Characterization of an Evaluation Success Model of an IS Project, Focused on Stakeholders

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 745)

Abstract

Typically, we measure the success of an Information Technology project through time, budget and quality. However, with the advance of years, we found that stakeholders have also something to say about success evaluation. Each stakeholder has an impact, its own interests and expectations about the project development. Therefore, what for some can be considered a success, for others can be considered a failure, because each one has a different perspective on the same project. This short paper proposes a flexible success evaluation model for an Information Technology project, called Success Breakdown Structure (SBS). In this model, the various stakeholders present in a project are presented, as well as their success assessment criteria over three different visions: after the completion of the project, after a few months and last, after a few years. From the obtained results, we can conclude that the evaluation of a project success is not concern of project managers only, but is transversal to all stakeholders.

Keywords

Project Project management Success Stakeholders Success criteria Success evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Freeman, M., Beale, P.: Measuring project success. Proj. Manage. J. 23(1), 8–17 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dalcher, D., Drevin, L.: Learning from information systems failures by using narrative and ante-narrative methods. S. Afr. Comput. J. 2004(33), 88–97 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turner, R., Zolin, R.: Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Proj. Manage. J. 43(5), 87–99 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morris, P.W.G., Hough, G.H.: The anatomy of major projects: a study of the reality of project management (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xue, Y.: A results-based monitoring and evaluation system for key infrastructure projects. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, Lille School of Management, Lille, France (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atkinson, R.: Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 17(6), 337–342 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, A.M.M., Walker, A.: Evaluation of project outcomes. Constr. Manage. Econ. 16(2), 209–219 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baccarini, D.: The logical framework method for defining project success. Proj. Manage. J. 30(4), 25–32 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Egorova, E., Torchiano, M., Morisio, M., Wohlin, C., Aurum, A., Svensson, R.B.: Stakeholders perception of success: an empirical investigation. In: 35th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oliveira, J.N., Amaral, L.A.: O papel da qualidade da informação nos sistemas de informação. In: Departamento de Sistemas de Informação. Conferência Especializada em Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação. Repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soares, D.D.S.: Planeamento de sistemas de informação: estudo das variáveis que condicionam a sua estratégia de execução (1998). http://hdl.handle.net/1822/676. repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt
  12. 12.
    Project Management Institute: Project Management Body of Knowledge Guide, 5th edn. Project Management Institute (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Office of Government Commerce: Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2, 5th edn. Office of Government Commerce (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, L.W.: Project clarity through stakeholder analysis. In: CrossTalk (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Project Management Institute: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shenhar, A., Dvir, D.: Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turner, R., Zolin, R., Remington, K.: Monitoring the performance of complex projects from multiple perspectives over multiple time frames. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Research Network of Project Management Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lim, C.S., Mohamed, M.Z.: Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 17(4), 243–248 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davis, K.: Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 32(2), 189–201 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information System Department, Algoritmi CenterMinho UniversityBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations