Advertisement

Geopolitical Approaches, Regional Security Complexes, and Political Psychology

  • Theodor Tudoroiu
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter constructs the book’s theoretical framework, which is based on Stefano Guzzini’s view of neoclassical geopolitics enriched with elements from the Regional Security Complex Theory. The resulting thin cognitivist approach accordingly combines materialist and ideational elements. Its object of study is the East European regional security complex, which is defined as incorporating post-communist EU member states, the rest of the European Union, western CIS republics, and Russia. Two external powers, the USA and the post-Brexit UK, penetrate this complex. In addition, the chapter presents theoretical aspects of hybrid wars, genuine and failed frozen conflicts, state capture, and political psychology relevant to the various issues analyzed in the book.

Keywords

Neoclassical geopolitics Regional Security Complex Theory Hybrid wars Frozen conflicts State capture 

References

  1. Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett (eds.). 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agnew, John. 2003. Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Agnew, John. 2004. Is “Geopolitics” a Word That Should Be Endowed Only with the Meaning It Acquired in the Early Twentieth Century?, in Alexander B. Murphy, Mark Bassin, David Newman, Paul Reuber, and John Agnew. Is There a Politics to Geopolitics? Progress in Human Geography 28 (5): 619–640, 634–637.Google Scholar
  4. Astrov, Alexander, and Natalia Morozova. 2012. Russia: Geopolitics from the Heartland. In The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises, ed. Stefano Guzzini, 192–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balzacq, Thierry (ed.). 2011. Securitization Theory. How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Barrinha, André. 2014. The Ambitious Insulator: Revisiting Turkey’s Position in Regional Security Complex Theory. Mediterranean Politics 19 (2): 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassin, Mark. 2004. The Two Faces of Contemporary Geopolitics, in Alexander B. Murphy, Mark Bassin, David Newman, Paul Reuber, and John Agnew. Is There a Politics to Geopolitics? Progress in Human Geography 28 (5): 619–640, 620–626.Google Scholar
  8. Bellamy, Alex J. 2004. Security Communities and Their Neighbours. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bond, Margaret. 2007. Hybrid War: A New Paradigm for Stability Operations in Failing States. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brass, Paul R. 1991. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bremberg, Niklas. 2015. The European Union as Security Community-Building Institution: Venues, Networks and Co-operative Security Practices. Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (3): 674–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzan, Barry. 1991. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar
  13. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, Saul Bernard. 2015. Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  16. Conley, Heather A., James Mina, Ruslan Stefanov, and Martin Vladimirov. 2016. The Kremlin Playbook: Understanding Russian Influence in Central and Eastern Europe, October. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/kremlin-playbook.
  17. Deutsch, Karl W. 1954. Political Community at the International Level. Problems of Definition and Measurement. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  18. Deutsch, Karl W., Sidney A. Burrell, Robert A. Kann, Maurice Lee Jr., Martin Lichterman, Raymond E. Lindgren, Francis L. Loewenheim, and Richard W. van Wagenen. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Diez, Thomas, Ingvild Bode, and Aleksandra Fernandes da Costa. 2011. Key Concepts in International Relations, 198–204. SAGE Key Concepts Series. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Erdağ, Ramazan. 2017. Libya in the Arab Spring. From Revolution to Insecurity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Exner-Pirot, Heather. 2013. What Is the Arctic a Case of? The Arctic as a Regional Environmental Security Complex and the Implications for Policy. The Polar Journal 3 (1): 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman, Christopher. 2001. The European Security Complex—Fait Accompli? A Critique of the Copenhagen School. Peacekeeping and International Relations 30 (5/6): 7–9.Google Scholar
  23. Fuamba, David, Masako Yonekawa, and Annette Seegers. 2013. Managing Spoilers in a Hybrid War: The Democratic Republic of Congo (1996–2010). Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 40 (2): 319–338.Google Scholar
  24. Gagnon, Valère Philip, Jr. 1994–1995. Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia. International Security 19 (3): 130–166.Google Scholar
  25. Gray, Cheryl, Joel Hellman, and Randi Ryterman. 2004. Anticorruption in Transition 2. Corruption in Enterprise-State Interactions in Europe and Central Asia 1999–2002. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Guzzini, Stefano (ed.). 2012. The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Guzzini, Stefano. 2014. Revival of Geopolitical Thought in Europe. Academic Foresights, 11 (May–August). http://www.academic-foresights.com/Geopolitical_Thought.html.
  28. Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haverluk, Terrence W., Kevin M. Beauchemin, and Brandon A. Mueller. 2014. The Three Critical Flaws of Critical Geopolitics: Towards a Neo-Classical Geopolitics. Geopolitics 19: 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Immelman, Aubrey. 2017. The Leadership Style of U.S. President Donald J. Trump. Working Paper No. 1.0, January, Collegeville and St. Joseph, MN: St. John’s University and the College of St. Benedict, Unit for the Study of Personality in Politics. http://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/psychology_pubs/107/.
  31. Kazan, Isil. 2005. Turkey: Where Geopolitics Still Matters. Contemporary Security Policy 26 (3): 588–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kearns, Gerry. 2009. Geopolitics and Empire. The Legacy of Halford Mackinder. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Keating, Michael. 1999. Rethinking the Region. Culture, Institutions and Economic Development in Catalonia and Galicia. ECPR Workshop, Regionalism Revisited. Territorial Politics in the Age of Globalization, Mannheim, March. http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/649823a9-dd20-46db-bbb9-32c6fda79bf4.pdf.
  34. Keating, Michael. 2001. Nations Against the State: The New Politics of Nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. Koschut, Simon. 2016. Normative Change and Security Community Disintegration. Undoing Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Lake, David A. 2009. Regional Hierarchy: Authority and Local International Order. Review of International Studies 35 (2): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lake, David A., and Patrick M. Morgan. 1997. Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lasica, Daniel T. 2009. Strategic Implications of Hybrid War: A Theory of Victory. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Command and General Staff College.Google Scholar
  39. Lecours, André. 2001. Political Institutions, Elites, and Territorial Identity Formation in Belgium. National Identities 3 (1): 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lynch, Dov. 2004. Engaging Eurasia’s Separatist States: Unresolved Conflicts and De Facto States. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  41. MacFarlane, Stephen Neil. 2008. Frozen Conflicts in the Former Soviet Union—The Case of Georgia/South Ossetia. OSCE Yearbook 2008, 23–33. http://ifsh.de/file-CORE/documents/yearbook/english/08/MacFarlane-en.pdf.
  42. Mamadouh, Virginie, and Gertjan Dijkink. 2006. Geopolitics, International Relations and Political Geography: The Politics of Geopolitical Discourse. Geopolitics 11 (3): 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mattos, Rodrigues Bessa, Francisco Eduardo Beatriz, Lemos de Matos, and Kai Michael Kenkel. 2017. Brazilian Policy and the Creation of a Regional Security Complex in the South Atlantic: Pax Brasiliana? Contexto Internacional 39 (2): 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCuen, John J. 2008. Hybrid Wars. Military Review 88 (2): 107–113.Google Scholar
  45. Mead, Walter Russell. 2014. The Return of Geopolitics: The Revenge of the Revisionist Powers. Foreign Affairs 93 (3): 69–79. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2014-04-17/return-geopolitics.
  46. Megoran, Nick. 2010. Neoclassical Geopolitics. Political Geography 29: 187–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Missiroli, Antonio, Gerald Stang, Jan Joel Andersson, Cristina Barrios, Hugo Brady, Florence Gaub, Eva Gross, Patryk Pawlak, Eva Pejsova, Nicu Popescu, and Thierry Tardy. 2014. A Changing Global Environment. Chaillot Paper 133, December. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  48. Musiol, Marek. 2015. Post-Soviet Central Asia as a Unique Regional Security Complex. The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs 24 (4): 59–78.Google Scholar
  49. Newman, David. 2004. An Informed and Proactive Geopolitics, in Alexander B. Murphy, Mark Bassin, David Newman, Paul Reuber, and John Agnew, Is There a Politics to Geopolitics? Progress in Human Geography 28 (5): 619–640, 626–630.Google Scholar
  50. Ó Tuathail, Gearóid. 1996. Critical Geopolitics. The Politics of Writing Global Space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Ó Tuathail, Gearóid, and Simon Dalby (eds.). 1998. Rethinking Geopolitics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Rácz, András. 2015. Russia’s Hybrid War in Ukraine. Breaking the Enemy’s Ability to Resist. FIIA Report 43. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  53. Reuber, Paul. 2004. The Political Representation of Space After the Cold War and in the New Millennium, in Alexander B. Murphy, Mark Bassin, David Newman, Paul Reuber, and John Agnew. Is There a Politics to Geopolitics? Progress in Human Geography 28 (5): 619–640, 630–634.Google Scholar
  54. Rieker, Pernille (ed.). 2016. External Governance as Security Community Building. The Limits and Potential of the European Neighbourhood Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Rosamond, Ben. 2002. Theories of Political Integration. In The European Union Handbook, ed. Jackie Gower. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
  56. Simón, Luis, and James Rogers. 2010. The Return of European Geopolitics. The RUSI Journal 155 (3): 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Socor, Vladimir. 2004. The Frozen Conflicts: A Challenge to Euro-Atlantic Interests (Report Prepared by the German Marshall Fund of the United States, on the Occasion of the NATO Summit 2004). http://www.jamestown.org/fileadmin/Vlads_Corner/policypapers/KonstRon.doc.
  58. Stewart-Ingersoll, Robert, and Derrick Frazier. 2012. Regional Powers and Security Orders: A Theoretical Framework. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Szabo, Stephen F. 2016. Transatlantic Academy’s Szabo: The Future of NATO and European Security. Defense News, December 5. http://www.defensenews.com/articles/transatlantic-academys-szabo-the-future-of-nato-and-european-security.
  60. Taureck, Rita. 2006. Securitisation Theory and Securitisation Studies. Journal of International Relations and Development 9 (1): 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Transparency International Moldova. 2017. State Capture: The Case of the Republic of Moldova. http://www.transparency.md/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/TI_Moldova_State_Capture.pdf.
  62. Troitskiy, Evgeny F. 2015. Central Asian Regional Security Complex: The Impact of Russian and US Policies. Global Society 29 (1): 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2012. The European Union, Russia, and the Future of the Transnistrian Frozen Conflict. East European Politics and Societies 26 (1): 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2015. Democracy and State Capture in Moldova. Democratization 22 (4): 655–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2016. Unfreezing Failed Frozen Conflicts: A Post-Soviet Case Study. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24 (3): 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tusicisny, Andrej. 2007. Security Communities and Their Values: Taking Masses Seriously. International Political Science Review 28 (4): 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wæver, Ole. 1995. Securitization and Desecuritization. In On Security, ed. Ronnie Lipschultz. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
  68. Wiener, Antje, and Thomas Diez. 2009. European Integration Theory, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. World Bank. 2000. Anticorruption in Transition: Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/contribution.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentUniversity of the West IndiesSt. AugustineTrinidad and Tobago

Personalised recommendations