IAQ Evaluation Using an IoT CO2 Monitoring System for Enhanced Living Environments

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 746)

Abstract

Indoor air quality (IAQ) parameters are not only directly related to occupational health but also have a huge impact on quality of life. In particular, besides having a very influence on the public health as it may cause a great variety of health effects such as headaches, dizziness, restlessness, difficulty breathing, increase heart rate, elevated blood pressure, coma and asphyxia, carbon dioxide (CO2) can be used as an important index of IAQ. In fact, due to people spend about 90% of our lives indoors, it is extremely important to monitor the CO2 concentration in real-time to detect problems in the IAQ in order to quickly take interventions in the building to increase the IAQ. The variation of CO2 in indoor living environments is in most situations related to the low air renewal inside buildings. CO2 levels over 1000 ppm, indicate a potential problem with indoor air. This paper aims to present iAirC a solution for CO2 real-time monitoring based on Internet of Things (IoT) architecture. This solution is composed by a hardware prototype for ambient data collection and a web and smartphone compatibility for data consulting. This system performs real-time data collection that is stored in a ThingSpeak platform and has smartphone compatibility which allows easier access to data in real time. The user can also check the latest data collected by the system and access to the history of the CO2 levels in a graphical representation. iAirC uses an open-source ESP8266 for Wi-Fi 2.4 GHZ as processing and communication unit and incorporates a CO2 sensor as sensing unit.

Keywords

IAQ (Indoor air quality) Monitoring IoT (Internet of Things) Energy efficiency Smart cities iOS 

References

  1. 1.
    Universal open platform and reference specification for ambient assisted living. http://www.universaal.org/
  2. 2.
    Koleva, P., Tonchev, K., Balabanov, G., Manolova, A., Poulkov, V.: Challenges in designing and implementation of an effective Ambient Assisted Living system. In: 2015 12th International Conference on Telecommunication in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS), pp. 305–308 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seguel, J.M., Merrill, R., Seguel, D., Campagna, A.C.: Indoor air quality. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 11, 284–295 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827616653343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruce, N., Perez-Padilla, R., Albalak, R.: Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge. Bull. World Health Organ. 78(9), 1078–1092 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones, A.P.: Indoor air quality and health. Atmos. Environ. 33(28), 4535–4564 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P.: Smart cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 18(2), 65–82 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) The Future Internet, vol. 6656, pp. 431–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chourabi, H., et al.: Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework, pp. 2289–2297 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., Zorzi, M.: Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 1(1), 22–32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Batty, M., et al.: Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214(1), 481–518 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hernández-Muñoz, J.M., et al.: Smart cities at the forefront of the future internet. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) The Future Internet, vol. 6656, pp. 447–462. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu, T.-C., et al.: Wireless sensor networks for indoor air quality monitoring. Med. Eng. Phys. 35(2), 231–235 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Myers, S.S., et al.: Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature 510(7503), 139–142 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tran, T.V., Dang, N.T., Chung, W.-Y.: Battery-free smart-sensor system for real-time indoor air quality monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 248, 930–939 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abraham, S., Li, X.: A cost-effective wireless sensor network system for indoor air quality monitoring applications. Procedia Comput. Sci. 34, 165–171 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim, J.-Y., Chu, C.-H., Shin, S.-M.: ISSAQ: an integrated sensing systems for real-time indoor air quality monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 14(12), 4230–4244 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marques, G., Pitarma, R.: An indoor monitoring system for ambient assisted living based on internet of things architecture. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13(11), 1152 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pitarma, R., Marques, G., Caetano, F.: Monitoring indoor air quality to improve occupational health. In: New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 13–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marques, G., Pitarma, R.: Health informatics for indoor air quality monitoring, pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pitarma, R., Marques, G., Ferreira, B.R.: Monitoring indoor air quality for enhanced occupational health. J. Med. Syst. 41(2), 23 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marques, G., Pitarma, R.: Monitoring health factors in indoor living environments using internet of things. In: Presented at the World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 785–794 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marques, G., Pitarma, R.: Monitoring and control of the indoor environment, pp. 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, S., Chang, M.: Indoor and outdoor air quality investigation at schools in Hong Kong. Chemosphere 41(1–2), 109–113 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bhattacharya, S., Sridevi, S., Pitchiah, R.: Indoor air quality monitoring using wireless sensor network, pp. 422–427 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seppanen, O.A., Fisk, W.J., Mendell, M.J.: Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. Indoor Air 9(4), 226–252 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramachandran, G., et al.: Indoor air quality in two urban elementary schools—measurements of airborne fungi, carpet allergens, CO2, temperature, and relative humidity. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2(11), 553–566 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scheff, P.A., Paulius, V.K., Huang, S.W., Conroy, L.M.: Indoor air quality in a middle school, Part I: use of CO2 as a tracer for effective ventilation. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 15(11), 824–834 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wargocki, P., Wyon, D.P., Sundell, J., Clausen, G., Fanger, P.O.: The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. Indoor Air 10(4), 222–236 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Neuburg, M.: iOS 7 Programming Fundamentals: Objective-C, Xcode, and Cocoa Basics. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lacis, A.A., Schmidt, G.A., Rind, D., Ruedy, R.A.: Atmospheric CO2: principal control knob governing earth’s temperature. Science 330(6002), 356–359 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Awbi, H.B.: Ventilation of Buildings. Taylor & Francis, London (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polytechnic Institute of Guarda – Unit for Inland DevelopmentGuardaPortugal

Personalised recommendations