Improving Project Management Practice Through the Development of a Business Case: A Local Administration Case Study
The identification and implementation of the best practices of project management are preponderant and decisive factors for the success of the companies, regardless of their area of intervention. This highlight arose from the need for companies to respond quickly, efficiently and in an integrated manner to the challenges that an ever-changing environment offers.
In a public transportation company, the challenges should focus on project management improvement initiatives, considering their organizational context and the low level of organizational maturity existing in project management.
The purpose of the research was to develop a solution of a Business Case template that was intended to be integrated into the life cycle of project management of the company under study, transversal to all the areas of knowledge described by PMBoK, having several inputs provided by PRINCE2 and BABOK.
The purpose of the research work was to develop a solution to justify initiatives that lead to projects and ensure a correct management throughout the life cycle of each project.
KeywordsBusiness case Project management practice Project management improving initiatives Integrated project management processes
- 2.Hastie, S., Wojewoda, S.: Standish Group 2015 Chaos Report - Q&A with Jennifer Lynch, pp. 1–9 (2015), http://www.infoq.com/articles/standish-chaos-2015
- 5.Instituto Português da Qualidade, NP4457:2007 - Gestão da Investigação, Desenvolvimento e Inovação (IDI), Requisitos de um projecto de IDI. Instituto Português da Qualidade, pp. 1–31 (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Transportes Urbanos de Braga, Relatório e Contas 2015 (2016)Google Scholar
- 7.Baskerville, R.L.: Investigating information systems with action research. Commun. AIS 2(3es), 4 (1999)Google Scholar
- 9.IIBA, A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK® Guide) – Version 3.0, p. 514 (2015)Google Scholar
- 10.Paul, D., Yeates, D., Cadle, J.: Business Analysis, 2nd edn. BCS The Chartered Institute for IT (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Great Britain. Office of Government Commerce, Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. TSO (2017)Google Scholar
- 12.IBM Corporation, IBM Rational Unified Process, Version, vol. 7, p. 2000 (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Carapeto, C., Fonseca, F.: Administração Pública - Modernização, Qualidade e Inovação, Edições Si (2014)Google Scholar
- 14.PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge - PMBOK® Guide, 5th edn. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania (2013)Google Scholar
- 15.Varajão, J., Pinto, J., Colomo-Palacios, R., Amaral, L.: Modelo para a avaliação do desempenho potencial de gestores de sistemas de informação. Interciencia 37(10), 724–728 (2012)Google Scholar
- 16.Hobbs, P.: Project Management. In: Project Management. DK, Ed. (2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Bell, D.: Comparing the differences and complementary features of PRINCE2® and the PMI PMBOK® Guide, p. 5 (2009)Google Scholar