela Merkel.
  85. Munteanu, Igor, Iulian Chifu, Romaniţa Berghia, Iulian Fruntașu, Nicolae Chirtoacă, Valeriu Prohniţchi, Dan Dungaciu, Boris Asarov, Radu Gorincioi, and Ion Naval. 2007. Moldova on the Way to Democracy and Stability: From the Post-Soviet Space towards the World of Democratic Values. Chişinău: Cartier.Google Scholar
  86. Neukirch, Claus. 2002. Russia and the OSCE: The Influence of Interested Third and Disinterested Fourth Parties on the Conflicts in Estonia and Moldova. In National Integration and Violent Conflict in Post-Soviet Societies: The Cases of Estonia and Moldova, ed. Pål Kolstø, 233–248. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  87. OSCE. 2017. Protocol of the Official Meeting of the Permanent Conference for Political Questions in the Framework of the Negotiating Process on the Transdniestrian Settlement, Vienna, November 27–28.
  88. Panainte, Sergiu (ed.). 2009. Moldova: At the Crossroads. Bucharest: Soros Fondation Romania.Google Scholar
  89. Parliament of the Republic of Moldova. 2013. Raportul Comisiei de Anchetă pentru elucidarea modului de administrare de către organele abilitate a incidentului din 23 decembrie 2012 care a avut loc in rezervaţia naturală “Pădurea Domnească”, CA No. 58, February 14.–doc-raportul-integral-al-comisie-de-ancheta-pe-cazul-vanatorii-din-padurea-domneasca-57380.html and
  90. Popescu, Nicu. 2005. The EU in Moldova—Settling Conflicts in the Neighbourhood. European Union Institute for Security Studies Occasional Paper No. 60.Google Scholar
  91. Popșoi, Mihai. 2016. Moldova Torn Between Past and Future Ahead of Presidential Run-offs. E-Note, Foreign Policy Research Institute, November 9.
  92. RFE/RL. February 3, 2014. Gagauzia Voters Reject Closer EU Ties for Moldova.
  93. RIA Novosti. October 20, 2014. Lavrov Calls “Scandalous” Moldova’s Abuse of Anti-EU Integration Parties.
  94. Rieker, Pernille (ed.). 2016. External Governance As Security Community Building. The Limits and Potential of the European Neighbourhood Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  95. România Liberă. June 6, 2014. Găgăuzia amenință cu declararea independenței, dacă R. Moldova semnează Acordul cu UE.–daca-r–moldova-semneaza-acordul-cu-ue-338191.
  96. Roper, Steven D. 2001. Regionalism in Moldova: The Case of Transnistria and Gagauzia. Regional & Federal Studies 11 (3): 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Roper, Steven D. 2002. Regionalism in Moldova: The Case of Transnistria and Gagauzia. In Ethnicity and Territory in the Former Soviet Union: Regions in Conflict, ed. James Hughes, and Gwendolyn Sasse, 101–122. London: F. Cass.Google Scholar
  98. Sasse, Gwendolyn. 2007. The Crimea Question: Identity, Transition, and Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Şerban, Lavinia. 2011. Russian Oligarchy is Seizing the Republic of Moldova. Nine O’Clock, March 2.
  100. Solomon, Constantin, and Artur Gumeniuc. 2008. Conflictul transnistrean şi procesul de negocieri în formatul ‘5+2’. Moldoscopie (Probleme de analiză politică) 17 (3): 176–179.Google Scholar
  101. The New York Times. October 27, 2010. Challenging Russia to Fix a Frozen Feud.Google Scholar
  102. October 20, 2014. Lavrov amenință UE: Dacă aplică în R. Moldova “scenariul ucrainean”, consecințele vor fi grave.–moldova-scenariul-ucrainean-consecinele-vor-fi-grave-64989.html.
  103. Transparency International Moldova. 2017. State Capture: The Case of the Republic of Moldova.
  104. Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2011a. Communism for the 21st Century: The Moldovan Experiment. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (2): 291–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2011b. Structural Factors vs. Regime Change: Moldova’s Difficult Quest for Democracy. Democratization 18 (1): 236–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2012. The European Union, Russia, and the Future of the Transnistrian Frozen Conflict. East European Politics and Societies 26 (1): 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2015. Democracy and State Capture in Moldova. Democratization 22 (4): 655–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2016. Unfreezing Failed Frozen Conflicts: A Post-Soviet Case Study. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24 (3): 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ungureanu, Vadim. 2014. Anatolii Cara, “mâna lui Formuzal”, urmărit internațional., August 19.–Anatolii-Cara-m%C3%A2na-lui-Formuzal-URM%C4%82RIT-INTERNA%C8%9AIONAL.htm.
  110. Unimedia. March 27, 2014. Posturi de poliție în Găgăuzia? Recean: Nu tolerăm încălcarea legii.
  111. Way, Lucan A. 2002. Pluralism by Default in Moldova. Journal of Democracy 13 (4): 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Way, Lucan A. 2003. Weak State and Pluralism: The Case of Moldova. East European Politics and Societies 17 (3): 454–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zabarah, Dareg A. 2012. Opportunity Structures and Group Building Processes: An Institutional Analysis of the Secession Processes in Pridnestrovie and Gagauzia between 1989 and 1991. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45 (1–2): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Ziarul de Gardă. August 3, 2009. Voronin, cel mai bogat, corupt, cinic şi autoritar.
  115. Ziarul de Gardă. June 10, 2014. SIS s-a autosesizat pe marginea întâlnirii “secrete” dintre Formuzal, Garbuz și Episcopul Markel.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentUniversity of the West IndiesSt. AugustineTrinidad and Tobago

Personalised recommendations