Skip to main content

Hades—The Invisible Side of Mathematical Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Philosophy of Mathematics Education Today

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

  • 1889 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter presents a philosophical approach to teaching and learning mathematics in which five philosophical methods are translated into methods of reading and writing mathematical texts. The philosophical approaches are Hermeneutics, Analytical philosophy, Dialectics, Experience based (phenomenological) and Speculative philosophy. We use the acronym HADES for the combination of these approaches. For each of them we present reading and writing material which can be used for teaching peer tutors and by them in their interaction with students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrow, I. (1976). Lectiones Geometricae. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor‘s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. (1963). Tübinger Einleitung in die Philosophie (Vol. 1). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1953). The foundations of arithmetics: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (2010). Wahrheit und Methode (7th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodds, M., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2014). Self-explanation training improves proof comprehension. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45, 62–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies: Special Issue on Metadiscourse, 9, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahnke, H. N. (Ed.). (2009). Geschichte der Analysis. Heidelberg: Spektrum Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipping, C., & Reid, D. (2014). Reconstructing argumentation structures: A perspective on proving processes in secondary mathematics classroom interactions. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 75–101). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (2003). Argumentationsanalyse in der mathematikdidaktischen Unterrichtsforschung. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 35, 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. (1969). Normative logic and ethics. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P., & Lorenz, K. (1978). Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, E. (2003). Methodik des Ethik- und Philosophieunterrichts: Philosophieren als elementare Kulturtechnik. Hannover: Siebert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Rümelin, J., Spiegel, I., & Tiedemann, M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbuch Philosophie und Ethik: Didaktik und Methodik (Vol. 1). Paderborn: Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Ch. (1997). Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking: The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohbeck, J. (2008). Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik. Dresden: Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1948). Human knowledge: Its scope und limits. London: George Allan & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnieder, J. (2013). Mathematikdidaktische Potentiale philosophischer Denkrichtungen. In I. Bausch, T. Wassong, R. Hochmuth, R. Bruder, P. Fischer, & R. Biehler (Eds.), Mathematische Vor- und Brückenkurse (pp. 197–212). Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. (1992). Einführung in die Phänomenologie. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walther Paravicini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paravicini, W., Schnieder, J., Scharlau, I. (2018). Hades—The Invisible Side of Mathematical Thinking. In: Ernest, P. (eds) The Philosophy of Mathematics Education Today. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77760-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77760-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77759-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77760-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics