Abstract
Notwithstanding considerable efforts are being made to gather transport and mobility data, by means of new technological devices, in Italy a major spatially comprehensive source of information is the population census. Data about journeys-to-work and journeys-to-school at municipality level have been made available by the Italian Central Bureau of Statistics (ISTAT) at 1991, 2001 and 2011 census years. Such data provide a sound information basis for drawing retrospective accounts of mobility. However, it is likely to be unsatisfactory for a number of planning activities, such as monitoring and forward looking investigations. They often require expensive individual surveys which may be inaccessible, either for public and private agencies. This study aims at alleviating the problem by developing a computational and analytic tool for estimating journeys-to-work at sub-regional level. The study proposes a strategy which links the reconstruction of yearly mobility flows, based on available spatially fine-grained socioeconomic information, with the generation of new flow matrices, depending on regional socioeconomic scenarios. In this application to Piedmont, we first reconstruct the mobility flows in the 2001–2013 period according to sub regional population and employment data as well as the census mobility tables. Econometric regression techniques have been used to estimate the origin and destination totals of mobility matrices; Wilson’s entropy maximization approach to fully constrained spatial interaction models has been applied to compute the matrix cell values. The mobility deterrence parameter series associated with the flow matrices have been analyzed according to a set of socioeconomic variables, for which regional level demographic and economic trends from 2014 to 2020 are provided by ISTAT (population forecasts) and Prometeia (macro-economic studies). Parameters estimates have been obtained which, together with auto-regressively calculated origin and destinations totals of mobility tables, have been used to infer the regional flow matrices from 2014 to 2020. In discussing the main results of the approach attention focuses on its practical relevance for planning purpose and its portability. Some methodological issues concerning the calculation of the deterrence parameter are also mentioned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The entropy procedure is based on the enumeration approach of combinatorial analysis, and it follows from statistical mechanics. The basic premise of these models is to enumerate all the possible zone-to-zone flow interchanges and pick the one with the highest uncertainty subject to constraints, see Wilson (1967, 1971).
- 2.
Although in some boarder zones of Piedmont the share of flows to and from other regions is not negligible, the issue was not considered relevant in the current version of the model application.
- 3.
Firms statistics involved are those of the ASIA database of ISTAT, the statistical archive of active firms.
- 4.
At the time the model has been developed the last updated information were at 2013. Currently, population data are available up to 2016 and firms’ data are available up to 2014. Adding three years more for population and one year more for firms would have led to an impairment of yields. Hence, to maintain the synchronization, 2014 would have been the last year at which both sources of information were available: adding one more year would have not improved the outcomes significantly.
- 5.
The regional population forecast is from ISTAT. The Piedmont socioeconomic scenario is from Prometeia.
References
Acheampong RA, Silva AE (2015) Land use-transport interaction modeling: a review of the literature and future research directions. J Transp Land Use 8(3):11–38
Agenzia della Mobilità Piemontese (2013) Rapporti IMQ 2013. http://mtm.torino.it/it/dati-statistiche/indagine-imq-2013/rapporti-imq-2013
Arentze T, Timmermans H (2000) ALBATROSS: A learning based transportation oriented simulation system. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven
Banister D (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp Policy 15:73–80
Bernardino J, Aggelakakis A, Reichenbach M, Vieira J, Boile M, Schippl J, Christidis P, Papanikolaou A, Condeco A, Garcia H, Krail H (2015) Transport demand evolution in Europe—factors of change, scenarios and challenges. Eur J Futures Res 3(13):1–13
De Bruijne M, van de Riet O, de Haan A, Koppenjan J (2010) Dealing with dilemma’s: how can experiments contribute to a more sustainable mobility system? Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 3:274–289
Debyseru A (2014) Urban mobility: shifting towards sustainable transport systems. European Parliament Research Service. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_IDA(2014)538224
Dovey Fishmant T (2012). Digital-age transportation: the future of urban mobility. Deloitte University Press. http://www.enterrasolutions.com/media/docs/2013/07/Digital-Age-TRANSPORTATION.pdf
European Parliament (2014) Urban mobility. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2014/538224/EPRS_IDA(2014)538224_REV1_EN.pdf
Feuillet T, Charreire H, Menai M, Salze P, Simon C, Dugas J et al (2015) Spatial heterogeneity of the relationships between environmental characteristics and active commuting: towards a locally varying social ecological mode. Int J Health Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0002-z
Gillis D, Semanjski I, Lauwers D (2016) How to monitor sustainable mobility in cities? Literature review in the frame of creating a set of sustainable mobility indicators. Sustainability 8(12):29
Givoni M (2014) Addressing transport policy challenges through policy packaging. Transp Res 60:1–8
Givoni M, Shiftan Y, Beyazit E, Ishaq R, Tzu O (2012) The use of state-of-the-art models by policy makers to address global energy and environment challenges: the case of transport policy (Working Paper N° 1060). Retrieved March 2017, from http://www.tsu.ox.ac.uk/pubs/1060-givoni-beyazit.pdf
Gössling S (2017) ICT and transport behaviour: a conceptual review. Int J Sustain Transp. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1338318
Graham S, Patsy H (1999) Relational concepts of space and place: issues for planning theory and practice. Eur Plan Stud 7(5):623–646
Hawelka B, Sitko I, Beinat E, Sobolevsky S, Kazakopoulos P, Ratti C (2014) Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 41(3):260–271
Kung KS, Greco K, Sobolevsky S, Ratti C (2014) Exploring universal patterns in human home-work commuting from mobile phone data. PLoS ONE 9(6):e96180. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096180
Landini S, Occelli S (2016a) La mobilità quotidiana e per cura negli ambiti di integrazione territoriale del Piemonte. http://www.ires.piemonte.it/reset/RESET2016_A4/RESET2016_cap3.1.pdf
Landini S, Occelli S (2016b) Mobility flow estimates at sub‐regional level: an application to piedmont. In: Colombo G, Lombardi P, Mondini G (eds) Proceedings of the INPUT 2016 9th international conference on innovation in urban and regional planning, Turin, pp 533–537
Landini S, Occelli S (2017) Stima e simulazione delle tavole di mobilità casa-lavoro in Piemonte: esplorazione di scenari socioeconomici. Paper presented at the AISRE Conference, Cagliari 20–22 September. https://www.aisre.it/images/aisre/5965dac732e174.97480154/Landini_Occelli_Aisre2017.pdf
Litman T (2006) Changing travel demand: implications for transport planning. ITE J 76(9):27–33
Litman T, Burwell T (2006) Issues in sustainable transportation. Int J Glob Environ Issues 6(4):331–347
Lord S, Negron-Poblete P, Juan Torres J (eds) (2015) Mobilité et Exclusion, Quelle relations? Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Canada
Lyons G, Davidson C (2016) Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 88:104–116
Mitchell WJ, Borroni-Bird CE, Burns LD (2010) Reinventing the automobile, personal urban mobility for the 21st century. MIT, Cambridge
Neill G, Bright J, Hale SJ (2017) Estimating local commuting patterns from geolocated Twitter data. EPJ Data Sci 6:24. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0120-x
Occelli S (2006) La mobilità in Piemonte nei primi anni del 2000, Quaderni di Ricerca, 110, Ires, Torino. www.digibess.it/fedora/…/openbess_TO082-01680.pdf
Occelli S, Sciullo A (2015a) Uno sguardo ai cambiamenti della mobilità (quotidiana) in Piemonte tra passato e futuro, http://www.ires.piemonte.it/reset/RESET2014_A4/RESET2014_cap3.1.pdf
Papa R, Galderisi A, Vigo Majello MC, Saretta E (2015) Smart and resilient cities. A systemic approach for developing cross-sectoral strategies in the face of climate change. TeMA 8(1):19–49. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2883
Polyzos S, Tsiotas D, Minetos D (2013) Determining the driving factors of commuting: an empirical analysis from Greece. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 6(3):46–55. http://www.prd.uth.gr/uploads/publications/2013/7f20e656f4da760ae45938e0599f058a4b2aabd8.pdf
Regione Piemonte (2016) Piano Regionale della Mobilità e dei Trasporti. http://www.regione.piemonte.it/trasporti/piano_regionale.htm
Shuldiner A, Shuldiner PW (2013) The measure of all things: reflections on changing conceptions of the individual in travel demand modelling. Transportation 40:1117–1134
Timms P, Tight M, Watling D (2014) Imagineering mobility: constructing utopias for future urban transport. Environ Plann A 46(1):78–93
Viguié V, Hallegatte S, Rozenberg J (2014) Downscaling long term socio-economic scenarios at city scale: a case study on Paris. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 87:305–324
Wilson A (1967) A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transp Res 1:253–269
Wilson A (1968) The use of entropy maximising models in the theory of trip distribution-mode split and route split. Centre for Environmental Studies, London
Wilson AG (1971) A family of spatial interaction models, and associated developments. Environ Plann 3:1–32
Wilson AG (1987) Transport, location and spatial systems: planning with spatial interaction models. In: Bertuglia CS, Leonardi G, Occelli S, Rabino GA, Tadei R, Wislon AG (eds) Urban systems. Contemporary approaches to modelling. Routledge, pp 337–426
Wilson AG (1998) Land-use/transport interaction models: past and future. J Transp Econ Policy 32(1):3–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landini, S., Occelli, S. (2018). Estimation of Mobility Flows at Sub-regional Level: An Application to Piedmont Based on a Socioeconomic Scenario. In: Papa, R., Fistola, R., Gargiulo, C. (eds) Smart Planning: Sustainability and Mobility in the Age of Change. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77682-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77682-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77681-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77682-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)