Abstract
In this chapter, the application of the Gaussian regression models in the robust design and uncertainty quantification is demonstrated. The computationally effective approach based on the Kriging method and relative expected improvement concept is described in detail. The new sampling criterion is proposed which leads to localization of the robust optimum in a limited number of steps. The methodology is employed to the optimal design process of the intake channel of the small turboprop engine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Forrester, A., Sobester, A., Keane, A.: Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide, Wiley (2008)
Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C., Anderson-Cook, C.M.: Response Surface Methodology. Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 4th edn. Wiley (2016)
Houle, M.E., Kriegel, H.P., Kroger, P., Schubert, E., Zimek, A.: Can shared-neighbor distances defeat the curse of dimensionality? In: SSDBM 2010: Scientific and Statistical Database Management, pp. 482–500
Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M., Welch, W.J.: Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Opt. 13, 455–492 (1998)
Ratvasky, T.P., Barnhart, B.P., Lee, S.: Current methods for modeling and simulating icing effects on aircraft performance. Stab. Control, NASA/TM-2008-215453
Giunta, A.A., Mcfarland, J.M., Swiler, L.P., Eldred, M.S.: The promise and peril of uncertainty quantification using response surface approximations. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2(3–4), 175–189 (2006)
Janusevskis, J., Le Riche, R.: Simultaneous kriging-based sampling for optimization and uncertainty propagation. J. Global Opt. 55(2), 313–336 (2013)
Łaniewski-Wołłik, Ł.: Relative Expected Improvement in Kriging Based Optimization, Cornell University Library (2009). arXiv:0908.3321
McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J., Conover, W.J.: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, technometrics (JSTOR Abstract). Am. Stat. Ass. 21(2), 239–245, May 1979
Eglajs, V., Audze, P.: New approach to the design of multifactor experiments. Prob. Dyn. Strengths, Riga 35, 104–107 (1977)
Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A.: Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 55 (1972)
Constantine, P.G., Dow, E., Wang, Q.: Active subspace methods in theory and practice: applications to kriging surfaces. arXiv:1304.2070
Jones, D.R.: Taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J. Global Opt. 21, 345–383 (2001)
Roustant, O., Ginsbourger, D., Deville, Y.: DiceKriging, DiceOptim: two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by kriging—based metamodeling and optimization. J. Stat. Softw. 51(1) (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marchlewski, K., Łaniewski-Wołłk, Ł., Kubacki, S., Szumbarski, J. (2019). Robust Optimization with Gaussian Process Models. In: Hirsch, C., Wunsch, D., Szumbarski, J., Łaniewski-Wołłk, Ł., Pons-Prats, J. (eds) Uncertainty Management for Robust Industrial Design in Aeronautics . Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 140. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77767-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77767-2_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77766-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77767-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)