IoT Semantic Modeling Using the GWE (Generalized World Entities) Paradigm

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 745)

Abstract

We present here an overview of the Generalized World Entities (GWEs) paradigm, to be used to add a semantic/conceptual dimension to the IoT/WoT procedures. GWEs offer a unified way to model seamlessly, at conceptual level, both the digital counterparts of elementary entities like physical objects, humans, robots etc. and the semantic representations of higher level of abstractions corresponding to structured situations/behaviors.

Keywords

IoT Semantic approach Physical things High-level entities Integration 

References

  1. 1.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54, 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sangaiah, A.K., Thangavelu, A., Meenakshi Venkatesan, S. (eds.): Cognitive Computing for Big Data Systems Over IoT. Springer, Heidelberg (2018, in press)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zarri, G.P.: Generalized world entities as a unifying IoT framework: a case for the GENIUS project. In: Internet of Things and Inter-Cooperative Computational Technologies for Collective Intelligence, pp. 345–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Compton, M., Barnaghi, P., Bermudez, L., García-Castro, R., Corcho, O., Cox, S., Graybeal, J., et al.: The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. Web Semant. Sci., Serv. Agents World Wide Web 17, 25–32 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bermudez-Edo, M., Elsaleh, T., Barnaghi, P., Taylor, K.: IoT-Lite Ontology (W3C Member Submission 26 November 2015). www.w3.org/Submission/iot-lite/. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
  6. 6.
    Haller, A., Janowicz, K., Cox, S., et al. (eds.): Semantic Sensor Network Ontology – W3C Recommendation 19 October 2017. www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/. Accessed 5 Jan 2018
  7. 7.
    Sheth, A., Henson, C., Sahoo, S.: Semantic sensor web. IEEE Internet Comput. 12(4), 78–83 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bauer, M., Bui, N., De Loof, J., Magerkurth, C., Nettsträter, A., Stefa, J., Walewski, J.W.: IoT reference model. In: Enabling Things to Talk, pp. 113–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De, S., Barnaghi, P., Bauer, M., Meissner, S.: Service modelling for the internet of things. In: Proceedings of 2011 Federated Conference – 3rd Workshop on Semantic-Based Software Services, pp. 949–956. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelaidonis, D., Somov, A., Foteinos, V., Poulios, G., et al..: Virtualization and cognitive management of real world objects in the internet of things. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications, IoT, and Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, pp. 187–194. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amarilli, F., Amigoni, F., Fugini, M.G., Zarri, G.P.: A semantic-rich approach to IoT using the generalized world entities paradigm. In: Managing the Web of Things, Linking Real World to the Web, pp. 105–147. Morgan Kaufmann Elsevier, Cambridge (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zarri, G.P.: Conceptual and content-based annotation of (multimedia) documents. Multimedia Tools Appl. 72, 2359–2391 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zarri, G.P.: Functional and semantic roles in a high-level knowledge representation language. Artif. Intell. Rev. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9571-5
  14. 14.
    Zarri, G.P.: Advanced computational reasoning based on the NKRL conceptual model. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 2872–2888 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.STIH LaboratorySorbonne UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations