Advertisement

The Future: Directions for Researchers and Practitioners

  • Andrew Hughes
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Political Marketing and Management book series (Palgrave Studies in Political Marketing and Management)

Abstract

Chapter  8 finishes the book by providing a brief wrap of the ideas, concepts and evidence discussed in earlier chapters. Using these and other works as its basis it provides some work-in-progress conceptual models for political advertising and marketing for researchers and practitioners to discuss and, as long as everyone is nice, debate.

It concludes with some thoughts on the need to maintain an open network of those who research and practice in the field so that evidence can provide the bedrock in which thought and ideas in research can be built.

Keywords

Political marketing conceptual models Political branding Brand emotional response model Policy and issue adoption curve 

References

  1. Briggs, K. E., & Martin, F. H. (2009). Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: Arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72(3), 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dann, S., Harris, P., Mort, G. S., Fry, M. L., & Binney, W. (2007). Reigniting the fire: A contemporary research agenda for social, political and nonprofit marketing. Journal of Public Affairs, 7(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hughes, A. (2014). The relationship between advertisement content and pacing on emotional responses and memory for televised political advertisements. Doctoral thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  4. Hughes, A. (2016). Why negative political ads don’t work on gen Y. In P. Moreau & S. Puntoni (Eds.), NA—Advances in consumer research (Vol. 44, pp. 309–314). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  5. Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity. Marketing Management, 10(2), 14–19.Google Scholar
  6. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions. Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Schmitt, B. (2011). Experience marketing: Concepts, frameworks and consumer insights. Foundations and Trends® in Marketing, 5(2), 55–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Hughes
    • 1
  1. 1.Research School of ManagementAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations