Abstract
In the view of many respondents, the attachment of a raft of expectations to criminal trials did not reflect the reality of what they can provide, or of their function. Expectations were frequently framed by transitional justice practitioners as ‘too high’, ‘unrealistic’, and ‘inappropriate’. According to interviewees, the solution to the expectation gap was “expectation management.” This chapter focuses further on how participants viewed expectations, the key factors influencing expectations of trials (and transitional justice) along with distinctions and similarities between the Tribunal and Chambers. In both of these contexts, the role of the local media is significant in shaping expectations of justice. Interviewee conceptions of expectation management are presented. Expectation management was predominantly understood as top-down and unidirectional, which is problematic from the perspective of serving broader transitional goals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akhavan, P 1998, ‘Justice in The Hague, peace in the former Yugoslavia? A commentary on the United Nations war crimes tribunal’, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 737–816.
Clark, JN 2009, ‘International war crimes tribunals and the challenge of outreach’, International Criminal Law Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 99–116.
Dzihana, A and Hodzic, S 2011, ‘The Karadzic case: The analysis of media reporting about Radovan Karadzic’s arrest and trial’ in Dzihana, A and Volcic, Z (eds), Media and national ideologies: Analysis of reporting on war crime trials in the former Yugoslavia, Media Centar Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Erjavec, K 2011, ‘The case of Dobrovoljacka: An analysis of the Serbian and Bosnian-Herzegovinian daily press’ in Dzihana, A and Volcic, Z (eds), Media and national ideologies: Analysis of reporting on war crime trials in the former Yugoslavia, Media Centar Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Erjavec, K and Volcic, Z 2009a, ‘Journalistic (re)production of history: Televized coverage of Radovan Karadzic’s arrest in Serbia’, Solsko Polje, vol. 20, no. 5/6, pp. 75–99.
Erjavec, K and Volcic, Z 2009b, ‘Rehabilitating Milosevic: Posthumous coverage of the Milosevic regime in Serbian newspapers’, Social Semiotics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 125–147.
Hodzic, R 2010, ‘Living the legacy of mass atrocities: Victims’ perspectives on war crimes trials’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 113–136.
Hussain, V 2005, ‘Sustaining judicial rescues: The role of outreach and capacity-building efforts in war crimes tribunals’, Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 547–561.
Klarin, M 2009, ‘The impact of the ICTY trials on public opinion in the former Yugoslavia’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 89–96.
Korac, M 1993, ‘Serbian nationalism: Nationalism of my own people’, Feminist Review, vol. 45 (Autumn), pp. 108–112.
Markovic, P and Subasic, K 2011, ‘The case of Vukovar: A comparative analysis of reports on trials for war crimes committed in Vukovar in 1991 in The Hague and Belgrade’ in Dzhiana, A and Volcic, Z (eds), Media and national ideologies: Analysis of reporting on war crime trials in the former Yugoslavia, Media Centar Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Nettlefield, LJ 2010, ‘From the battlefield to the barracks: The ICTY and the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 87–109.
Nickson, R 2017, ‘Unmet expectations and the legitimacy of transitional justice institutions’ in Karstedt, S and Brants, C (eds), Engagement, contestation and legitimacy, Hart Publishing, Portland, Oregon.
Pham, P, Vinck, P, Balthazard, M, Hean, S and Stover, E 2009, So we will never forget: A population based survey on attitudes about social reconstruction and The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Human Rights Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Pham, PN, Vinck, P, Balthazard, M, Strasser, J and Om, C 2011. ‘Victim participation and the trial of Duch at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, Journal of Human Rights Practice, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 264–287.
Sebastian, S 2010, ‘Statebuilding in divided societies: The reform of dayton in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 324–344.
Stanley, E 2002, ‘What next? The aftermath of organised truth telling’, Race and Class, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–15.
Verfuss, T 2004, ‘Trying poor countries crimes in a rich city: The problems of the press from the former Yugoslavia’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 509–515.
Zdravkovic-Zonta, H 2011, ‘The case of scorpions: Media, nationalism and war crimes’, in Dzhiana, A and Volcic, Z (eds), Media and national ideologies: Analysis of reporting on war crime trials in the former Yugoslavia, Media Centar Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Zikic, B 2011, ‘The Biljana Plavsic case: Nationalist and gender narratives in the service of media (non)reporting on the Plavsic case in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (The Republika Srspka)’, in Dzhiana, A and Volcic, Z (eds), Media and national ideologies: Analysis of reporting on war crime trials in the former Yugoslavia, Media Centar Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nickson, R., Neikirk, A. (2018). Managing Expectations of the Tribunal and Chambers. In: Managing Transitional Justice. Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77782-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77782-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77781-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77782-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)