Advertisement

An Architecture for a Viable Information System

  • Anton Selin
  • Vitor Santos
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 745)

Abstract

The present work is born in the context of problems that organizations facing with their information systems. Modern information systems are monolithic, complex and not ready for the future challenges. And they are playing a key role in a chain of value delivery. Most of the time people do not approach ISs problems in a systemic thinking way, but instead in a reductionist way. In this work, Viable System Model will be used to solve problems described above. The goal of this work is to apply Viable System Model to the Information artifacts. The main outcome from this work is an architecture for Viable Information System, which achieves following goals: understanding of complexity, resilience to change, survival to an external environment and ability to exist independently of its external environment. Systems thinking will be taken as a basis for the development of the ideas presented in this research.

Keywords

Information systems architecture Viable system model Systems thinking Fuzzy logic Complex problems 

References

  1. 1.
    Mahapatra, R., Mangalaraj, G., Nerur, S.: Challenges of Migrating to Agile Methodologies. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schrems, E.L., King, J.L.: Cost-Benefit Analysis in Information Systems Development and Operation. ACM (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan, S., Herring, C.: The viable system architecture. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2001, Brisbane (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Melville, N.P.: Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Q., 1–21 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carvalho, J.A.: Using the viable system model to describe the role of computer-based systems in organizations. In: World Multiconference on Systems, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    von Bertalanffy, L., Rapoport, A.: General Systems. The Society for General Systems Research (1957)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zeglat, D., AlRawabdeh, W., AlMadi, F., Shrafat, F.: Performance measurements systems: stages of development leading to success. Interdisc. J. Contemp. Res. Bus. (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jang, S.R.: ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iwasa, M., Nemoto, H., Kondoh, H., Ise, H.: Patent US5887154 A (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schramm, D.A.: Patent US4670848 A (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montangero, C.: Software process technology. In: 5th European Workshop, EWSPT 1996, Nancy (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kawalek, P., Wastell, D.: A case study evaluation of the use of the viable system model in information systems development. J. Database Manage., 25–26 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hilder, T.: The Viable System Model. Cavendish Software Ltd. (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beer, S.: Brain of the Firm: The Managerial Cybernetics of Organization. Allen Lane the Penguin Press, London (1972)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beer, S.: The Heart of Enterprise. Wiley (1979)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Espejo, R.: The Viable System Model - A Briefing About Organisational Structure. SYNCHO Limited (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jackson, M.C.: Creative Holism for Managers (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ackoff, R.L.: Towards a system of systems concepts. Manage. Sci. (1971)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jackson, M.: Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Springer, Boston (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Al-Mamary, Y.H., Shamsuddin, A., Aziati, N.: The role of different types of information systems in business organizations. Int. J. Res. (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henver, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lyytinen, K.: Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR), 5–46 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Manson, N.: Is operations research really research? In: The Operations Research Society of South Africa, pp. 169–171 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rocha, Á., Sá, F.: Planning the information architecture in a local public administration organization. Inf. Dev. 30(4), 223–234 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NOVA IMSLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations