Advertisement

Immersive Edition of Multisensory 360 Videos

  • Hugo Coelho
  • Miguel Melo
  • Luís Barbosa
  • José Martins
  • Mário Sérgio
  • Maximino Bessa
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 746)

Abstract

The current technologic proliferation has originated new paradigms concerning the production and consumption of multimedia content. This paper proposes a multisensory 360 video editor that allows producers to edit such contents with high levels of customization. This authoring tool allows the edition and visualization of 360 video with the novelty of allowing to complement the 360 video with multiple stimuli such as audio, haptics, and olfactory. In addition to this multisensory feature, the authoring tool allows customizing individually each of the stimuli to provide an optimal multisensory user experience.

A usability evaluation has revealed the pertinence of the editor, where it was verified an effectiveness rate of 100%, only one help request out of 10 participants, and positive efficiency. Satisfaction-wise, results equally revealed high level of satisfaction as the average score was 8.3 out of 10.

Keywords

Virtual reality Multisensory 360 video Interactive edition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was also partially supported by the project “DOUROTUR, Turismo e Inovação Tecnológica no Douro/NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000014” financed by the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, and through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). All the works were conducted at INESC TEC’s MASSIVE VR Laboratory.

References

  1. 1.
    Bleumers, L., Van den Broeck, W., Lievens, B., Pierson, J.: Seeing the bigger picture: a user perspective on 360 TV. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, EuroiTV 2012, pp. 115–124. ACM, New York (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325640. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2325616.2325640
  2. 2.
    Brooke, J., et al.: Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usabili. Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ButtKicker: The ButtKicker LFE Kit (2017). http://www.thebuttkicker.com/lfe-kit
  4. 4.
    DiLaura, D.L., Houser, K.W., Mistrick, R.G., Steffy, G.R.: The Lighting Handbook: Reference and Application. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dix, A.: Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freitas, J., Meira, C., Melo, M., Barbosa, L., Bessa, M.: Information system for the management and visualization of multisensorial contents. In: 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fuchs, P., Moreau, G., Guitton, P.: Virtual Reality: Concepts and Technologies. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO 9241–125:2017: Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Israr, A., Schwemler, Z., Mars, J., Krainer, B.: VR360HD: a VR360 player with enhanced haptic feedback. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 183–186. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kirakowski, J., Corbett, M.: Sumi: the software usability measurement inventory. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 24(3), 210–212 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MarketsandMarkets: Head-Mounted Display Market by Component (Hardware and Software), Application (Aviation & Tactical, Engineering, Medical, Training & Simulation, and Others), Product (Head-Mounted and Eyewear), Technology, and Geography - Global Trend and Forecast to 2020. Technical report (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman, K.L., Shneiderman, B., Harper, B., Slaughter, L.: Questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction. University of Maryland (Norman, 1989) Disponível em (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oculus: Oculus rift — oculus (2017). https://www.oculus.com/rift/
  14. 14.
    Ramalho, J., Chambel, T.: Sensing immersive 360 mobile interactive video. In: 2014 International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (GRAPP), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    SensoryCo: SmX-4D series - SensoryCo TS (2017). http://www.sensorycots.com/smx-4d-series
  16. 16.
    Visch, V.T., Tan, E.S., Molenaar, D.: The emotional and cognitive effect of immersion in film viewing. Cogn. Emot. 24(8), 1439–1445 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Coelho
    • 1
  • Miguel Melo
    • 2
  • Luís Barbosa
    • 1
    • 2
  • José Martins
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mário Sérgio
    • 1
  • Maximino Bessa
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila RealPortugal
  2. 2.INESC TECPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations